+
Stabilization and Dissociation of C9H12 Ions
J. Phys. Chem. A, Vol. 108, No. 45, 2004 9659
To compare the predicted krec,∞(T) with the measured k8 from
section 3, the equilibrium constant was calculated as
are also of similar magnitude as found for the corresponding
excited neutral molecules.
The conversion of specific rate constants k(E) into high-
pressure thermal dissociation rate constants kdiss,∞(T) was per-
formed by unimolecular rate theory in the form of SACM/CT
calculations. As kdiss,∞(T) has a particularly large temperature
dependence, these quantities also allowed us to confirm the
+
Keq ) ([C7H7 ][C2H5]/[C9H12+])eq ) kdiss/krec (4.9)
and kdiss,∞(T) was obtained by combining Keq with krec,∞. It then
has to be decided whether the measured k8 is less than the high-
pressure limiting dissociation rate constant kdiss,∞ because of
falloff effects. For internal consistency, we calculated Keq with
the DFT frequencies from ref 15, keeping in mind that the
largest uncertainty stems from the bond energy E0 which, as
before, was taken to be E0/hc ) 13 950 cm-1. In this way,
between 500 and 600 K, we obtained
+
dissociation energy of C9H12 as 166.9 ((2.2) kJ mol-1 (at 0
K). The given analysis provided an intrinsically consistent
description of rate parameters such that it may serve as an
example for subsequent studies of other chemical/thermal
activation reactions of excited molecular ions.
Acknowledgment. This project was funded by the United
States Air Force Office of Scientific Research under Project
2303EP4 and Grant Award FA8655-03-1-3034. Financial sup-
port by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 357 “Mole-
kulare Mechanismen unimolekularer Reaktionen”) is also
gratefully acknowledged.
Keq
)
1.67 × 1027(T/600 K)-0.33 exp(-E0/kT) molecule cm-3
(4.10)
References and Notes
To assess falloff effects, we calculated limiting low-pressure
rate constants kdiss,0 following the conventional method described
in ref 26. The relevant quantities entering kdiss,0 are Z ) 6.5 ×
10-10 cm3 molecule-1 s-1, âc ≈ 0.2, the vibrational density of
states Fvib(E0) ) 5.4 × 1014/cm-1, the vibrational partition
(1) Williams, S.; Midey, A. J.; Arnold, S. T.; Morris, R. A.; Viggiano,
A. A.; Chiu, Y.-H.; Levandier, D. J.; Dressler, R. A.; Berman, M. R. J.
Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 10336.
(2) Arnold, S. T.; Williams, S.; Dotan, I.; Midey, A. J.; Morris, R. A.;
Viggiano, A. A. J. Phys. Chem. A 1999, 103, 8421.
(3) Arnold, S. T.; Dotan, I.; Williams, S.; Viggiano, A. A.; Morris, R.
A. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 928.
(4) Viggiano, A. A.; Miller, T. M.; William, S.; Arnold, S. T.; Seeley,
J. V.; Friedman, J. F. J. Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106, 11917.
(5) Midey, A. J.; Williams, S.; Arnold, S. T.; Viggiano, A. A. J. Phys.
Chem. A 2000, 106, 11726.
(6) Fridgen, T. D.; McMahon, T. B.; Troe, J.; Viggiano, A. A.; Midey,
A. J.; Williams, S. J. Phys. Chem. A 2004, 108, 5600.
(7) Troe, J.; Viggiano, A. A.; Williams, S. J. Phys. Chem. A 2004,
108, 1574.
function Qvib(603 K) ) 8.2 × 105, FE(600 K) ≈ 1.6, and Frot
≈
F
rot,max(603 K) ≈ 5.3. Combining kdiss,∞ ) krec,∞Keq from eqs
4.8-4.10 with the derived kdiss,0 indicates that the center of the
falloff curve kdiss,0([M]) ) kdiss,∞ at 600 K is located near
[N2]center ≈ 4 × 1013 molecule cm-3. Falloff curves connecting
kdiss,0 with kdiss,∞ have been illustrated in refs 26 and 27 for
systems of comparable size. On this basis, one can safely assume
that the measured k8 corresponds to the high-pressure rate
constant kdiss,∞ within a few percent. The absence of an
observable pressure dependence in Table 2 confirms this
conclusion.
(8) Kim, Y. H.; Choe, J. C.; Kim, M. J. Phys. Chem. A 2001, 105,
5751.
(9) Malow, M.; Penno, M.; Weitzel, K.-M. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003,
107, 10625.
(10) Troe, J. J. Phys. Chem. 1983, 87, 1800.
