10.1002/ejoc.201900046
European Journal of Organic Chemistry
COMMUNICATION
The direct comparison of the 1H NMR spectra of 6ut and 6
indicates the presence and the localization of DB24C8 around the
ammonium station in 6 (Fig. 2 a, b). Firstly, the signals
corresponding to the methylene hydrogen atoms HC-E of the
DB24C8 are split in 6, because these hydrogen atoms are facing
the two non-symmetrical ends of the thread. With respect to 6ut,
the chemical shifts of the hydrogen atoms H7 and H9 appeared
downfield in the [2]rotaxane 6 (Δδ = 0.38 and 0.26 ppm,
respectively) as a result of their hydrogen-bonding interactions
with the oxygen atoms of the DB24C8. At the same time, the
hydrogen atoms H10, H12 and H20 are all more or less shifted
upfield in 6 (Δδ = -0.16, -0.22 and -0.21 ppm, respectively), due
to their localization in the shielding cavity of the aromatic rings of
the DB24C8. The same trend of chemical shift variation is
observed for hydrogen atoms H1, H4, H5 (Δδ = -0.05, -0.16, -0.06
ppm, respectively), due to the stabilization of the cationic charge
of the ammonium moiety by the crown ether. The direct
comparison between the 1H NMR spectra of 6 and 7 indicates the
shuttling of the DB24C8 and its new localization around the
Weinreb amide site in the carbamoylated [2]rotaxane 7 (Fig. 2 b,
c). The hydrogen atoms H7 and H9 are logically shifted upfield in
7 (Δδ = -0.13 and -0.30 ppm, respectively) because of the N-
carbamoylation and the leaving of DB24C8. Simultaneously, the
hydrogen atoms neighbouring the Weinreb amide H12 and H13 are
shifted downfield in 7 (Δδ = 0.73 and 0.62 ppm, respectively),
because of their hydrogen-bonding interactions with the oxygen
atoms of the DB24C8. The hydrogen atoms H15, H17, H18 and H19
are all shifted upfield in 7 (Δδ = -0.28, -0.31, -0.31 and -0.27 ppm,
respectively) because they undergo the shielding effect of the
aromatic rings of DB24C8. The localization of the DB24C8 around
the Weinreb site in 7 is confirmed thanks to the comparison
between the 1H NMR spectra of the [2]rotaxane 7 and its
uncomplexed thread 7ut (Fig. 3 c, d). Indeed, the same trend of
chemical shift displacements is observed concerning the
hydrogen atoms that are implicated in hydrogen bonding (i.e. in 7,
H12 and H13 are shifted downfield with Δδ = 0.56 and 0.45 ppm,
respectively) or shielded by the aromatic rings of DB24C8 (i.e. in
7, H15, H17, H18 and H19 are shifted upfield with Δδ = -0.33, -0.31,
-0.21 and -0.21 ppm, respectively).
the use of a larger excess of Grignard reagent (up to 5 equiv.)
and/or at higher temperature (up to 50°C), did not yield to any
improvement even after 4 days. This demonstrates the high
efficacy of the protection of a Weinreb amide moiety by a
surrounding DB24C8.
Conclusions
In conclusion, we have reported the synthesis of a new molecular
shuttle that contains an ammonium and a Weinreb amide stations
for the DB24C8. The DB24C8 was localized around the best
ammonium station at the protonated state. The sole
deprotonation of the ammonium station did not trigger the
shuttling of the DB24C8 because of the too weak affinity of the
Weinreb amide for the macrocycle, this latter interacting better
with the amine site. Nevertheless, Weinreb amide proved to act
as an efficient secondary molecular station for the DB24C8 after
N-carbamoylation of the deprotonated ammonium. In this case,
the DB24C8 shuttles around the amide site, where it acts as a
protective shield that prevents the Weinreb amide from any attack
by Grignard reagent. Using a macrocycle as a temporary
protection of specific sites of an encircled axle might be valuable
for the post-interlocking multi-step modification of rotaxanes.
