C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 1. Carbonyl-Ene Reactions Using HCHO@NaYa
Zr(Ot-Bu)4/diisopropyl tartrate/cumene hydroperoxide/molecular
sieves, which was a key intermeditate for the synthesis of
Tachykinin receptor antagonists (8).11
In summary, we demonstrated that ubiquitous faujasite zeolite,
NaY, which forms uniform supercages of nanosize, can preserve
labile formaldehyde in a monomeric form for a long period of time
at ambient temperatures and can also activate the formaldehyde
sufficiently enough to react with various olefins. The application
of HCHO@zeolite to other nonionic nucleophiles is underway.12
Acknowledgment. We are grateful to Dr. K. Fujimoto (Process
Development Laboratories, Sankyo Co., Ltd.) for helpful discussions
and encouragement throughout this work.
a HCHO@NaY (HCHO content 2.4 mmol/g). b Solvent: cyclohexane.
c Solvent: cyclohexane/hexane
)
9/1. d Solvent: hexane. e Use of
HCHO@NaY stored at room temperature for 30 days. f Use of HCHO@NaX
(HCHO content 2.4 mmol/g). g Reacted with gaseous HCHO without zeolite.
h See ref 3b.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures and
spectroscopic data (PDF). This material is available free of charge via
had been difficult to achieve efficiently by using typical Lewis
acids.2 More interestingly, the reaction with HCHO@NaY, which
had been kept at room temperature for 30 days, afforded a
comparable yield (entry 2). This proves that active HCHO can
survive in NaY even at room temperature for at least 30 days
without any loss of reactivity. In contrast, HCHO@NaX was much
less reactive in the same reaction even though monomeric form-
aldehyde was similarly incorporated in supercages of NaX (entry
3).9 We suppose that this is due to the lower acidity of NaX as
compared to that of NaY. It was also confirmed that a simple
treatment of olefin with gaseous formaldehyde without NaY gave
no ene adducts (entry 4). This result strongly supports the fact that
formaldehyde in HCHO@NaY is stabilized and simultaneously
activated inside the zeolite supercages, which increases its elec-
trophilicity.
The reaction of trisubstituted and cyclic olefins with HCHO@NaY
afforded the corresponding ene products in good yields (entries
6-8), but unfortunately with low selectivity (entry 7). In the case
of limonene, there was a large difference in selectivity between
HCHO activated by Lewis acids and HCHO@NaY (entry 8).
Dimethylaluminum chloride and a much bulkier organoaluminum
reagent, MAPH (methylaluminum bis(2,6-diphenylphenoxide)),
induced the reaction preferentially at the olefinic site on the side
chain of limonene.3b On the other hand, the reaction of limonene
with HCHO@NaY predominantly gave ene adduct 4 with good
selectivity and in high yield. This selectivity seems to be derived
from the particular affinity of a NaY supercage to a cyclic
hydrocarbon over a linear one.10
References
(1) (a) Angelo, J.; Stork, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 7114. (b) Hajos, Z.
G.; Parrish, D. R. J. Org. Chem. 1973, 38, 3244. (c) Lucast, D. H.;
Wemple, J. Synthesis 1976, 724. (d) Stork, G.; Isobe, M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1975, 97, 4745.
(2) (a) Snider, B. B. In ComprehensiVe Organic Synthesis; Trost, B. M.,
Fleming, I., Eds.; Pergamon Press: Oxford, 1991; Vol. 2, pp 527-561.
(b) Okachi, T.; Fujimoto, K.; Onaka, M. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 1667.
(3) (a) Maruoka, K.; Concepcion, A. B.; Hirayama, N.; Yamamoto, H. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 7422. (b) Maruoka, K.; Concepcion, A. B.;
Murase, N.; Oishi, M.; Hirayama, N.; Yamamoto, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1993, 115, 3943.
(4) (a) Mikami, K.; Terada, M.; Shimizu, M.; Nakai, T. J. Synth. Org. Chem.,
Jpn. 1990, 48, 292. (b) Mikami, K.; Shimizu, M. Chem. ReV. 1992, 92,
1021.
(5) NaX containing more aluminum atoms is more basic than NaY; NaX has
a less acidic character than NaY.
(6) (a) Breck, W. Zeolite Molecular SieVes; John Wiley & Sons: New York,
1974. (b) Baerlocher, C.; Meier, W. M.; Olson, D. H. Atlas of Zeolite
Framework Types, 5th ed.; Elsevier: New York, 2001. (c) Izumi, Y.;
Urabe, K.; Onaka, M. Zeolite, Clay, and Heteropoly Acid in Organic
Reactions; Kodansha: Tokyo, 1992.
(7) Freeman, J. J.; Unland, M. L. J. Catal. 1978, 54, 183.
(8) (a) Sefcik, M. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 2164. (b) Philippou, A.;
Anderson, M. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 5774. (c) Hunger, M.;
Schenk, U.; Weitkamp, J. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 1998, 134, 97. (d)
Hunger, M.; Schenk, U.; Weitkamp, J. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2000,
156, 153.
(9) By using HCHO@CaA and HCHO@Na-mordenite, no carbonyl-ene
adducts were obtained.
(10) (a) Eberly, P. E.; Baker, L. E. J. Appl. Chem. 1967, 17, 44. (b) Wu, P.;
Ma, Y. Zeolites 1983, 3, 118.
(11) (a) Okachi, T.; Murai, N.; Onaka, M. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 85. (b) Nishi,
T.; Ishibashi, K.; Takemoto, T.; Nakajima, K.; Fukazawa, T.; Iio, K.;
Mukaiyama, O.; Yamaguchi, T. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2000, 10, 1665.
(12) Ionic reagents such as RMgX are not proper as a nucleophile toward
HCHO@zeolite because the aluminosilicate framework of zeolites with
a high Al content such as NaX and NaY is fragile under such strongly
basic conditions.
Carbonyl-ene product 6 was able to be transformed to a chiral
epoxide 7 in 93% yield with 89% ee by a combination of
JA039737P
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 126, NO. 8, 2004 2307