J. Jayabharathi et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 97 (2012) 384–387
387
Table 1
Selected bond lengths (Å), bond angles (°) and torsional angles (°) of 5.
Bond lengths (Å)
Experimental XRD (Å)
Bond angles (°)
Experimental XRD (°)
Torsional angles (°)
Experimental XRD (°)
N1A–C2A
N1A–C8A
N1A–C1A
N3A–C2A
N3A–C9A
N1B–C2B
N1B–C8B
N1B–C1B
N3B–C2B
N3B–C9B
C1A–C11A
C2A–C21A
C7A–C8A
C8A–C9A
C14A–C17A
C24A–C27A
1.3782(1.4972)
1.3833(1.4584)
1.4537(1.4700)
1.3163(1.3671)
1.3881(1.4606)
1.3795(1.4972)
1.3863(1.4584)
1.4550(1.4700)
1.3174(1.3671)
1.3866(1.4606)
1.5135(1.5400)
1.4729(1.5400)
1.3921(1.3862)
1.3999(1.4763)
1.5089(1.5400)
1.5078(1.5400)
C2A–N1A–C8A
C2A–N1A–C1A
C8A–N1A–C1A
C2A–N3A–C9A
C2B–N1B–C8B
C2B–N1B–C1B
C8B–N1B–C1B
C2B–N3B–C9B
N1A–C1A–C11A
N3A–C2A–N1A
N3A–C2A–C21A
N1A–C2A–C21A
N1A–C8A–C3A
N1A–C8A–C9A
N3A–C9A–C4A
N3A–C9A–C8A
106.23(101.69)
128.33(113.71)
124.79(113.33)
104.77(105.49)
106.27(101.69)
129.32(113.71)
123.98(113.33)
105.12(105.41)
115.07(109.47)
113.25(113.53)
123.44(123.23)
123.30(123.24)
131.76(130.72)
103.49(108.25)
129.91(130.69)
110.26(108.25)
C2A–N1A–C1A–C11A
C8A–N1A–C1A–C11A
C9A–N3A–C2A–N1A
C9A–N3A–C2A–C21A
C8A–N1A–C2A–N3A
C1A–N1A–C2A–N3A
C8A–N1A–C2A–C21A
C1A–N1A–C2A–C21A
C9A–C4A–C5A–C6A
C2A–N1A–C8A–C7A
C1A–N1A–C8A–C7A
C2A–N1A–C8A–C9A
C1A–N1A–C8A–C9A
C6A–C7A–C8A–N1A
C2B–N1B–C1B–C11B
C8B–N1B–C1B–C11B
C9B–N3B–C2B–N1B
C9B–N3B–C2B–C21B
C8B–N1B–C2B–N3B
C1B–N1B–C2B–N3B
C8B–N1B–C2B–C21B
C1B–N1B–C2B–C21B
C9B–C4B–C5B–C6B
C2B–N1B–C8B–C7B
C1B–N1B–C8B–C7B
C2B–N1B–C8B–C9B
C1B–N1B–C8B–C9B
C6B–C7B–C8B–N1B
109.45(ꢀ177.75)
ꢀ81.12(ꢀ62.25)
ꢀ0.02(ꢀ13.69)
ꢀ178.71(165.91)
0.59(17.54)
171.55(139.72)
179.28(ꢀ162.06)
ꢀ9.75(ꢀ39.88)
0.1(ꢀ0.1581)
178.45(166.15)
7.08(43.71)
ꢀ0.88(13.70)
ꢀ172.25(136.15)
179.75(176.19)
108.10(ꢀ177.75)
ꢀ79.66(ꢀ62.25)
ꢀ0.86(ꢀ13.69)
177.35(165.91)
1.24(17.54)
173.85(139.72)
ꢀ176.90(162.06)
ꢀ4.29(ꢀ39.88)
0.25(ꢀ0.1581)
176.39(166.15)
3.28(43.71)
ꢀ1.05(ꢀ13.70)
ꢀ174.15(ꢀ136.15)
177.76(176.19)
Values within the parenthesis corresponds to theoretical values.
(Fig. S3) shows that the benzimidazole ring is essentially planar.
The dihedral angles between the planes of the benzimidazole and
the benzene rings of the 4-methylbenzyl and the p-tolyl groups
are 76.64(3)° and 46.87(4)°, respectively, in molecule A. The cor-
responding values in molecule B are 86.31(2)° and 39.14(4)°. The
dihedral angle between the planes of the two benzene rings is
73.73(3)° and 80.69(4)° in molecules A and B, respectively. Opti-
mization of 5 have been performed by DFT at B3LYP/6-31G(d,p)
using Gaussian-03. All these XRD data are in good agreement
with the theoretical values (Table 1). However, from the theoret-
ical values it can be found that most of the optimized bond
lengths, bond angles and dihedral angles are slightly higher than
that of XRD values. These deviations can be attributed to the fact
that the theoretical calculations were aimed at the isolated
molecule in the gaseous phase and the XRD results were aimed
at the molecule in the solid state.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References
[1] A. Wauquier, W.A.E. Van Den Broeck, J.L. Verheyen, P.A.J. Janssen, Eur. J.