Acknowledgments
We thank the ”Agence Nationale de la Recherche” for funding this
research under the project ANR-17-CE07-0014-01.
Keywords: rotaxane • molecular shuttle • Weinreb amide •
dibenzo-24-crown-8 • protective group
[1]
[2]
C. Bruns, J. F. Stoddart, The Nature of the Mechanical Bond: From
Molecules to Machines, John Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken, NJ, 2017.
a) M. Deska, J. Kozlowska, W. Sliwa, Arkivoc, 2013, (i), 294-332; b) M.
Xue, Y. Yang, X. Chi, X. Yan, F. Huang, Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 7398-
7501; c) S. Erbas-Cakmak, D. A. Leigh, C. T. McTernan, A. L.
Nussbaumer, Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 10081-10206; d) G. Yu, B. C. Yung,
Z. Zhou, Z. Mao, X. Chen, ACS Nano, 2018, 12, 7-12.
Beyond the synthesis of a new pH-sensitive Weinreb amide-
containing molecular shuttle, we envisaged the cleavage of the
encircled axle of 7 by a Grignard reagent (Scheme 1). Post-
interlocking modification of such amide-containing rotaxanes
could be of interest for the synthesis of challenging rotaxanes
such as those that do not contain any efficient template site.[17]
Indeed, this chemical route, which would use the methoxyamine
4 as a translocator[17-18] of DB24C8, would allow the access to
rotaxanes that consists of an encircled ketone-containing axle,
nay a hydrocarbon axle after subsequent reduction of the ketone
moiety to a methylene unit. As a model experiment, the dropwise
addition of 2 equiv. of the 3,5-dimethylphenylmagnesium bromide
(0.5 M solution in Me-THF) on a solution of the molecular thread
7ut in THF was achieved at 0°C and the mixture was allowed to
warm up until room temperature and stirred for 17h. The ketone-
containing molecular thread 8ut was obtained in a 70% yield after
silica gel flash chromatographic purification. Unfortunately, the
experiment in the same experimental conditions on the rotaxane
analogue 7 did not provide any expected ketone compound. In
the interlocked compound 7, the DB24C8 acts as a protective
shield around the Weinreb amide and prevents from any cleavage
of the axle.[19] Operating in harder experimental conditions, like
[3]
[4]
C. J. Bruns, J. F. Stoddart, Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47, 2186-2199.
C. O. Dietrich-Buchecker, J. -P. Sauvage, J. P. Kintzinger, Tetrahedron
Lett. 1983, 1, 5095-5098.
[5]
a) L. Zhang, V. Marcos, D. Leigh, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2018, 115,
9397-9404; b) E. R. Kay, D. A. Leigh, F. Zerbetto, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2007, 46, 72-191; c) J. -P. Sauvage, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56,
11080-11093.
[6]
[7]
M. Baroncini, L. Casimiro, C. de Vet, J. Groppi, S. Silvi, A. Credi,
ChemistryOpen, 2018, 7, 169-179
a) S. Nahm, S. M. Weinreb, Tetrahedron Lett. 1981, 22, 3815-3818; b)
S. Balasubramaniam, I. Singh Aidhen, Synthesis, 2008, 23, 3707-3738.
E. A. Neal, S. M. Goldup, Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 5128-5142.
R. Neelarapu, P. A. Petukhov, Tetrahedron, 2012, 68, 7056-7062.
[8]
[9]
[10] a) L. Malaprade, Compt. Rend. 1928, 186, 382-384; b) L. Malaprade,
Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1928, 43, 683-696.
[11] C. R. Harrison, P. Hodge, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1982, 509-511.
[12] R. Vanderesse, L. Thevenet, M. Marraud, N. Bogetto, M. Reboud, C.
Cordier, J. Peptide Sci. 2003, 9, 282-299.
[13] For [4] = 10-2 M, with 1.5 equiv. of DB24C8, an equilibrium constant K of
about 3600 M-1 was calculated.
[14] R. Schwesinger, J. Willaredt, H. Schlemper, M. Keller, D. Schmitt, H.
Fritz, Chem. Ber. 1994, 127, 2435-2454.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.