C. Tang et al. / Applied Catalysis A: General 508 (2015) 10–15
11
2. Experimental
Mg(NO3)2
MgO
2.1. Catalyst preparation
A series of Mg(N)/SiO2 catalysts with different Mg loadings
were prepared using an incipient wetness method. In a typical
preparation, the SiO2 support (SBET = 378.8 m2 g−1) was added to
an appropriate amount of aqueous solution of Mg(NO3)2·6H2O
(Aladdin, 99 %), and the mixture was sonicated for 30 min at room
temperature by a commercial ultrasonic cleaner (Branson, 1510R-
MT, 70 W, 42 kHz). Then the mixture was kept for 6 h at room
temperature. Finally, it was mildly evaporated at 90 ◦C to com-
pletely remove water, and then dried at 120 ◦C overnight. The
resulting solid was pretreated under a N2 flow (30 ml min−1) at dif-
ferent temperatures (300–500 ◦C) for 1.5 h. The obtained catalysts
were designated as xMg(N)/SiO2−y, with x and y refer to the weight
percent of Mg and pretreatment temperature, respectively. A refer-
ence catalyst 10Mg(Cl)/SiO2−300 with a precursor of MgCl2·6H2O
was also prepared in a similar manner.
20Mg(N)/SiO2-300
10Mg(N)/SiO2-300
6Mg(N)/SiO2-300
2Mg(N)/SiO2-300
1Mg(N)/SiO2-300
SiO2
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
2 Theta / o
2.2. Catalyst characterization
Fig. 1. XRD patterns of Mg(N)/SiO2 catalysts with different Mg loadings.
Actual contents of Mg and Cl in the catalysts were determined by
X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis, on a Shimadzu XRF-1800 spec-
trometer. The Qual-Quantitative analysis automatically executed a
quantitative analysis in the FP method after the qualitative analy-
sis of a sample of unknown composition. The X-ray generator was
operated at 40 kV and 70 mA, while the step angle and speed were
0.1◦ and 8◦ min−1, respectively.
equipped with a FID detector. The carbon balance was calculated
to be 5%.
3. Results and discussion
The BET surface areas of the catalysts were measured by N2
adsorption at liquid-nitrogen temperature (77 K), using a surface
area analyzer (Quantachrome Autosorb-1). The catalysts were pre-
treated at 120 ◦C for 6 h in vacuum.
Table 1 summarizes the physical properties of the Mg catalysts.
It is found that the actual content of Mg is very close to the cor-
responding nominal value, suggesting that there is no loss of Mg
in the preparation process. The surface area of the Mg catalyst
gradually declines with Mg loading. The 20Mg(N)/SiO2−300 cat-
alyst has the lowest surface area (32.7 m−2 g−1), probably due to
the blockage of internal pores of SiO2 by the Mg species. Fig. 1
presents the XRD patterns of the Mg catalysts with different Mg
loadings. Only one broad diffraction peak centered at about 2ꢀ of
22.3◦ could be observed for the catalyst with Mg content lower
than 10 wt.%, which is attributed to the amorphous SiO2 support.
No diffraction of Mg species could be detected, probably due to
the high dispersion of these species on the surface. When the Mg
loading is 20 wt.%, the diffraction peaks due to MgO (PDF 30-0794)
and Mg(NO3)2 (PDF 19-0765) emerge. The formation of MgO is a
MgO + 4 NO2 + O2). Thus, it could be concluded that the fresh cata-
is supported by TG-DTA curves of the un-pretreated 10Mg(N)/SiO2
catalyst (Fig. 2). The first major weight loss of the sample ranges
from 99 to 330 ◦C, and the DTA curve gives two characteristic
peaks at 133 and 264 ◦C, which are due to the gradual removal of
crystal water in Mg(NO3)2· 6H2O molecule [32]. Besides, the ther-
mal decomposition of Mg(NO3)2 starts from 330 ◦C and completes
at 483 ◦C to form MgO. The weight loss at these stages is about
55.4% of the total weight, which is consistent with the theoretical
value (54.5%,(2 Mg(NO3)2·6H2O → 2 MgO + 4 NO2 + O2 + 12H2O)). It
is worth noting that the thermal decomposition of Mg(NO3)2·6H2O
is not completed at low calcination temperatures (i.e. 300 ◦C), as
the XRD results reveal the presence of both MgO and Mg(NO3)2,
particularly at high Mg loadings (e.g. 20Mg(N)/SiO2). The influence
of Mg loadings on the catalytic performance is shown in Fig. 3.
It can be seen that the conversion of TCE first increases and then
decreases with the Mg loading, and the highest conversion (92%)
is obtained on the 10Mg(N)/SiO2−300 catalyst. Also, it seems that
there is an induction period for the TCE conversion, which gradu-
ally increases in the first 2 h reaction and gradually reaches a steady
X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded with a PANalyt-
ical XꢀPert PRO MPD powder diffractometer using Cu K␣ radiation.
The working voltage was 40 kV and the working current was 40 mA.
The patterns were collected in a 2ꢀ range from 10 to 80◦, with a
scanning speed of 0.15◦ s−1
.
High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM)
was performed on a JEM-2100F microscopy with a field emissive
gun, operated at 200 kV and with a point resolution of 0.24 nm.
Thermogravimetric analysis (TG-DTA) was conducted on a NET-
ZSCH STA 449C thermal graphic analyzer. N2 was used as the carrier
gas (30 ml min−1, atmospheric). The heating rate was 10 ◦C min−1
.
Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of the samples were
recorded on a NEXUS670 spectrometer equipped with a MCT detec-
tor in the range of 400–4000 cm−1 using KBr pellets. All obtained
spectra were auto-baseline corrected.
2.3. Activity test
Catalytic dehydrochlorination of TCE was carried out in a con-
ventional fixed-bed reactor (i.d. = 8 mm). 0.3 g of the catalyst was
diluted into a volume of 0.6 ml with a small amount of quartz
sand and loaded in the reactor. A thermalcouple was placed in
the middle of the catalyst bed to monitor the actual reaction
temperature. Before reaction, the catalyst was heated from room
temperature to desired temperature (300 - 500 ◦C) at a heating
rate of 5 ◦C min−1 in N2 (30 ml min−1) and kept for 90 min at the
desired temperature, and then was cooled to the reaction temper-
ature of 300 ◦C. The reactant flow was generated by flowing N2
through a bubbler containing liquid TCE (TCE content = 4.6 vol.%,
N2 flow rate = 30 ml min−1, GHSV = 1000 h−1). The reactant flow
was introduced to the catalyst bed consisting of the Mg catalysts.
The concentrations of TCE and other organic products during the
reaction were analyzed by an Agilent 6850 gas chromatograph