Table 1. 2-Substituted-3-p-toluenesulfonyldihydrofuran
Products 7 Prepared from Alkynyliodonium Salts 4 in THF at
Reflux
pass through a formal Stevens 1,2-shift of R within the ylide
6 to fashion the new C-C bond in 7. Variable but significant
quantities of the proton-trapping product 8 are formed as
well, and formation of this compound constitutes the major
yield-limiting competition in the sequence. The choice of
sulfinate as a nucleophile was predicated on a desire to
prepare an enol ether product 3 whose alkene would not be
sensitive to hydrolysis upon isolation/chromatography. In
principle, the range of nucleophiles with reported utility in
converting an alkynyliodonium salt into the derived carbene
(sulfonamide anion, azide, â-dicarbonyl enolate, etc.)1 may
be applicable to this transformation as well.
A series of alkynyliodonium salts 4a-4g was prepared
and examined in this dihydrofuran-forming reaction, Table
1. These salts were readily available by treatment of the
corresponding alkynyltributylstannanes with Stang’s reagent,
PhI(CN)OTf. The thermal lability of these species required
that temperatures did not exceed -30 °C during their
preparation and handling. Optimization studies with sub-
strates 4a and 4d spanned a range of experimental variables,
including order and rate of addition, concentration (0.15-
0.30 M in iodonium salt), temperature (room temperature
f refluxing solvent), and solvents (CH2Cl2, ClCH2CH2Cl,
THF, DME, t-BuOMe, DMF), to maximize production of
the dihydrofuran products 7a and 7d, respectively. Eventu-
ally, a procedure by which a chilled (-42 °C) THF solution
of the alkynyliodonium salt 4d was rapidly cannulated into
refluxing THF containing a suspension of 1.3 equiv of
anhydrous sodium p-toluenesulfinate (final concentration
∼ 0.15 M alkynyliodonium salt) was found to provide the
desired cyclized/rearranged dihydrofuran product 7d in
optimal yield. Further experimental details can be found in
the Supporting Information.
Verification of Kim’s observations that silicon migrates
effectively (entry a) while benzyl does not (entry b) provided
a baseline for subsequent studies. Better carbon migration
results are obtained with the tetrahydrofuran and tetra-
hydropyran series, entries c-f. With both the simple unsub-
stituted rings (entries c and d, respectively), the desired
2-tetrahydrofuranyl- and 2-tetrahydropyranyldihydrofurans
are formed in moderate yields. The formal Stevens rear-
rangement appears to proceed with reasonable levels of
stereochemical fidelity in the tetrahydropyran series, entries
e and f. Each pure diastereomer of the 3-methyl-substituted
substrates 4e and 4f provides a diastereomeric mixture of
2-dihydrofuranyltetrahydropyran products that strongly favors
retention of the stereochemical relationship present in the
starting material. The ratios of diastereomers were determined
by integration of diagnostic signals in the 1H NMR spectra.
The stereochemical assignments were predicated upon
analysis of the coupling constants between protons on the
stereogenic centers (7e, J1,2 ) 3.6 Hz; 7f, J1,2 ) 10.0 Hz).
Treatment of orthoester-containing substrate 4g with p-
toluenesulfinate provided acetal 7g in superior yield, and
none of the protonated dihydrofuran 8 was detected. This
observation draws attention to the possible role that the C(3)
THP proton (H in 4d) plays in the formation of the
dihydrofuran byproduct 8.
The mechanistic course of this transformation is believed
to proceed through the oxonium ylide 6 en route to
dihydrofuran product 7. Evidence that has been interpreted
as supporting either homolytic or heterolytic scission of the
C-O bond within trivalent oxonium ylides has been
recorded,6 but no mechanistic investigations that factor in
(6) (a) Roskamp, E. J.; Johnson, C. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108,
6062. (b) Eberlein, J. H.; West, F. G.; Tester, R. W. J. Org. Chem. 1992,
57, 3479. (c) Doyle, M. P.; Griffin, J. H.; Chinn, M. S.; van Leusen, D. J.
Org. Chem. 1984, 49, 1917.
2604
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 17, 2000