Organic Letters
Letter
3va regioselectively albeit in very low yield (10%), and 2-
styrylpyridine gave 3wa in low yield and selectivity, with a
slight preference for the β-addition product (28%, 1:1.6).
Finally, an α,β-unsaturated ester bearing only an aliphatic
substituent reacted to give exclusively the β-addition product
3xa′. More electron-poor substrates such as ketones (e.g.,
3ya′), although generally compatible with the reaction, tended
to give β-addition as the major product.
Scheme 3. Hydroaminomethylation of Styrene Derivatives
(4) with N,N-Dimethylaniline (2a)
a
Scheme 2. Hydroaminomethylation of Methyl Cinnamate
(1a) with Amines (2) (Reaction Conditions Same as in
Scheme 1; [Ir]+ = [Ir(ppy)2(dtbbpy)]PF6)
a
Reactions carried out with 4 (0.2 mmol), 2a (2 equiv),
[Ir(ppy)2(dtbbpy)]PF6 (1 mol %), and Cs2CO3 (20 mol %) in
MeCN (8 mL), under blue light irradiation for 24 h while controlling
the temperature at 25 °C. Yields are of isolated product. [Ir]+
=
b
[Ir(ppy)2(dtbbpy)]PF6. Yield determined by 1H NMR using an
internal standard.
anti-Markovnikov regioselectivity.27 Similarly, 1,1-diphenyle-
thene provided product 5j in 77% yield. β-Methylstyrene
reacted with the same selectivity but providing a very poor
yield of 5k. It is worth noting that, while these examples show
that an electron-withdrawing group directly bound to the
alkene was not necessary, high electron density was still
detrimental to the reaction: Thus, p-aminostyrene did not react
and p-methoxystyrene provided only low yields of the product
(5l, 5m). A m-methoxy substituent, having an overall electron-
withdrawing effect (Hammet σm = +0.115 vs. σp = −0.268),
provided 5n in 70% yield.
The simple conditions employed allowed for the straightfor-
ward translation into a readily scalable continuous flow
method. Thus, a MeCN solution of alkene, amine, and catalyst
containing 20 mol % of DBU was pumped through a coil of
PTFE tube which was irradiated with blue LEDs. The collected
solution, after workup and purification, afforded the corre-
sponding β-amino ester product. This method was applied,
with excellent results, to the preparation of compounds 3aa,
3ae, and 3ag (Scheme 4).
A plausible mechanism for the reaction (Figure 2) would
involve reductive quenching of the excited catalyst (E° Ir/*Ir+
= 0.76 V) by amine 2 (E° 2+/2 = 0.71 V) followed by
deprotonation to form and aminoalkyl radical B,28,29 which
would then add across the alkene substrate (1 or 4) double
bond. Reduction of the resulting benzylic radical Cα followed
by protonation would lead to product 3 or 5. Control
experiments supported the formation of the α-aminoalkyl
radical under our reaction conditions, promoted by the
presence of Cs2CO3 (Figure S3, SI). Also, deuteration at the
benzylic position was observed when the reaction was
performed in the presence of D2O (Figure S4).
a
b
0.2 mmol of 2 and 3 equiv of 1a were used. Product was obtained
c
as a mixture of diastereoisomers (see SI). Product was obtained as a
7:1 mixture of regioisomers. Characterized as mixture of α/β.
d
Then, we explored the reactivity of different amines
(Scheme 2). The reaction proceeds well with a variety of
substituted dimethylaniline derivatives (3ab to 3ae) as well as
with methyldiphenylamine (3af). N-Phenylpyrrolidine and
N,N-diethylaniline provided products 3ag and 3ah in excellent
yields and regioselectivities, although with poor diastereose-
lectivity. Similar to the above-mentioned observations for
products 3ra and 3sa, an alkene-substituted diphenylamine
derivative resulted in formation of product 3ai with no
cyclization of the pendant terminal alkene. Nonsymmetrically
substituted anilines tended to react at the position leading to
the least stable radical. Thus, N-ethyl-N-methylaniline gave 3aj
as the major product, while N-methyl-N-isopropylaniline and
N-methyl-N-benzylaniline gave 3ak and 3al, with no reaction
observed at the isopropyl and benzyl substituents, respectively.
Remarkably, the reaction was not limited to aniline derivatives:
products 3am and 3an were readily obtained from their parent
amines in good yields and selectivities. This opens the way for
the application of the present reaction to more diverse and
useful products; however, further optimization is still needed
to extend the scope to diverse aliphatic amines.26
Finally, we explored the reactivity under our conditions of
styrene derivatives, not bearing the electron-withdrawing group
on the alkene (Scheme 3). Both styrene and a range of
substituted derivatives reacted smoothly with N,N-dimethyla-
niline to give the corresponding hydroaminomethylation
products 5a−i in good yields (54 to 81%) and with complete
5385
Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 5383−5388