Kinetics of Amide Formation
TABLE 3. Amide 4 and Diamide 5 Yieldsa
SCHEME 4. Synthetic Route to Amino Acid 3
molar equiv
of base
% methionine
free base
amide 4
% yield
diamide 5
% yield
base
DMA
NMM
NMM
NMM
Bu3N
NMeP
Et3N
3.2
1.3
2.1
3.2
2.1
3.2
3.2
3.2
1.0
29
6.6b
82
15.4
12.1
6.8
4.6
3.1
41.7
49.3
96.1
99.1
99.8
100
86.6
89.6
92.5
93.5
91.6c
(94)d
2.2
2.1
DBU
(0)d
a Solution yields (HPLC) based on acid consumed. b High level (42%)
HOBt ester. c Reaction terminated after 4 h at 65% completion. d Reaction
terminated after 3 h at 17% completion.
with suitable donors in NMP and related solvents, such as
dimethylformamide and dimethylsulfoxide.11,12
pH Dependence of Product Distribution. Although it is
clear from the results above that the overall kinetics of the amide
coupling reaction are determined by the rate of formation of
the O-acylisourea, the product distribution is controlled by the
subsequent formation of the HOBt ester and its reaction with
the amine (eqs 2 and 3, Scheme 1). In particular, at low pH
values, protonation of the methioninate amine group will reduce
the rate of the desired reaction relative to that of coupling with
the less basic amino group of acid, 3 (to give diamide 5), and
ultimately severely inhibit product formation. This is confirmed
by the yields of amide and diamide 5 in the various base
solutions given in Table 3.
Further work13 has shown that the conclusions from this work
are not unique to the current system. Thus reactions involving
a simple benzoic acid, rather than the present amino acid, again
show reaction rates independent of HOBt levels, high yields of
amide (>90%) in the presence of HOBt, but very poor
conversion to amide (<50%) in the absence of HOBt. As in
the present case, reaction rates fall off at high pH, but the
product yields do not show a dependence on pH because there
is no internal amino group to compete for the HOBt ester.
without further drying. The yield of nitrostilbene 7 was about
90%: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz, 300 K) δ 8.56 (d, J ) 2.1
Hz, 1H), 8.39 (dd, J ) 8.8, 2.6 Hz, 1H), 8.14 (d, J ) 8.8 Hz, 1H),
7.84 (d, J ) 16.4 Hz, 1H), 7.72-7.66 (m, 2H), 7.47 (d, J ) 16.8
Hz, 1H), 7.31-7.24 (m, 2H), 3.94 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6,
100 MHz, 300 K) δ 165.5, 162.4 (d, JFC ) 241.1 Hz), 145.7, 144.0,
134.0, 132.9 (d, J FCCCC ) 3.0 Hz), 129.3 (d, J FCCC ) 8.3 Hz, 2C),
129.2, 128.0, 126.4, 125.3, 124.4 (d, JFCCCCC ) 2.2 Hz), 115.9 (d,
J FCC ) 21.8 Hz, 2C), 52.8; IR νmax (KBr disc) 1728, 1585, 1505,
1331, 1227 cm-1
.
Preparation of Methyl 5-amino-2-[2-(4-fluorophenyl)ethyl]-
benzoate] (8). Methanol (216 kg) was added to a mixture of a
nitrostilbene (7) (60 kg of methanol-wet solid containing an
estimated 39 kg at 100% strength, 1.00 molar equiv) and 10%
palladium on carbon-wet paste (0.78 kg, 0.24 mol %). The mixture
was stirred and heated at 35 °C under a hydrogen atmosphere (3.0
bar gauge) for 2 h. When the reaction was complete, the mixture
was heated to 50 °C and passed through a filter aid to remove the
catalyst; the filter cake was washed with methanol (26 kg). The
total filtrate was diluted with water (56.7 kg), cooled to -5 °C
with stirring, and maintained at -5 °C for 30 min. The crystalline
product was collected by filtration, washed with a mixture of
methanol (23 kg) and water (28.7 kg), and dried at ambient
temperature and pressure. The yield of aminoester 8 (mean of four
batches) was 31.8 kg (88%): 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz, 300
K) δ 7.24-7.16 (m, 2H), 7.11-7.04 (m, 3H), 6.95 (d, J ) 8.4 Hz,
1H), 6.69 (dd, J ) 8.3, 2.6 Hz, 1H), 5.16 (br s, 2H), 3.80 (s, 3H),
2.99-2.92 (m, 2H), 2.76-2.68 (m, 2H); MS (ES) m/z 274.1 (M +
H)+.