Combining the modeled krec,∞ with Keq from eqs 4.8-4.10
predicts
(11) Miasek, P. G.; Harrison, A. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 714.
(12) Ahmed, M. S.; Dunbar, R. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 3215.
(13) Barfknecht, A. T.; Brauman, J. I. J. Chem. Phys. 1986, 84, 3870.
Boering, K. A.; Brauman, J. I. J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 97, 5439.
(14) Fernandez, A.; Viggiano, A. A.; Miller, T. M.; Williams, S.; Troe,
J. J. Phys. Chem., to be submitted.
(15) Hwang, W. G.; Moon, J. H.; Choe, J. C.; Kim, M. S. J. Phys. Chem.
A 1998, 102, 7512. (a) One should note that the point with k(E) ) 3.4 ×
104 s-1 may not be a true experimental point; its energy E/hc ) 18 390
cm-1 was “estimated from the rate-energy curve”, i.e., presumably from
the RRKM calculation in ref 15. However, our own RRKM calculation of
k(E) using the same activated complex frequencies gives values of k(E) at
E/hc ) 18 390 cm-1 which are markedly lower than 3.4 × 104 s-1; see
Figure 6.
(16) Arnold, S. T.; Seeley, J. V.; Williamson, J. S.; Mundis, P. L.;
Viggiano, A. A. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 5511.
(18) Rusyniak, M.; Ibrahim, Y.; Alsharaeh, E.; Meot-Ner (Mautner),
M.; El-Shall, M. S. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 7656.
(19) Hirschfelder, J. O.; Curtiss, C. F.; Bird, R. B. Molecular Theory of
Gases and Liquids; J. Wiley: New York, 1964. Miller, Th. M. In Handbook
of Chemistry and Physics; Lide, D. R., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL,
2003; Section 10, p 163.
k8 ) 1.34 × 1016(T/600 K)1.49 exp(-E0/kT) s-1 (4.11)
The prediction is remarkably close to our direct measurement
of k8 given by eq 3.7 with E0 ) 166.9 kJ mol-1. The difference
between krec,∞ and kLangevin in the modeling has been calibrated
by the difference between the measured k(E) and k(E) from PST
such that realistic values of k8 should have been produced. The
good agreement between the measured k8 from eq 3.7 and the
predicted k8 from eq 4.11 confirms the validity and internal
consistency of the described approach. The agreement between
the measured and the modeled value also supports the E0 value
of E0/hc ) 13 950 cm-1 (or E0 ) 166.9 kJ mol-1) used in the
analysis. The difference of a factor of 1.6 in k8 under our condi-
tions would correspond to a difference of about 190 cm-1 in
+
+
E0/hc. The energetics of the dissociation C9H12 f C7H7
C2H5, therefore, should be accurate to better than about 2.2 kJ
mol-1
+
.
(20) Troe, J.; Ushakov, V. G.; Viggiano, A. A.; Williams, S. J. Chem.
Phys., to be submitted.
(21) Hold, U.; Lenzer, Th.; Luther, K.; Reihs, K.; Symonds, A. C. J.
Chem. Phys. 2000, 112, 4090.
(22) Lenzer, Th.; Luther, K.; Reihs, K.; Symonds, A. C. J. Chem. Phys.
2000, 112, 4090.
(23) Grigoleit, U.; Lenzer, Th.; Luther, K.; Mu¨tzel, M.; Takahara, A.
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2001, 3, 2191.
(24) Troe, J.; Wieters, W. J. Chem. Phys. 1979, 71, 3931.
(25) Hippler, H.; Luther, K.; Troe, J.; Wendelken, H. J. J. Chem. Phys.
1983, 79, 239.
5. Conclusions
This study described charge transfer generating excited
+
+
C9H12 ions which then dissociate mainly to C7H7 ions and
C2H5 radicals. Calibrating S/D ratios for chemical activation
using literature values of the specific rate constants for dis-
sociation, absolute values for collisional stabilization rates were
obtained. From these quantities, average energies transferred
per collision ∆E /hc ) -200 ((100) cm-1 were derived for a
(26) Troe, J. J. Phys. Chem. 1979, 83, 114.
bath gas N2 at excitation energies near E/hc ) 32 000 cm-1
.
(27) Troe, J.; Ushakov, V. G. Faraday Discuss. 2001, 119, 145.
(28) Hamon, S.; Speck, T.; Mitchell, J. B. A.; Rowe, B. R.; Troe, J. J.
Chem. Phys. 2002, 117, 2557.
+
These values are similar to those measured for excited C8H10
ions, where ∆E /hc ) -285 ((150) cm-1 was obtained. They