good yields. It is worthy of note that it is not necessary to carry
out an oxidation step6 to obtain products since the dihydro
intermediates aromatized readily in the reaction medium or
upon aqueous work-up.
In these reactions, pyridine displayed particularly interesting
behavior. Whatever the conditions used (unreported here),
2,2Ј-bipyridine was obtained as a by-product. This side-
reaction could be expected according to our previous work.8b
Indeed, the reaction of BuLi–LiDMAE with pyridine at 0 ЊC
gave 82% of 2,2Ј-bipyridine after addition of THF. However,
2,2Ј-bipyridine was easily separated from 2a and 2b by classical
flash-chromatography.
On the other hand, quinoline which is known to be very
sensitive to nucleophilic attack by BuLi7a led surprisingly to the
lowest yields. This may be interpreted as a consequence of a
strong complexation of lithiopyridines by the formed com-
pounds 3a and 3b, weakening their nucleophilicity.6a
Finally, the method was also successful in the preparation
of symmetrical products leading to 6,6Ј-dimethoxy-2,2Ј-
bipyridine 6a in 58% yield. This result is far better than those
obtained in our previous work. Indeed, 6a was obtained in 30%
yield after addition of THF in a mixture of BuLi–LiDMAE
with 2-methoxypyridine.8a
In conclusion, we have shown that the direct conden-
sation of heterocycles with 2-heterosubstituted 6-lithiopyridines
is an efficient and simple method and has to be considered
for the synthesis of new and not easily accessible bis-hetero-
cycles.
Selected data
2b: δH 2.69 (s, 3H), 7.15 (d, J 8, 1H), 7.25 (dt, J 5 and 2, 1H),
7.57 (t, J 8, 1H), 7.75 (dt, J 8 and 2, 1H), 8.07 (d, J 8, 1H),
8.42 (d, J 8, 1H), 8.62 (d, J 4, 1H); δC 13.6, 117.1, 121.2,
121.3, 132.1, 136.5, 148.8, 155.3, 156.0, 157.1; m/z (CI) 203
(M ϩ Hϩ) (C11H10N2S requires C, 65.32; H, 4.98; N, 13.85.
Found: C, 65.45; H, 5.02; N, 14.16%); 3b: δH 2.69 (s, 3H), 7.32
(d, J 8, 1H), 7.68 (t, J 7.5, 1H), 8.21 (d, J 7.5, 1H), 8.40 (d, J 4.5,
1H), 8.87 (d, J 4.5, 1H), 9.30 (s, 1H); δC 13.6, 117.5, 117.8,
124.0, 137.2, 153.6, 158.3, 159.1, 160.3, 162.9; m/z (CI)
204 (M ϩ Hϩ) (C10H9N3S requires C, 59.09; H, 4.46; N, 20.67.
Found: C, 59.16; H, 4.73; N, 20.32%); 4b: δH 2.65 (s, 3H), 7.26
(d, J 8, 1H), 7.63 (t, J 7.5, 1H), 8.05 (d, J 7.5, 1H), 8.59 (br
s, 2H), 9.68 (s, 1H); δC 13.5, 116.6, 122.9, 137.1, 143.7, 143.9,
144.8, 151.2, 154.0, 160.0; m/z (CI) 204 (M ϩ Hϩ) (C10H9N3S
requires C, 59.09; H, 4.46; N, 20.67. Found: C, 59.36; H,
4.61; N, 20.43%). 6b: δH 2.57 (s, 3H), 4.18 (s, 3H), 6.50 (dd, J 8
and 1, 1H), 6.85 (dd, J 7.5 and 1, 1H), 7.45 (t, J 7, 1H), 7.46 (t,
J 8 and 2, 1H), 8.30 (dd, J 7.5 and 1, 1H), 8.40 (dd, J 7.2 and 1,
1H); δC 12.3, 54.4, 113.1, 117.1, 120.5, 125.4, 132.8, 135.6,
153.4, 155.9, 156.3, 161.3; m/z (CI) 233 (M ϩ Hϩ) (C12H12N2OS
requires C, 62.07; H, 5.15; N, 12.07. Found: C, 62.36; H, 4.97;
N, 12.18%).
