Communications
contrast to the salen ligand 4, ligand 5 was also able to effect,
for the first time, an enantioselective addition of allyl iodide
stirred at that temperature. When the aldehyde was completely
consumed (as confirmed by thin-layer chromatography (TLC)),
saturated aqueous NaHCO was added. After filtration and evapo-
3
(
(
Table 1, entry 2). Allyl chloride added with similar selectivity
84% ee using 4, versus 79% ee using DIANANE-based 5;
ration, the aqueous phase was extracted with Et O. After evaporation
[
5]
2
of the combined organic phases, the residue was dissolved in THF
Table 1, entry 3). Of the three allyl halides tested, the bromide
thus afforded the best enantioselectivity. The related b-
methylallyl halides (Table 1, entries 4 and 5) reacted just as
smoothly as the allyl halides. However, the observed enan-
tioselectivities for these compounds (54% and 64% ee for the
chloride and bromide, respectively) were not as high as for
allyl bromide (90% ee). As a model for projected applications
in polyketide natural-product synthesis, we tested PMB-
(
1 mL). Aqueous 1m HCl (0.5 mL) was added and the mixture was
stirred until desilylation was complete (confirmed by TLC). The
solvent was removed, the residue extracted with Et O, and the
combined organic phases were dried over MgSO . Evaporation of the
solvent and flash chromatography (hexane/Et O 4:1) gave (R)-1-
phenyl-3-buten-1-ol as a pale-yellow oil (26.7 mg, 180 mmol, 72%
yield, 90% ee).
2
4
2
Received: October 21, 2002 [Z50397]
protected 3-hydroxypropanal (PMB = para-methoxybenzyl),
shown in entry 6 of Table 1.[
12,14,15]
Again, after optimizing the
reaction temperature, coupling with allyl bromide occurred
with high enantioselectivity (92% ee).[
16]
[
1] For reviews, see: a) A. S. K. Hashmi, J. Prakt. Chem. 1996, 338,
91 – 495; b) L. A. Wessjohann, G. Scheid, Synthesis 1999, 1—36;
The encouraging results achieved with allylic halides
prompted us to examine the use of our catalytic NHK process
with vinyl iodides and triflates for the enantioselective
4
c) A. Fürstner, Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 991 – 1045; d) A. Fürstner,
Chem. Eur. J. 1998, 4, 567 – 570.
II
synthesis of allylic alcohols. As expected, 2 mol% of Ni (in
[2] A. Fürstner, N. Shi, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 12349 – 12357.
[
3] a) C. Chen, K. Tagami, Y. Kishi, J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 5386 –
5387; b) Y. Kishi, Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 6239 – 6258; c) H. S.
Schrekker, M. W. G. de Bolster, R. V. A. Orru, L. A. Wessjo-
hann, J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 1975 – 1981.
the form of NiCl ) was required for the coupling reaction to
2
[
2]
occur efficiently. Under these reaction conditions, the
addition of E-1-iodohex-1-ene[ to the PMB-protected 3-
hydroxypropanal test system afforded the corresponding E-
allylic alcohol adduct in an unoptimized 59% yield with
17]
[
4] For asymmetric versions of the NHK reaction using stoichio-
metric amounts of chiral organochromium agents, see: a) B.
Cazes, C. Verniere, J. GorØ, Synth. Commun. 1983, 13, 73 – 79;
b) K. Sugimoto, S. Aoyagi, C. Kibayashi, J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62,
[
18]
7
5% ee (Table 1, entry 7). Likewise, the vinyl triflate
(
entry 8, Table 1) added to this same aldehyde to produce
2322 – 2323; and ref. [3a].
the isomeric allylic alcohol with 61% ee. Notably, these last
two addition reactions represent the first examples of
synthetically useful levels of asymmetric induction being
realized for catalytic, enantioselective NHK reactions of
vinylic halide and triflate substrates.
[
5] a) M. Bandini, P. G. Cozzi, P. Melchiorre, A. Umani-Ronchi,
Angew. Chem. 1999, 111, 3558 – 3561; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
1999, 38, 3357 – 3359; b) M. Bandini, P. G. Cozzi, A. Umani-
Ronchi, Polyhedron 2000, 19, 537 – 539; c) M. Bandini, P. G.
