concentration of DNA tested (50 µg mL21), the fluorescence
emission reached up to 13.3 times higher than that of the free
compound (Fig. 3). A blue shift of 17 nm in the emission
wavelength upon DNA addition was observed, without a
significant excitation wavelength shift. The structure of com-
pound 1 includes a 2,4,5-trimethoxy group from the benzalde-
hyde moiety and a unique adamantyl pyridinium function-
ality.
Different trimethoxy isomers, 2 (3,4,5-trimethoxy) and 3
(2,3,4-trimethoxy), were synthesized to compare the positional
effects of the methoxy groups in compound 1 (Fig. 1). While the
responses of compounds 2 and 3 to DNA treatment were similar
to that of compound 1, the fluorescence emission increase was
much smaller in 2 (4.3 fold) and 3 (1.5 fold). It is noteworthy
that the intrinsic fluorescence intensities of compounds 2 and 3
are higher than that of compound 1, but DNA treated samples
showed comparable quantum yields (Table 1). Compound 4
was also resynthesized and tested to study the structural
importance of the adamantyl group in compound 1.
Fig. 4 Nuclear staining of compounds 1, 2, and 3 (500 µM).
Interestingly, the simple exchange of the adamantyl with a
methyl group significantly reduced the DNA response in
compound 4. Therefore, both 2,4,5-trimethoxy groups and the
adamantyl group are important in the specific interaction of
compound 1 and DNA.
The three related compounds 1, 2, and 3 were incubated in
live UACC-62 human melanoma cells to compare their nuclear
localization properties (Fig. 4). In comparison to compound 1 in
the same concentration, compounds 2 and 3 showed stronger
fluorescence backgrounds and spread throughout the cyto-
plasm. However, compound 1 clearly stains the nucleus of live
cells more selectively.
In summary, a combined combinatorial synthesis of styryl
dyes and cell-based screening provided a novel structural motif
for a DNA sensor, compound 1. Compound 1 is one of the rare
cell permeable nuclear staining dyes and would be useful for
live cell imaging purposes. The general strategy developed in
this study will be applied to novel organelle specific sensor
development.
Notes and references
1 R. P. Haugland, Nucleic acid detection and genomics technology in
Handbook of Fluorescent Probes and Research Products, 9th edn.,
Molecular Probes, USA, 2002, pp. 265–352.
2 P. Selvin, Science, 1992, 257, 885–886.
3 (a) J.-B. LePecq and C. Paoletti, J. Mol. Biol., 1967, 27, 87–106; (b) J. J.
Lawrence and M. Louis, FEBS Lett., 1974, 40, 9–12; (c) D. J. Roser, Soil
Biol. Biochem., 1980, 12, 329–336.
4 (a) P. Lebaron, P. Catala and N. Parthuisot, Appl. Environ. Microbiol.,
1998, 64, 2697–2700; (b) L. J. Jones and V. L. Singer, Anal. Biochem.,
2001, 293, 8–15; (c) J. J. Gaforio, J. M. Serrano, E. Ortega, I. Algarra and
G. Alvarez de Cienfuegos, Cytometry, 2002, 48, 93–96.
5 (a) C. Labarca and K. Paigen, Anal. Biochem., 1980, 102, 344–352; (b)
T. Hard, P. Fan and D. R. Kearns, Photochem. Photobiol., 1990, 51,
77–86; (c) K. Wiederholt, S. B. Rajur, J. Giuliano, Jr., M. J. O’Donnell
and L. W. McLaughlin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 7055–7062; (d) C.
Behrens, N. Harrit and P. E. Nielsen, Bioconjugate Chem., 2001, 12,
1021–1027.
6 F. Otto and K. C. Tsou, Stain Technol., 1985, 60, 7–11.
7 L. Shapira, S. Takashipa, J. R. Kalmar, T. E. Van Dyke, V. Barak and W.
A. Soskolne, J. Immunol. Methods, 1993, 165, 93–98.
8 G. R. Rosania, J. W. Lee, L. Ding, H. S. Yoon and Y. T. Chang, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 1130–1131.
Fig. 3 Absorption and fluorescence spectra of compounds 1–3. Dye 1, 2, 3
(50 µM), dsDNA (50 µg mL21).
9 M. Matusui, S. Kawamura, K. Shibata and H. Muramatsu, Bull. Chem.
Soc. Jpn., 1992, 65, 71–74.
CHEM. COMMUN., 2003, 1852–1853
1853