N. Savitha Devi, S. Perumal / Tetrahedron Letters 48 (2007) 5627–5629
5629
7. Leflemme, N.; Dallemagne, P.; Rault, S. Synthesis 2002,
1740.
8. Hattori, K.; Yamamoto, H. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 3264.
9. Dong, D.; Bi, X.; Liu, Q.; Cong, F. Chem. Commun. 2005,
3580.
7.38 (m, 10H, 2Ph), 5.52 (s, 1H, H-5), 5.24 (br s, 1H,
NH), 4.92 (dd, J = 14.7, 4.5 Hz, 1H, H-2), 2.90–2.70
(m, 1H, H-3ax), 2.62 (dd, J = 16.2, 4.5 Hz, 1H, H-
3eq)] corresponds with the structure of 3a. The melting
point of 3a from our work (240 ꢁC) and that from
Krishna Pillay’s10 study (118 ꢁC) also differ greatly.
From the above, it is clear that the products from these
two studies are quite different, although the correct
structure of the compound reported previously as 3a
could not be deduced from the available data.10
10. Krishna Pillay, M.; Fazal Mohamed, M. I. J. Indian
Chem. Soc. 1993, 70, 257.
11. (a) Ho, T.-L. Tandem Organic Reactions; Wiley: New
York, 1992; (b) Tietze, L. F.; Brasche, C.; Gericke, K. M.
Domino Reactions in Organic Synthesis; Wiley-VCH, 2006;
(c) Tietze, L. F. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 115; (d) Bunce, R. A.
Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 13103.
12. Anastas, P. T.; Williamson, T. C. Green Chemistry:
Frontiers in Benign Chemical Synthesis and Processes;
Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1998, p 166.
13. Anastas, P. T.; Warner, J. C. Green Chemistry Theory
and Practice; Oxford University Press: New York, NY,
1998.
In summary, a facile one-pot synthesis of novel 2,6-di-
aryl-2,3-dihydro-1H-pyridin-4-ones has been accom-
plished for the first time employing a tandem protocol
involving
a double Mannich reaction–elimination
sequence under mild reaction conditions.
14. (a) Alex Raja, V. P.; Perumal, S. Tetrahedron 2006, 62,
4892; (b) Savitha Devi, N.; Perumal, S. Tetrahedron 2006,
62, 5931; (c) Srinivasan, M.; Perumal, S. Tetrahedron
2006, 62, 7726; (d) Indumathi, S.; Ranjith Kumar, R.;
Perumal, S. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 1411; (e) Srinivasan,
M.; Perumal, S. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 2865; (f) Kamal
Nasar, M.; Ranjith Kumar, R.; Perumal, S. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2007, 48, 2155; (g) Karthikeyan, S. V.; Perumal, S.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 2261.
Acknowledgements
S.P. thanks the Council of Scientific and Industrial
Research, New Delhi, for a Major Research Project
[No. 01(1926/04/EMR II)], the University Grants
Commission, New Delhi, for funds under the DRS
and ASIST programmes and the Department of
Science and Technology for funds under the IRHPA
programme for the purchase of a high resolution
300 MHz NMR spectrometer.
15. Representative experimental procedure: A mixture of 1-(4-
chlorophenylsulfinyl)propan-2-one 1 (2.3 mmol), 4-chloro-
benzaldehyde 2b (4.6 mmol) and ammonium acetate
(2.3 mmol) in ethanol (10 mL) was gently heated to
boiling and allowed to cool to room temperature and
the reaction mixture set aside for 3–5 days to ensure
completion of the reaction (TLC). The reaction mixture
was extracted with chloroform (25 mL), the organic layer
washed with water (3 · 25 mL), dried over anhydrous
Na2SO4 and concentrated under reduced pressure. The
residue was chromatographed over silica gel (230–400
mesh) using petroleum ether/ethyl acetate (4:1 v/v) to
afford 2,6-bis(4-chlorophenyl)-2,3-dihydro-1H-pyridin-4-
one 3b (Table 1, entry 2): pale yellow solid; mmax (KBr):
References and notes
1. Chen, C.; McDonald, I. A.; Munoz, B. Tetrahedron Lett.
1998, 39, 217.
2. Holladay, M. W.; Dart, M. J.; Lynch, J. K. J. Med. Chem.
1997, 40, 4169.
3. (a) Mederski, W. W. K. R.; Dorsch, D.; Bokel, H.-H.;
Beier, N.; Lues, I.; Schelling, P. J. Med. Chem. 1994, 37,
1632; (b) Mederski, W. W. K. R.; Dorsch, D.; Osswald,
M.; Schwartz, H.; Beier, N.; Christadler, M.; Minck, K.
O.; Schelling, P.; Schmitges, C. J. Eur. J. Med. Chem.
1997, 32, 479; (c) Leflemme, N.; Freret, T.; Boulouard, M.;
Dallemagne, P.; Rault, S. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem.
2005, 20, 551; (d) Aytemir, M. D.; Hider, R. C.; Erol, D.
D.; Ozalp, M.; Ekizoglu, M. Turk. J. Chem. 2003, 27, 445.
4. Dolle, R. E.; Nicolaou, K. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107,
1691.
3457, 1635 cmꢀ1
.
Mp = 223 ꢁC; 1H NMR (CDCl3,
300 MHz): dH 7.51–7.33 (m, 8H), 5.47 (s, 1H), 5.09 (s,
1H), 4.87 (dd, J = 14.3, 4.7 Hz, 1H), 2.74 (dd, J = 16.2,
14.3 Hz, 1H), 2.59 (dd, J = 16.2, 4.7 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR
(CDCl3, 75 MHz): dC 192.0, 160.2, 138.4, 137.2, 134.5,
133.7, 129.4, 129.3, 128.1, 127.4, 99.7, 58.0, 43.6. Anal.
Calcd for C17H13Cl2NO: C, 64.17; H, 4.12; N, 4.40.
Found: C, 64.14; H, 4.14; N, 4.37%.
16. Crumbie, R. L.; Deol, B. S.; Nemorin, J. E.; Ridley, D. D.
Aust. J. Chem. 1978, 31, 1965.
17. (a) Noller, C. R.; Baliah, V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1948, 70,
3853; (b) Srinivasan, M.; Perumal, S.; Selvaraj, S. Arkivoc
2005, 201.
5. Renault, O.; Guillon, J.; Dallemagne, P.; Rault, S.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 681.
6. Leflemme, N.; Dallemagne, P.; Rault, S. Tetrahedron
2004, 60, 4861.