Cozzi, A. Umani-Ronchi, Angew. Chem. 2000, 112, 2417 – 2420;
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 2327 – 2330; d) M. Bandini, P. G.
Cozzi, A. Umani-Ronchi, Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 835 – 843; e) M.
Bandini, P. G. Cozzi, P. Melchiorre, S. Morganti, A. Umani-
Ronchi, Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1153 – 1155; f) After submission of
this manuscript, a report by Kishi et al. on a catalytic enantio-
selective process using an oxazoline sulfonamide ligand
appeared: H.-W. Choi, K. Nakajima, D. Demeke, F.-A. Kang,
H.-S. Jun, Z.-K. Wan, Y. Kishi, Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 4435 – 4438.
However, the enantioselectivities reported are not as high as our
best examples.
In summary, we have demonstrated that our DIANANE-
based salen ligands, (S,S)-5 and (R,R)-5, promote efficient
and highly enantioselective catalytic Nozaki–Hiyama–Kishi
reactions. With this novel ligand modification, the addition of
various organochromium intermediates to aromatic and
aliphatic aldehydes proceeded under catalytic conditions
with good levels of stereoinduction (up to 92% ee). Notably,
the asymmetric additions of allyl iodide and, in particular,
vinyl halides and triflates to aldehydes were achieved with
useful levels of enantioselectivity. We are currently exploring
the generality and functional-group compatibility of this
catalytic carbon–carbon bond-forming process, together with
examining its utility with chiral substrates, in the context of
projected applications to the stereocontrolled synthesis of
more complex structures, such as those that occur in polyke-
tide natural products.
[
[
6] For a review of applications of Cr–salen complexes in asym-
metric catalysis, see: M. Bandini, P. G. Cozzi, A. Umani-Ronchi,
Chem. Commun. 2002, 919 – 927.
7] For two examples, see: a) X.-G. Zhou, J.-S. Huang, X.-Q. Yu, Z.-
Y. Zhou, C.-M. Che, J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 2000, 1075 –
1080; b) D. Seebach, A. K. Beck, A. Heckel, Angew. Chem.
2001, 113, 96 – 142; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 92 – 138.
[
[
8] a) T. Hayashi, Acta Chem. Scand. 1996, 50, 259 – 266; b) A.
Weissfloch, R. Azerad, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1994, 2, 493 – 500.
9] R. T. Hawkins, R. S. Hsu, S. G. Wood, J. Org. Chem. 1978, 43,
4648 – 4650.
Experimental Section
[10] Afull account of the synthesis and configurational assignment of
(þ)- and (ꢀ)-DIANANE (9) will be published elsewhere.
[11] K. Ishihara, M. Mouri, Q. Gao, T. Maruyama, K. Furuta, H.
Yamamoto, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 11490 – 11495.
[12] A. B. Smith III, K. P. Minibiole, P. R. Verhoest, M. Schelhaas, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 10942 – 10953.
Typical Procedure: Anhydrous THF (1 mL) was added to CrCl
3
(4.0 mg, 25.0 mmol) and Mn (42 mg, 750 mmol) in a dried Schlenk
tube under argon, and the mixture was stirred for 1 h at room
temperature. After addition of the ligand (S,S)-5 (14.0 mg, 25.0 mmol)
and anhydrous NEt3 (7 mL, 5.0 mg, 50 mmol), the suspension was
stirred for another hour at room temperature.[ Finally, allyl bromide
was added (32 mL, 45.4 mg, 375 mmol). After 1 h, the mixture was
19]
[13] V. K. Tandon, A. M. van Leusen, H. Wynberg, J. Org. Chem.
1983, 48, 2767 – 2769.
cooled to 58C, PhCHO (25 mL, 26.2 mg, 250 mmol) and Me SiCl
[14] Y. Wu, L. Esser, J. K. De Brabander, Angew. Chem. 2000, 112,
4478 – 4480; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 4308 – 4310.
3
(48 mL, 41.2 mg, 380 mmol) were added, and the suspension was
1
034
ꢀ 2003 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
1433-7851/03/4209-1034 $ 20.00+.50/0
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, No. 9