References
1 T. Kambara, T. Koshida, N. Saito, I. Kuwajima, K. Kubata and
T. Yamamoto, Chem. Lett., 1992, 583.
2 K. V. Rao, K. Biemann and R. B. Woodward, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1963, 85, 2532.
Experimental
3 T. Meyer, Acc. Chem. Res., 1989, 22, 165.
4 (a) P. E. Fanta, Chem. Rev., 1964, 64, 613; (b) A. L. Papet and
A. Marsura, Synthesis, 1993, 478; (c) Y. Fort, S. Becker and
P. Caubère, Tetrahedron, 1994, 50, 11893.
5 (a) Y. Yamamoto, Y. Azuma and H. Mitoh, Synthesis, 1986, 564;
(b) V. Kalin, Synthesis, 1991, 413; (c) Y. Yamamoto, T. Tanaka,
M. Yagi and M. Inamoto, Heterocycles, 1996, 42, 189.
6 (a) T. Kauffmann, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1979, 18, 1;
(b) G. Newkome and D. Hager, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.,
1981, 858; (c) R. Van der Stoel, H. Van der Plas and H. Jogejan,
Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas, 1983, 102, 364.
7 (a) J. Verbeck, A. George, R. de Jong and L. Brandsma, J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun., 1984, 257; (b) E. W. Thomas, J. Org. Chem.,
1986, 51, 2184.
8 (a) P. Gros, Y. Fort and P. Caubère, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1,
1997, 20, 3071; (b) P. Gros, Y. Fort and P. Caubère, J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1, 1997, 24, 3597.
All new compounds have been satisfactorily characterized [1H
NMR (400 MHz), 13C NMR (100 MHz), MS and elemental
analysis].
Typical experimental procedure
To a solution of 2-dimethylaminoethanol (720 mg, 16 mmol) in
hexane (10 mL) cooled at 0 ЊC, was added dropwise BuLi (1.6
M solution in hexane, 20 mL, 32 mmol). After 15 min, a solu-
tion of 2-methoxypyridine (436 mg, 4 mmol) in hexane (10 mL)
was added dropwise (10 min) and the reaction mixture stirred at
0 ЊC for 1 h. The orange solution was cooled at Ϫ20 ЊC and a
solution of pyrimidine (1.28 g, 16 mmol) in THF (40 mL) was
added dropwise, and the mixture stirred for 1 h at 0 ЊC and 1 h
at room temperature. Hydrolysis was performed at 0 ЊC with
water (20 mL). After aqueous work-up, the organic layer was
dried (MgSO4) and the solvents evaporated. The residue was
purified on a Chromatotron (AcOEt–hexane, 5:95), yielding
463 mg (62%) of 3a. δH 4.06 (s, 3H), 6.88 (d, J 8, 1H), 7.74 (t,
J 7.5, 1H), 8.11 (d, J 7.5, 1H), 8.33 (d, J 5, 1H), 8.84 (d, J 5, 1H),
9.26 (s, 1H); δC 53.8, 113.9, 115.1, 117.6, 139.9, 151.5, 158.0,
158.9, 163.1, 164.1; m/z (CI) 188 (M ϩ Hϩ) (C10H9N3O requires
C, 64.16; H, 4.85; N, 22.45. Found: C, 64.25; H, 5.17; N,
22.12%).
9 (a) Y. Fort, Tetrahedron Lett., 1995, 36, 6051; (b) E. Brenner and
Y. Fort, Tetrahedron Lett., 1998, 39, 5359.
10 This amount of basic reagent was also found as necessary in the
metallation of nitrogen-containing heterocycles by LiTMP. See for
example, N. Plé, A. Turck, K. Couture and G. Queguiner, J. Org.
Chem., 1995, 60, 3781.
11 P. M. Pojer and L. A. Summers, J. Heterocycl. Chem., 1974, 11, 303.
12 R. Held, F. Dietz and P. Thomas, Z. Chem., 1972, 12, 346.
Communication 8/07161F
3516
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1998, 3515–3516