containing 1 atm oxygen. After shaking, variation of the UV–
VIS spectrum was recorded every 3 min up to 72 min, during
which isosbestic points were observed at 350 and 316 nm. From
stable conformer was obtained with a single point ROHF calcu-
lation using the UHF-optimized geometry. As for neutral spe-
cies 3 and 7a, both (E)- and (Z )-isomers were optimized with
C or C symmetry.
the plot of the logarithm of the absorbance at 440 nm vs. time,
2
i
ϩ
the rate constant was obtained. The reaction rate of 1 with O2
was determined by similar procedures. In the sample prepar-
2
ϩ
Acknowledgements
ation, the reduction was stopped when ca. 90% of 1 was con-
ϩ
verted to 1 to avoid concomitance of 1. The absorbance at
We wish to thank Professor Yuichi Masuda and Ms Haruko
2
5
00 nm was monitored for 6 h.
Hosoi, Ochanomizu University, for their help with H NMR
measurements and valuable discussions. We are grateful to Pro-
fessor Mamoru Ohashi and Dr Takashi Hirano, The University
of Electro-Communications, for measuring CL spectra. Thanks
are also due to Professor Hajime Nagano, Ochanomizu Univer-
sity, for his discussion and encouragement and to Professor
Yutaka Fukuda for his kindness in putting his electrochemical
workstation at our disposal. This work was supported by a
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Edu-
cation, Science and Culture, Japan (No. 08554026).
EPR spectra of radical cations
A sample solution of a radical cation in MeCN (2 × 10 –
Ϫ4
Ϫ3
Ϫ3
1
× 10 mol dm ) was prepared by Na/Hg reduction of the
corresponding dication under vacuum in sealed glassware
equipped with an EPR tube. The variation of the UV–VIS spec-
trum was monitored, and when ca. 90% of the dication was
reduced, the solution was transferred to the EPR tube, which
was then mounted in an EPR cavity. The signal output for a
recorder was fed to an A/D converter, and the spectrum was
accumulated 8–32 times using a personal computer.
References
2
ϩ
NMR line broadening experiments for 1
1 S. F. Mason and D. R. Roberts, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.,
1967, 476.
2 R. A. Henry and C. A. Heller, J. Luminescence, 1971, 4, 105.
2
ϩ
Ϫ
3
A solution of 1 (Br ) (ca. 1 mg) in D O (0.9 cm ) was placed
2
2
2
ϩ
Ϫ
in glassware equipped with an NMR tube in which 1 (Br )
2
3
C. A. Heller, R. A. Henry and J. M. Fritsch, in Chemiluminescence
and Bioluminescence, ed. M. J. Cormier, D. M. Hercules and J. Lee,
Plenum Press, New York, 1973, p. 249.
(22 mg) was placed and a branch containing zinc powder. After
the solution was degassed by freeze–pump–thaw cycles, a por-
tion of the solution was transferred to the branch to obtain a
4 K. Maeda, Y. Matsuyama, K. Isozaki, S. Yamada and Y. Mori, J.
Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1996, 121.
ϩ
small amount of 1 , and then the whole solution was trans-
5
6
7
Y. Mori, Y. Matsuyama, S. Yamada and K. Maeda, Acta
Crystallogr., Sect. C, 1992, 48, 894.
Y. Mori, Y. Matsuyama, J. Suzuki, Y. Ishii, S. Yamada and K.
Maeda, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. C, 1993, 49, 1398.
ferred to the NMR tube. The tube was sealed off, the solid
2
2
ϩ
Ϫ
1
1
2
(Br ) was completely dissolved (The final concentration of
2
ϩ
Ϫ3
was ca. 0.055 mol dm ) and NMR spectra were recorded at
2
2–65 ЊC. As for H NMR measurements, the sample solution
was prepared by the same procedures using [ H ]1 (Br ) and
H O instead of 1 (Br ) and D O, respectively. The experi-
K. Yamaguchi, Y. Ikeda and T. Fueno, Tetrahedron, 1985, 41, 2099.
2
2ϩ
Ϫ
4
2
8 Z. Shi, V. Goulle and R. P. Thummel, Tetrahedron Lett., 1996, 37,
2357.
2
ϩ
Ϫ
2
2
2
9
D. T. Breslin and M. A. Fox, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115, 11716.
mental spectra were fitted to the sum of two Lorentzian curves
to obtain their linewidths. The frequency difference and line-
widths without exchange were determined from the spectrum
of a sample containing no radical. The linewidth of a signal
due to natural abundance of HDO in the solvent showed no
1
1
1
1
0 W. Adam and W. J. Baader, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1985, 107, 410.
1 G. B. Schuster, Acc. Chem. Res., 1979, 12, 366.
2 L. H. Catalani and T. Wilson, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1989, 111, 2633.
3 For examples, W. Adam, R. Fell and M. H. Schulz, Tetrahedron,
1993, 49, 2227; F. McCapra, Tetrahedron Lett., 1993, 34, 6941.
