ChemComm
Communication
established that 1 is a desired imaging agent used for visualizing
H2S in vivo for the first time.
In summary, we presented a new fluorescent probe 1 for specific
H2S detection with two-photon absorption and NIR emission. It
exhibited a significant fluorescence response for H2S over other
reactive oxygen species and biologically relevant reactive sulfide
species. Thus it is suitable for H2S detection in bovine serum with a
quite low probe concentration. Living cells and tissue imaging
Fig. 3 Fluorescence imaging of H2S in MCF-7 cells incubated with 5 mM probe 1.
Cells were incubated with 1 for 30 min (a), after which 50 equiv. of H2S was
added. After further incubation for 30 min (b) and 60 min (c) the cells were established the utility of this probe for tracking H2S in biological
imaged. lex = 800 nm, emission window (575 nm–630 nm). Scale bars: 20 mm.
systems using TPM microscopy. More importantly, the probe was
first successfully utilized to realize H2S imaging in living mice.
of imaging H2S in different living cells by using both OPM and TPM.
Cytotoxicity test using MCF-7 cells showed that probe 1 and the
corresponding product 1-NH2 have almost no toxicity to living cells
(Fig. S11, ESI†).
Taken together, 1 is a robust imaging agent for H2S detection both
in vitro and in vivo. We expect this new probe to be useful in more
chemical and biological applications.
This work was supported by NSF of China (21136002,
20923006 and 21076032) and National Basic Research Program
of China (2013CB733702 and 2013CB733702).
We further investigated the utility of probe 1 in tissue imaging.
Since it takes a longer time to stain the tissues during which they
may be deformed, an excess amount (20 mM) of 1 was used to
facilitate staining. A fresh rat liver cancer slice incubated with 20 mM
probe 1 for 60 min showed weak fluorescence in the whole region.
After incubation with H2S (50 equiv.) for another 60 min, there was
an even and significant increase in fluorescence intensity excited at
800 nm (Fig. S12, ESI†). Furthermore, depth scanning demonstrated
that the corresponding product 1-NH2 was capable of tissue imaging
at depths of 60–220 mm by TPM (Fig. S13, ESI†).
Finally, we examined the suitability of the sensor for visualizing
H2S in living animals. ICR mice were selected and divided into two
groups. One group was given an s.p. (skin-pop) injection of probe 1
(40 mM, in 25 mL DMSO) on the back of ICR mice as the control
experiment. The other group was then given an s.p. injection of
25 equiv. of NaHS (25 mL, 0.1 mM PBS) after the disposal of the
control mice. The two groups were imaged using a NightOWL II
LB983 small animal in vivo imaging system with a 530 nm excitation
laser and a 655 Æ 20 nm emission filter. Fig. 4 shows a representa-
tive fluorescent image of mice treated with probe 1 and NaHS at
different times after injection and demonstrates that the fluores-
cence intensity became strong gradually within 4 hours. Whereas
the control experiment shows almost no fluorescence, proving that
probe 1 can detect H2S in vivo without the interference of back-
ground signals (Fig. S14a, ESI†). Taken together these experiments
Notes and references
1 B. K. Czyzewski and D.-N. Wang, Nature, 2012, 483, 494–498.
2 (a) L. Li, P. Rose and P. K. Moore, Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol.,
2011, 51, 169–187; (b) M. M. Gadalla and S. H. Snyder, J. Neurochem.,
2010, 113, 14–26.
3 B. D. Paul and S. H. Snyder, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 2012, 13,
499–507.
4 (a) H. Kimura, Amino Acids, 2011, 41, 113–121; (b) E. Blackstone,
M. Morrison and M. B. Roth, Science, 2005, 308, 518.
5 J. L. Wallace, Trends Pharmacol. Sci., 2007, 28, 501–504.
6 Y. Han, J. Qin, X. Chang, Z. Yang and J. Du, Cell. Mol. Neurobiol.,
2006, 26, 101–107.
7 (a) K. Eto, T. Asada, K. Arima, T. Makifuchi and H. Kimura, Biochem.
Biophys. Res. Commun., 2002, 293, 1485–1488; (b) P. Kamoun,
M.-C. Belardinelli, A. Chabli, K. Lallouchi and B. Chadefaux-
Vekemans, Am. J. Med. Genet., Part A, 2003, 116, 310–311;
(c) W. Yang, G. Yang, X. Jia, L. Wu and R. Wang, J. Physiol., 2005,
569, 519–531.
8 (a) S. K. Pandey and K.-H. Kim, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2009, 43,
3020–3029; (b) B. K. Reese, D. W. Finneran, H. J. Mills, M.-X. Zhu
and J. W. Morse, Aquat. Geochem., 2011, 17, 567–582.
9 (a) M. E. Jun, B. Roy and K. H. Ahn, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47,
7583–7601; (b) X. J. Zhao and C. Z. Huang, TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem.,
´
´
2010, 29, 354–367; (c) M. Fernandez-Suarez and A. Y. Ting, Nat. Rev.
Mol. Cell Biol., 2008, 9, 929–943; (d) C. Chung, D. Srikun, C. S. Lim,
C. J. Chang and B. R. Cho, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 9618–9620.
10 (a) H. Peng, Y. Cheng, C. Dai, A. L. King, B. L. Predmore, D. J. Lefer
and B. Wang, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 1–5; (b) L. A. Montoya
and M. D. Pluth, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 4767–4769; (c) S. K. Das,
C. S. Lim, S. Y. Yang, J. H. Han and B. R. Cho, Chem. Commun., 2012,
48, 8395–8397; (d) S. Chen, Z.-j. Chen, W. Ren and H.-w. Ai, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 9589–9592; (e) A. R. Lippert, E. J. New and
C. J. Chang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 10078–11080; ( f ) F. Yu,
P. Li, P. Song, B. Wang, J. Zhao and K. Han, Chem. Commun., 2012,
48, 2852–2854; (g) Q. Wan, Y. Song, Z. Li, X. Gao and H. Ma, Chem.
Commun., 2012, 48, 502–504.
11 (a) C. Liu, J. Pan, S. Li, Y. Zhao, L. Y. Wu, C. E. Berkman,
A. R. Whorton and M. Xian, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 123,
10511–10513; (b) Y. Qian, L. Zhang, S. Deng, C. He and J. Zhao,
Chem. Sci., 2012, 3, 2920–2922; (c) X. Cao, W. Lin, K. Zheng and
L. He, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 10529–10531.
12 K. Sasakura, K. Hanaoka, N. Shibuya, Y. Mikami, Y. Kimura,
T. Komatsu, T. Ueno, T. Terai, H. Kimura and T. Nagano, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 18003–18005.
13 (a) M. Pawlicki, H. A. Collins, R. G. Denning and H. L. Anderson,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 3244–3266; (b) H. M. Kim and
B. R. Cho, Acc. Chem. Res., 2009, 42, 863–872; (c) T. Terai and
T. Nagano, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 2008, 12, 515–521.
14 S. Takahashi, W. Piao, Y. Matsumura, T. Komatsu, T. Ueno, T. Terai,
T. Kamachi, M. Kohno, T. Nagano and K. Hanaoka, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2012, 134, 19588–19591.
Fig. 4 Representative fluorescence images of mice (pseudo-color) given an s.p.
injection of probe 1 (40 mM, in 25 mL DMSO) and then injected with 25 equiv. of
NaHS (25 mL, 0.1 mM PBS). Images were taken after incubation of NaHS for
different times (0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 h).
c
3892 Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 3890--3892
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013