meta-, and para-position of the phenyl ring to the same
reaction conditions (Table 1).
(Table 1, entries 9-12), little or no pinacolboronate was
obtained, in accordance with literature observations.6
We observed a high difference in the yields among phenyl
bromides having electron-donating or -withdrawing groups.
In previous studies such a strong reactivity difference was
It should be noted that the yields using DPEphos are
significantly higher in the case of phenyl bromides with
electron-donating substituents compared to previous re-
sults using the more expensive dppf ligand or the biphenyl
ligand 4 (see Table 1, entries 1, 3, and 15). Contrarily, dppf
gave higher yields in the case of the unsubstituted bro-
mobenzene (Table 1, entry 7). The borylation of a sterically
hindered phenyl bromide, mesityl bromide, afforded with
DPEphos the corresponding mesityl pinacolboronate in a
yield of 25% (Table 1, entry 8). In contrast, Baudoin showed
that the analogous 2,6-dimethylbromobenzene could be
6
b
never observed. Although it is known that the presence of
powerful electron-withdrawing substituents such as NO
2
10
induces the reductive dehalogenation of the aryl halide, the
yields among aryl halides having electron-donating or
-withdrawing groups were not substantially affected by their
substituents. In contrast, in our studies we observed very low
yields for aryl halides having electron-withdrawing substit-
uents and high yields in the case of electron-donor-substituted
ones.
Thus, 2-bromoanisol, 3-bromoanisol, and 4-bromoanisol
gave the corresponding boronates in yields of 78%, 27%,
and 99%, respectively (Table 1, entries 1-3). The same holds
converted into the corresponding boronate using the ligand
8
4
in a yield of 51%. The same borylation using dppf as
8
ligand gave only very poor yields (<5%) of boronate. Thus,
the borylation of sterically hindered bromides works par-
ticularly well with higher yields and under milder conditions
with the ligand 4, as shown by Baudoin.
2
for the NMe -substituted phenyl bromides. N,N-(Dimeth-
ylamino)-3-bromoaniline and N,N-(dimethylamino)-4-bro-
moaniline afforded the m- and p-phenyl boronates in 63%
and 96% yield, respectively (Table 1, entries 14 and 15). In
both cases the strong electron-donor capacity (+M-effect)
With these results in hand, we thought that this methodol-
ogy could be extended to the synthesis of unsymmetrically
substituted biphenyls via a one-pot, two-step Suzuki-
Miyaura cross-coupling reaction. This was indeed achieved
by adding after completion of the borylation step the needed
ingredients in the same reaction flask (Table 2).
2
of the substituent (OMe and NMe ), being only effective in
the ortho- and para-position, leads to the high yields with
these derivatives. In contrast, only low yields were obtained
for the unactivated meta-substituted phenyl bromides. As a
result of the strong steric hindrance in the case of N,N-
(
dimethylamino)-2-bromoaniline, no borylation can be ob-
Table 2. One-Pot, Two-Step Synthesis of Biphenyls 5a
served in this case (Table 1, entry 13).
Next we studied the borylation of Me-substituted phenyl
bromides. As expected, the Me-group as an inductive
electron-donor substituent (+I-effect) activates strongly the
ortho- and to a small extent the meta-substituted phenyl
bromide. Both 2- and 3-bromotoluene afforded the corre-
sponding boronates in 84% and 70% yield, respectively
(Table 1, entries 16 and 17). The para-substituted derivative,
4-bromotoluene, being not activated, is formed in a poor yield
of 36% (Table 1, entry 18). This result can be compared to
the borylation of the unsubstituted bromobenzene (Table 1,
entry 7, 33%).
entry
product
yield (%)
With phenyl bromides bearing electron-withdrawing sub-
stituents such as bromonitrobenzene or bromobenzonitrile
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
5a
5b
5c
5d
5e
5f
62
72
51
73
58
90
80
(4) (a) Matteson, D. S. In The Chemistry of the Metal-Carbon Bond;
Hartley, F. R., Patai, S., Eds.; Wiley: New York, 1987; Vol. 4, p 307. (b)
Vaultier, M.; Carboni, B. In ComprehensiVe Organometallic Chemistry II;
Abel, E. W., Stone, F. G. A., Wilkinson, G., Eds.; Pergamon: Oxford, 1995;
Vol. 11, p 191. (c) Miyaura, N.; Maruoka, K. In Synthesis of Organometallic
Compounds; Komiya, S., Ed.; Wiley: New York, 1997; p 345.
5g
a
Conditions: (1) Et3N (3.0 equiv), 2 (2.0 equiv), Pd(OAc)2 (5 mol %),
dioxane, 100 °C, 3 h; (2) bromide (1.0 equiv), Pd(OAc)2 (5 mol %), CsF
8 equiv), dioxane, 100 °C, 20 h.
(
5) (a) Ishiyama, T.; Murata, M.; Miyaura, N. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60,
(
7
1
508. (b) Ishiyama, T.; Itoh, Y.; Kitano, T.; Miyaura, N. Tetrahedron Lett.
997, 38, 3447.
(
6) (a) Murata, M.; Watanabe, S.; Masuda, Y. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62,
6
458. (b) Murata, M.; Oyama, T.; Watanabe, S.; Masuda, Y. J. Org. Chem.
2
000, 65, 164.
Thus, the borylation of 4-bromo-N,N-dimethylaniline in
(7) (a) Tucker, C. E.; Davidson, J.; Knochel, P. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57,
the above conditions (100 °C, 3 h) was followed by addition
of excess CsF (8 equiv), Pd(OAc) (5 mol %), and the second
3
482. (b) Pereira, S.; Srebnik, M. Organometallics 1995, 14, 3127. (c)
Pereira, S.; Srebnik, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 909. (d) Pereira, S.;
Srebnik, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 3283. (e) Murata, M.; Watanabe,
S.; Masuda, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 2585.
2
aryl bromide (2-bromotoluene, 4-bromotoluene, 2-bromoben-
zonitrile, 4-bromobenzonitrile, 2-bromonitrobenzene, and
4-bromonitrobenzene, respectively). The corresponding bi-
phenyls were obtained in high yields (Table 2). Similarly,
4-bromoanisole was cross-coupled with 4-bromobenzonitrile.
(
8) Baudoin, O.; Gu e´ nard, D.; Gu e´ ritte, F. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 9268.
(9) Kranenburg, M.; van der Burgt, Y. E. M.; Kamer, P. C. J.; van
Leeuwn, P. W. N. M.; Goubitz, K.; Fraanje, J. Organometallics 1995, 14,
081.
10) Echavarrene, A. M.; Stille, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 1557.
3
(
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 24, 2004
4421