1
difference between samples with and without radical. The H
14 R. S. Nicholson and I. Shain, Anal. Chem., 1964, 36, 706.
1
5 M. Tsushima, K. Tokuda and T. Ohsaka, Anal. Chem., 1994, 66,
551.
NMR signals were assigned based on NOESY experiments
4
(
270 MHz, 50 ЊC) for a sample without a radical. Cross peaks
were observed between the pseudo-equatorial methylene pro-
tons and 3,3Ј-H as well as between 4,4Ј-H and 5,5Ј-H. δ (D O,
1
1
6 G. Eberlein and T. C. Bruice, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1983, 105, 6685.
7 D. T. Sawyer and E. J. Nanni, in Oxygen and oxy-radicals in
chemistry and biology, ed. M. A. Rodgers and E. L. Powers,
Academic Press, New York, 1982, pp. 15–44.
H
2
2
7
8
8
4 ЊC, 400 MHz) 5.35 (2H, m, CH ax), 5.54 (2H, m, CH eq),
2
2
.87 (2H, d, J 8.2, 5,5Ј-H), 7.92 (2H, dd, J 8.2 and 7, 6,6Ј-H),
.33 (2H, dd, J 8.2 and 7, 7,7Ј-H), 8.51 (2H, d, J 8.2, 8,8Ј-H),
.92 (2H, d, J 6.5, 4,4Ј-H) and 9.11 (2H, d, J 6.5, 3,3Ј-H).
18 E. J. Nanni, Jr., C. T. Angelis, J. Dickson and D. T. Sawyer, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1981, 103, 4268.
1
9 Y. Yoshioka, S. Yamanaka, S. Yamada, T. Kawakami, M. Nishino,
K. Yamaguchi and A. Nishinaga, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1996, 69,
2
701.
1
2؉
2؉
H NMR line broadening experiments for 3 and 7a2
2
0 N. J. Turro, Tetrahedron Lett., 1985, 41, 2089.
21 C. A. Heller, Adv. Chem. Ser., 1968, p. 225.
22 J. J. P. Stewart, J. Comput. Chem., 1989, 10, 209.
23 J. E. Dickeson and L. A. Summers, J. Heterocycl. Chem., 1970, 7,
ϩ
Ϫ
In a Pyrex NMR tube, NaBPh (7 mg) and 3 (PF )2 or
7
CD CN (0.8 cm ) was vacuum-transferred to the tube, which
was then sealed off from the vacuum line. The concentration of
the dication was ca. 0.06 mol dm . The sample solution was
irradiated with a 500 W xenon lamp for 20 s to obtain a small
amount of radical cation via photoinduced electron-transfer
from tetraphenylborate anion. The H NMR spectrum was
4
6
2
ϩ
Ϫ
a
(PF6 )2 were placed and degassed on a vacuum line.
3
3
4
01.
2
2
2
4 A. L. Rieger and P. H. Rieger, J. Phys. Chem., 1984, 88, 5845.
5 C. S. Johnson, Jr., Adv. Magn. Reson., 1965, 1, 33.
6 F. C. Adam, Can. J. Chem., 1971, 49, 3524.
Ϫ3
27 P. D. Sullivan and M. L. Williams, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1976, 98,
1
1711.
2
2
3
8 M. Tiecco, L. Testaferri, M. Tingoli, D. Chianelli and M.
Montanucci, Synthesis, 1984, 736.
9 P. Desos, G. Schlewer and C. G. Wermuth, Heterocycles, 1989, 28,
recorded at room temp.
MO calculations
PM3 calculations were carried out with the program of
MOPAC version 6.01. As for 1 the structure of 1 deter-
mined by X-ray analysis was used as the initial model and
structure optimization was performed by ROHF methods with
C symmetry. In the cases of 3 and 7a , UHF structure
optimization was carried out with C symmetry from several
initial structures with various torsion angles of N᎐C᎐C᎐N to
1
085.
0 H. Balli and D. Schelz, Helv. Chim. Acta, 1970, 53, 1903.
31 C. E. Kaslow and D. J. Cook, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1945, 67, 1969.
32 J. Lee and H. H. Seliger, Photochem. Photobiol., 1965, 4, 1015.
3 J. J. P. Stewart, MOPAC Ver. 6.0, QCPE No. 455; Revised as Ver.
6.01 by T. Hirano, Ochanomizu University.
3
3
ϩ
2ϩ
5
3
ϩ
ϩ
2
Paper 7/02289A
Received 3rd April 1997
Accepted 19th June 1997
2
give two local minima. The unpaired spin density of the more
1
976
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1997