Pharmacol. 47 (1978) 367–377.
[2] R.W. Brimblecombe, W.A.M. Duncan, G.J. Durant, J.C. Emmett, C.R. Ganellin,
M.E. Parons, J. Int. Med. Res. 3 (1975) 86–92.
[3] Y. Tanigawara, N. Aoyama, T. Kita, K. Shirakawa, F. Komada, M. Kasuga, K.
Okumura, Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 66 (1999) 528–534.
[4] J. Heers, L.J.J. Backx, J.H. Mostmans, J. Van Cutsem, J. Med. Chem. 22 (1979)
1003–1005.
[5] W. Hunkeler, H. Mohler, L. Pieri, P. Polc, E.P. Bonetti, R. Cumin, R. Schaffner, W.
Haefely, Nature 290 (1981) 514–516.
[6] P. Wasserscheid, W. Keim, Angew Chem. Int. Ed. Eng. 39 (2000) 37872–37877.
[7] I. Satoru, Japn Kokkai Tokyo Koho JP 01, 117, 867, May 10, 1989 Chem Abstr
111 (1989) 214482.
[8] M.R. Grimmett, A.R. Katritzky, C.W. Rees (Eds.), Comprehensive Heterocyclic
Chemistry, vol. 5, Pergamon, New York, 1984, pp. 457–497.
[9] M.R. Grimmett, A.R. Katritzky, C.W. Rees, E.F.V. Scriven (Eds.), Comprehensive
Heterocyclic Chemistry, vol. 3, Pergamon, NewYork, 1996, pp. 77–220.
[10] S. Balalaie, A. Arabanian, M.S. Hashtroudi, Monatsh. Chem. 131 (2000) 945–
948.
[11] W.S. Hung, J.T. Lin, C.H. Chien, Y.T. Tao, S.S. Sun, Y.S. Wen, Chem. Mater. 16
(2004) 2480–2488.
[12] C.H. Chen, J. Shi, Coord. Chem. Rev. 171 (1998) 161–174.
[13] B. Bodenant, T. Weil, M. Businelli-Pourcel, F. Fages, B. Barbe, I. Pianet, M.
Laguerre, J. Org. Chem. 64 (1999) 7034–7039.
[14] A. Torrado, G.K. Walkup, B. Imperiali, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120 (1998) 609–610.
[15] R. Krämer, Angew Chem. Int. Ed. 37 (1998) 772–773.
[16] J.H. Fox, J.A. Kama, G. Lieberman, R. Chopra, K. Dorsey, V. Chopra, I. Volitakis,
R.A. Cherny, A.I. Bush, S. Hersch, PLoS One 2 (2007) e334.
[17] I.G. Macreadie, Eur. Biophys. J. (2007).
Conclusions
We have developed a simple and sensitive fluorescent probe
for Cu2+ metal ion. Benzimidazole derivatives are bound with
Cu2+ metal ion through azomethine nitrogen. The decrease in
fluorescence intensity is attributed to electron transfer between
benzimidazole derivative and the Cu2+ metal ion. The Cu2+ metal
ion quenches the fluorescence intensity of benzimidazole deriva-
tives (1–6) more than ten times when compared to Fe3+, Mg2+
,
Ag+, K+ and Na+ metal ions.
[18] D.R. Richardson, Y. Suryo Rahmanto, Biochem. J. 402 (2007) e1–e3.
[19] B. Lin, Z. Fu, Y. Ji, Appl. Phy. Lett. 79 (1991) (1991) 943–945.
[20] L. Cyril, J.K. Earl, W.M. Sperry, Biochemists’ Handbook, E. & F. N. Spon, London,
1961. 84–88.
Acknowledgments
[21] G.Z. Chen, X.Z. Huang, J.G. Xu, Z.B. Wang, Z.Z. Zheng, Method of Fluorescent
Analysis, second ed., Science Press, Beijing, 1990. pp. 126 Chapter 4.
[22] W.Y. He, Y. Li, C. Xue, Z.D. Hu, X.G. Chen, F.L. Sheng, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 13
(2005) 1837–1845.
[23] S. Rosepriya, A. Thiruvalluvar, K. Jayamoorthy, J. Jayabharathi, Antony Linden,
Acta Cryst. E67 (2011) o3519.
One of the authors Prof. J. Jayabharathi is thankful to Depart-
ment of Science and Technology [No. SR/S1/IC-73/2010], University
Grants commission (F. No. 36-21/2008 (SR)) and Defence Research
and Development Organisation (DRDO) (NRB-213/MAT/10-11) for
providing funds to this research study.