2
T. H. Graham / Tetrahedron Letters xxx (2015) xxx–xxx
Table 3
then subjected to similar conditions and afforded benzimidazole
(3) in nearly quantitative yield (entry 3). Control reactions using
hydrogen instead of triethylsilane as the reductant resulted in
the recovery of a majority of the unreacted starting materials
(entries 4 and 5) and only a trace of benzimidazole was isolated
from 1b.12 McMurray reported conditions for the reductive
removal of benzyl protecting groups using Pd/C and large excesses
of triethylsilane with methanol as the reaction solvent.13 These
conditions resulted in the recovery of unreacted starting material
and only a trace of benzimidazole (entry 6).14 The results indicate
that the triethylsilane and Pd/C system has exceptional reactivity
for the debenzylation of protected benzimidazole. In addition,
the use of an aprotic solvent such as tetrahydrofuran is unique
from previous reports of debenzylation methods using tri-
ethylsilane and Pd/C.
Effect of substitution at the 2-position of the benzimidazole
Et3SiH
Pd/C
N
N
N
R
R
N
H
THF, rt
Bn
6
7
Entry
R
Yield (%) in 7 (6)a
1
2
3
4
5
6
Me
Ph
t-Bu
3 (96)
1 (94)
7 (87)
67 (9)
(88)
N(Me)2
NHEt
OMe
14 (42)
a
Isolated yields after purification by chromatography on silica gel; parentheses
indicate recovered starting material.
Having identified the triethylsilane–Pd/C system as a unique
and mild method for the deprotection of N-benzylbenzimidazole,
the scope of the transformation was studies (Table 2). The trans-
formation tolerated electron donating and electron withdrawing
groups and was mostly unaffected by substituents at the 4- to 7-
ring positions. Notable exceptions were the 4-methoxycarbonyl
(entry 11) and the 4-methyl (entry 13) substituents that resulted
in a majority of the starting material being recovered and sug-
gested that sterics may influence the progress of the reaction.15
Substitution at the 2-position of the benzimidazole was also
studied (Table 3). Methyl, phenyl, and tert-butyl substitution
afforded only traces of the deprotected benzimidazole and a major-
ity of the starting material was recovered (entries 1–3). With N-
benzyl-2-dimethylaminobenzimidazole, the desired product was
obtained in 67% yield and 9% of the starting material was recovered
(entry 4). In contrast, N-benzyl-2-ethylaminobenzimidazole
afforded only recovered starting material, a result that may be
explained by the steric congestion from the in situ triethylsi-
lylation of the 2-ethylamino substituent (i.e., N–H to N–TES) (entry
5).11 N-Benzyl-2-methoxybenzimidazole was deprotected to a
minor extent with a poor recovery of the unreacted starting
material (entry 6). The results indicate that substitution at the 2-
position of the benzimidazole is detrimental to the progress of
the debenzylation.
The scope of the debenzylation was also studied with imida-
zoles to gain additional understanding of the factors that influence
the reactivity (Table 4). N-Benzylimidazole was rapidly depro-
tected in 2 h to afford imidazole in 92% yield (entry 1).16 The
deprotection of N-benzyl-2-methylimidazole required 24 h for
completion and afforded the product in 97% yield (entry 2).17 The
4- or 5-methylimidazole analogs (3:1 mixture) were efficiently
debenzylated in 12 h (entry 3). Phenyl substitutions at the 2- or
4-positions, as well as methyl substitution at both the 2- and
4-positions, were detrimental to the efficiency of the reaction
(entries 4–6). These results suggest that increasing steric con-
straint on the ring system leads to a decrease in reaction efficiency.
To demonstrate the chemoselectivity and the sensitivity of this
reaction to steric influences, the following competition
experiments were conducted (Scheme 1).
A
mixture of
Table 4
Deprotection of imidazoles
Et3SiH
R2
R3
R2
R3
N
N
N
Pd/C
R1
R1
THF, rt
N
H
9
Bn
8
Table 2
Entry
R1
R2
R3
Yield (%) in 9 (8)a
Effect of substitution at the 4- to 7-positions of the benzimidazole
1
H
Me
H
Ph
H
Me
H
H
Me/H
H
Ph
Me
H
H
H/Me
H
H
92
97
99
45 (52)
(92)
16 (78)
R1
R1
2
Et3SiH
Pd/C
3b
4
R2
R3
R2
R3
N
N
N
N
H
5
6
THF,rt
R4
R4
H
Bn
4
5
a
Isolated yields after purification by chromatography on silica gel; parentheses
indicate recovered starting material.
Entry
R1
R2
R3
R4
Yield (%) in 5 (4)a
b
Starting material was a 3:1 mixture of the 4-methyl and 5-methyl isomers.
1
H
H
H/F
H
H
H
OMe
H
H
H
Me
F
H
Cl
CF3
H
H
OMe
H
H
H
Me
F
H
Cl
H
CF3
H
H
OMe
H
H
H
H
H
F/H
H
H
H
H
H
H
OMe
H
CO2Me
H
92
97
94
92
94
94
99
99
99
96
(91)
92
6 (92)
99
2
3b
4
Et3SiH
Pd/C
N
N
N
N
N
5
6
7
8
R
Ph
N
H
THF
rt, 14 h
Bn
Bn
R = Ph or H
1:1 mixture
90%
97%
9
R1
Me
10
11
12
13
14
Et3SiH
Pd/C
N
N
N
CO2Me
H
Me
H
H
H
H
N
H
N
N
THF
rt, 14 h
H
H
Me
95%
Bn
Bn
R2
Me
R1/R2 = Me/H or H/Me
1:1 mixture
95%
a
Isolated yields after purification by chromatography on silica gel; parentheses
indicate recovered starting material.
b
Starting material was a 1:1 mixture of mono-fluoro isomers.
Scheme 1. Competition reactions to demonstrate selectivity.