Angewandte
Chemie
upon heating at 608C for 48 h, only TMSCl was observed in
the reaction mixture. This experiment clearly proved that
under these conditions the TMS radical is not formed. In
a second stage, the Mo-catalyzed transformation of N2 into
N(TMS)3 was studied (Table 1). The formation of N(TMS)3 as
Table 1: Catalytic investigations.
[a]
Entry Reductant Additive Catalyst
T
NTMS3
Yield of
NTMS3
[b]
[8C] [equiv]
Figure 2. POV-Ray plots of complexes 9 and 10 (50% thermal ellip-
soids are shown). Hydrogen atoms have been omitted and only iPr
fragments of the Cy have been kept for clarity. Selected bond lengths
[ꢁ] and angles [8]: 9: Mo–N 1.798(5), N–Si 1.740(5), Mo–P1
2.4319(18), Mo–P2 2.4822(17), Mo–P3 2.4170(18), Mo–P4 2.4271(18);
N-Mo-P2 179.59(18), Mo-N-Si 178.3(3), P1-Mo-P2 75.45(6), P1-Mo-P3
113.03(7), P1-Mo-P4 114.85(6), P2-Mo-P3 75.62(6), P2-Mo-P4
74.76(6), P3-Mo-P4 113.43(6). 10: Mo–N 1.839(2), N–Si 1.718(2), Mo–
P1 2.4911(7), Mo–P2 2.4281(6), Mo–P3 2.4342(6), Mo–P4 2.4221(7);
N-Mo-P1 178.06(7), Mo-N-Si 177.01(15), P1-Mo-P2 74.33(2), P1-Mo-P3
75.02(2), P1-Mo-P4 75.71(2), P2-Mo-P3 114.82(2), P2-Mo-P4
113.41(2), P3-Mo-P4 112.44(2).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Na sand
Na sand
Na/Hg
Na/Hg
Na/Hg
Na/K
Na/K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
–
NaI
–
–
–
–
NaI
–
–
–
–
–
NaI
–
–
5
5
5
5
9
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
9
2
25
50
25
50
50
50
90
25
25
25
50
90
50
50
50
5.8
2.8
2.1
2.4
1.4
11.7
10.2
10.5
11.4
4.4
15.0
8.3
13.3
11.8
11.7
8.7
4.2
3.2
3.6
2.1
17.6
15.3
15.8
17.1
6.6
22.5
12.5
20.0
17.7
17.6
9[c]
10[d]
11
12
13
14
15
À
The Mo N bond of 1.798(5) ꢀ is shorter than in complex
=
ꢀ
4 but still lies on the high side of the reported Mo N and Mo
N bonds. A related complex 10 was synthesized in a one-pot
procedure from complex 2 by subsequent reductions in the
presence of TMSCl (to form 5 in situ) and then PhSiMe2Cl.
The corresponding amine 8 was observed by GC-MS analysis.
Complex 10, characterized also by a quartet and a doublet at
158 and 133 ppm, respectively, in the 31P{1H} NMR spectrum,
was crystallized (Figure 2). The structure presents very similar
features to that of 9, such as the linear arrangement of Mo-N-
[a] Equivalents of NTMS3 =equiv amine/cat. [b] Yield of NTMS3 based
on initial TMSCl. [c] The reaction time was 4 days. [d] TMSBr was used
instead of TMSCl.
the sole amine was verified by 29Si NMR spectroscopy, and
quantified by the indophenol method.[25,26] Complex 5 was
used to optimize the experimental conditions. The nature of
the reducing agent was probed at 258C (entries 1, 3, and 8),
showing that Na/Hg did not allow a catalytic reaction to occur
(2.1 equiv of NTMS3: the amount of NH3 measured by the
indophenol method results from the hydrolysis of complex 5,
which already contains two N atoms). This was corroborated
by the reaction with complex 9, which only provided 1.4 equiv
of NTMS3 (entry 5). Potassium provided the best results
(10.5 equiv of NTMS3, entry 8) of the reducing agents. When
the reaction was performed for a longer time (4 days, entry 9),
the outcome was very similar (11.4 versus 10.5 equiv NTMS3),
which indicated catalyst decomposition after 2 days. Most
importantly, these experiments together with the above-
mentioned catalyst-free reactions prove the involvement of
a TMS radical in the catalytic process. As the reactions
appeared quite slow, the effect of temperature (entries 8, 11,
and 12) as well as the nature of the Si derivative were probed
(entries 2, 7, 10, and 13). The best results were obtained at
508C [15.0 equiv of NTMS3, entry 11 versus 10.5 equiv
(entry 8) and 8.3 equiv (entry 12) at 258C and 908C, respec-
tively]. In contrast to Hidaiꢁs observation, the addition of
neither TMSBr nor TMSI (generated in situ by the reaction
between TMSCl and NaI) improved the catalysis. The results
with TMSI were at best similar to those with TMSCl (13.3
versus 15.0 equiv NTMS3, entry 13 versus 11, respectively).
Finally, with the optimized conditions (508C, TMSCl, and K),
the three complexes 2, 5, and 9 could be compared, and
appeared to be equally suitable for the catalytic transforma-
tion of N2 to N(TMS)3.
=
Si and the TBP geometry, yet with a slightly elongated Mo N
bond (1.839(2) ꢀ in 10 versus 1.798(5) ꢀ in 9). These
complexes are the first examples, in which the Mo–imido
bond is generated through N2 functionalization. It also proves
that the chosen ligand, despite its bulkiness, favors amine
À
elimination through in-sphere N N splitting rather than
hydrazine derivative elimination.
With a series of Mo complexes in hand that are able to
transform N2 into N(SiMe3)3 or N(SiMe3)(SiMe2CH2-
CH2SiMe2) by the stoichiometric reduction/functionalization
of N2, their performance in the catalytic formation of
N(SiMe3)3 from N2, TMSX (X = Cl, Br, and I), and various
sources of reducing agents was studied. Most importantly,
their relative efficiency in the catalytic process will provide
information on their involvement in the catalytic cycle versus
being dead-end species. In a first series of experiments,
“blank” reactions (without Mo complex) were carried out.
These were crucial to prove the involvement of Si-centered
radicals during the process. Indeed, when TMSCl was reacted
with K or NaK in THF at room temperature, TMS–TMS was
formed as expected from the efficient and fast generation of
SiMe3 radical. When the reaction was carried out with Na,
Me3Si(CH2)4OSiMe3 was formed as a result of the reaction of
the radical with THF, in addition to TMS–TMS as previously
observed by Nishibayashi, Yoshizawa, and co-workers.[4]
On the other hand, although the redox potential of Na/Hg
is low enough to allow the effective reduction of TMSCl, the
kinetics of this reduction appeared very slow. Indeed, even
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 1 – 6
ꢀ 2014 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
3
These are not the final page numbers!