Preparation of 5-Amino-2-[2-(4-fluorophenyl)ethyl]benzoic
acid (3). A mixture of aminoester 8 (73.3 kg, 1.00 molar equiv),
methanol (220 L), and 47% w/w sodium hydroxide solution (34.5
kg, 1.50 molar equiv) was stirred and heated at 60 °C for 6.5 h.
The solution was cooled to room temperature and adjusted to pH
5 using 1 M aqueous hydrochloric acid (402 L, about 1.50 molar
equiv). The precipitated solid was collected by filtration, washed
with water (2 × 147 L), and dried in vacuo at 40 °C. The yield of
acid 3 (mean of three batches) was 65.0 kg (93%): 1H NMR
(DMSO-d6, 400 MHz, 300 K) δ 7.25-7.17 (m, 2H), 7.11-7.02
(m, 3H), 6.90 (d, J ) 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.64 (dd, J ) 8.1, 2.6 Hz, 1H),
3.33 (br s, 1H), 3.01-2.93 (m, 2H), 2.77-2.69 (m, 2H); 13C NMR
(DMSO-d6, 100 MHz, 300 K) δ 169.2, 160.5 (d, JFC ) 241.1 Hz),
Experimental Section
5-Amino-2-[2-(4-fluorophenyl)ethyl]benzoic acid (3) was pre-
pared from 2-chloro-5-nitrobenzoic acid, via methyl 2[(E)-2-(4-
fluorophenyl)vinyl]-5-nitrobenzoate (7) and methyl 5-amino-2-[2-
(4-fluorophenyl)ethyl]benzoate (8), according to Scheme 4.
Preparation of Methyl 2[(E)-2-(4-fluorophenyl)vinyl]-5-ni-
trobenzoate (7). A mixture of methyl 5-nitro-2-chlorobenzoate
(31.0 kg, 1.00 molar equiv), sodium carbonate (16.0 kg, 1.05 molar
equiv), tetra-n-butylammonium bromide (4.65 kg, 0.10 molar
equiv), 4-fluorostyrene (22.0 kg, 1.25 molar equiv), and N,N-
dimethylacetamide (110 kg) was stirred at ambient temperature
under a nitrogen atmosphere. Palladium chloride (1.075 kg, 0.040
molar equiv) and triethyl phosphite (1.025 kg, 0.043 molar equiv)
were added, and the mixture was heated at 90 °C for 4 h. The hot
mixture was diluted with toluene (82.5 kg) and filtered to remove
catalyst and other insoluble material; the filter cake was washed
with hot toluene (34.5 kg). The total filtrate was concentrated by
distillation under reduced pressure until all of the toluene had been
removed. The residue was diluted with methanol (159 kg) and
cooled and stirred at -5 °C for 30 min. The crystalline product
was collected by filtration and washed with cold methanol (49 kg).
The methanol-wet solid (60 kg) was used directly in the next stage
146.6, 138.2 (d, JFCCCC ) 3.0 Hz), 131.4, 130.4, 129.9 (d, JFCCC
)
(12) Bordwell, F. G.; Branca, J. C.; Hughes, D. L.; Olmstead, W. N. J.
Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 3305.
(13) Chan, L. C. Unpublished results.
7.9 Hz, 2C), 129.3, 117.2, 115.5, 114.8 (d, JFCC ) 21.1 Hz, 2C),
37.0, 35.5; MS (ES) m/z 260.1 (M + H)+, 301 (MH + CH3CN)+.
J. Org. Chem, Vol. 72, No. 23, 2007 8867