Macromolecules, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2005
Communications to the Editor 219
nooxy-terminated PEO circumvents these shortcomings by
forming a chemically stable oxime bond with the ketone
without the use of a base.
(22) Representative synthetic procedures: 3 g of methoxy-PEO
(MW: 750, 4.0 mmol) was reacted with 1.14 g of p-
toluenesulfonyl chloride (tosyl chloride) (6.0 mmol) and 0.84
mL of triethylamine (6.0 mmol) in dichloromethane for 5 h
at 0 °C. The product was purified by filtration followed by
reprecipitation in diethyl ether. 1H NMR (400 MHz in
CDCl3), δ (ppm): 2.32 (s, 3H, Ar-CH3), 3.35 (s, 3H, CH3),
3.5-3.8 (m, 62H, CH2CH2O), 4.14 (t, 2H, CH2OSO2Ar), 7.12
(d, 2H, Ar), 7.76 (d, 2H, Ar). Tosylated PEO derivative (2.0
g, 2.2 mmol) was reacted with N-hydroxyphthalimide (0.54
g, 3.3 mmol) and triethylamine (0.46 mL, 3.3 mmol) in THF
at 65 °C for 24 h. The product was purified by the same
methods as described above. 1H NMR (400 MHz in CDCl3),
δ (ppm): 3.35 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.5-3.8 (m, 62H, CH2CH2O),
4.36 (t, 2H, CH2ON), 7.71 (d, 2H, Ar), 7.83 (d, 2H, Ar). The
obtained PEO derivative (2.0 g, 2.2 mmol) was then treated
with hydrazine (0.11 mL, 3.3 mmol) in dichloromethane at
25 °C for 8 h. The product was collected by reprecipitation
in diethyl ether. 1H NMR (400 MHz in CDCl3), δ (ppm): 3.35
(s, 3H, CH3), 3.5-3.8 (m, 62H, CH2CH2O), 3.82 (t, 2H, CH2-
ON). When the molecular weight of methoxy-PEO was less
than 750, its derivative was purified by column chromatog-
raphy. In the case of monoaminooxy-terminated hexaeth-
ylene glycol, PEO (MW: 282) was at first reacted with 3,4-
dihydro-2H-pyran, and monoprotected PEO was isolated by
column chromatography. The protecting group was removed
by adding pyridinium p-toluenesulfonate after tosylation of
the hydroxyl group (Scheme 2b).
(23) Lower molecular weight (<100 kg/mol) PCL derivatives were
prepared with aluminum isopropoxide.11-13 For higher
molecular weight PCL derivatives, typical synthetic proce-
dures were as follows. The ring-opening copolymerization
of ꢀ-CL (9.3 g, 81.6 mmol) and 1,4,8-trioxaspiro[4,6]-9-
undecanone (1.0 g, 5.8 mmol) was carried out with tin
octoate (40 mg, 100 µmol) at 110 °C in 5 mL of toluene for
24 h. After polymerization, an excess of 1 N HCl was added
to terminate polymerization, and the copolymer was col-
lected by reprecipitation in methanol. The Mw and Mw/Mn
of the resulting polymer were determined to be 233 kg/mol
and 1.9, respectively, by size exclusion chromatography.
Finally, PCL incorporating 6.6 mol % of ketone group was
obtained after deacetalization with triphenylcarbenium
tetrafluoroborate.
Figure 2. Effect of stoichiometry and temperature on ami-
nooxy-terminated PEO (MW: 750) coupling as a function of
time at 25 °C (open symbols) and 40 °C (filled symbols).
Stoichiometry: aminooxy group/ketone ) 1 (circles), 3 (squares),
and 25 (triangles).
References and Notes
(1) Chasin, M.; Langer, R. Biodegradable Polymers as Drug
Delivery Systems; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1990.
(2) Shalaby, S. W.; Burg, K. J. L. Absorbable and Biodegradable
Polymers; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 2004.
(3) Barrera, D. A.; Zylstra, E.; Lansbury, P. T.; Langer, R. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 11010.
(4) Barrera, D. A.; Zylstra, E.; Lansbury, P. T.; Langer, R.
Macromolecules 1995, 28, 425.
(5) Vert, M.; Lenz, R. W. Polym. Prepr. (Am. Chem. Soc., Div.
Polym. Chem.) 1979, 20, 608.
(6) Kimura, Y.; Shirotani, K.; Yamane, H.; Kitao, T. Macro-
molecules 1988, 21, 3338.
(7) Chiellini, E.; Solaro, R. Macrimol. Symp. 1992, 54/55, 483.
(8) Stassin, F.; Halleux, O.; Dubois, P.; Detrembleur, C.;
Lecomte, P.; Je´roˆme, R. Macromol. Symp. 2000, 153, 27.
(9) Parrish, B.; Emrick, T. Macromolecules 2004, 37, 5863.
(10) Ni, Q.; Yu, L. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 1645.
(11) Carrot, G.; Hilborn, J. G.; Trollsas, M.; Hedrick, J. L.
Macromolecules 1999, 32, 5264.
(12) Ouchi, T.; Fujino, A. Makromol. Chem. 1989, 190, 1523.
(13) Kimura, Y.; Shirotani, K.; Yamane, H.; Kitao, T. Polymer
1993, 34, 1741.
(14) Vert, M.; Lenz, R. W. ACS. Polym. Prepr. 1979, 20, 608.
(15) Cammas, M. S.; Guerin, P. Macromol. Symp. 2000, 153, 167.
(16) Bizzarri, R.; Chiellini, F.; Solaro, R.; Chiellini, E.; Cammas,
M. S.; Guerin, P. Macromolecules 2002, 35, 1215.
(17) Zhou, Q. X.; Kohn, J. Macromolecules 1990, 23, 3399.
(18) Tian, D.; Dubois, P.; Grandfils, C.; Je´roˆme, R. Macromol-
ecules 1997, 30, 406.
(19) Tian, D.; Dubois, P.; Je´roˆme, R. Macromolecules 1997, 30,
1947.
(20) Tian, D.; Dubois, P.; Je´roˆme, R. Macromolecules 1997, 30,
2575.
(24) Ikeda, I.; Horie, N.; Suzuki, K. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1994,
54, 1123.
(25) Cho, K. Y.; Kim, C. H.; Lee, J. W.; Park, J. K. Macromol.
Rapid Commun. 1999, 20, 598.
(26) Ponsart, S.; Coudane, J.; McGrath, J.; Vert, M. J. Bioact.
Compat. Polym. 2002, 17, 417.
(27) Mayes, A. M.; Irvine, D. J.; Griffith, L. G. Mater. Res. Soc.
Symp. 1998, 530, 73.
(28) Irvine, D. J.; Mayes, A. M.; Griffith, L. G. Biomacromolecules
2001, 2, 85.
(21) Aminooxy-terminated PEO is preferred over commercially
available amine terminated PEO. While the coupling of
amine to ketone is known, the imine product is highly
unstable and susceptible to hydrolysis. Furthermore, the
reaction requires the use of base as a catalyst, which can
lead to degradation of the polyester backbone. Using ami-
(29) Irvine, D. J.; Ruzette, A. V. G.; Mayes, A. M.; Griffith, L. G.
Biomacromolecules 2001, 2, 545.
(30) Koo, L. Y.; Irvine, D. J.; Mayes, A. M.; Lauffenburger, D.
A.; Griffith, L. G. J. Cell Sci. 2002, 115, 1423.
MA0487554