therefore a greater rate of release, could be achieved by
linking the catalyst and ester to the bases via short tethers
and that 5-thiomethyluracil would be an ideal choice for
coupling to a maleimido ester. Herein we describe an eight-
step synthesis of a 5-thiomethyluracil PNA building block
6 (Scheme 1) for Fmoc synthesis from commercially
modification of nucleic acids and analogues with sensitive
functional groups, such as aryl esters, is best accomplished
following automated synthesis and deprotection, with chemose-
lective reactions that can proceed under near neutral condi-
tions at ambient temperature. Thiol groups have been
particularly useful in this regard and have been used to link
oligonucleotides to such molecules as biotin and fluorescent
probes7 as well as to peptides, proteins, and gold particles.8
Scheme 1. Synthesis of the PNA Building Block
C5-(Thioalkyl)uridines are particularly useful for both
internal and terminal modifications of DNA. Substituents at
the C5 position of pyrimidine nucleosides do not interfere
with Watson-Crick base pairing, and project out into the
major groove of duplex DNA thus allowing for more precise
conformational control compared to substituents linked to
the ends of DNA. Another advantage of linking to the bases
is that a modification can be introduced anywhere in a
sequence since the number and position of thiol-bearing
building blocks can be controlled by oligonucleotide syn-
thesis. While the synthesis of a series of 5-(thioalkyl)uridines
and 5-(thioalkyl)-2′-deoxyuridines has been described,9 the
preparation of 5-(thioalkyl)uracil PNA building blocks has
not yet been reported. A p-methoxybenzyl-protected 5-thio-
propynyl PNA monomer has been reported, but its incor-
poration into PNA has not.10 To reduce the conformational
degrees of freedom of the probe and catalyst in the nucleic
acid triggered probe activating system, we decided to
synthesize the 5-thiomethyluracil PNA building block 6
(Scheme 1).
Thiomethyluracil 1 was obtained in three steps from
hydroxymethyluracil according to a known procedure.11
Treatment of 1 with di-tert-butyl-1-(tert-butylthio)-1,2-
hydrazine dicarboxylate12 in DMF at room temperature for
12 h gave 5-(tert-butyldithio)methyluracil 2 in 91% yield
and in 51% overall yield from 5-hydroxymethyluracil.
Compound 2 has also been synthesized in 58% overall yield
in three steps from 5′-hydroxymethyluracil via the in situ
preparation of 5-thiomethyluracil.9b Compound 2 was alky-
lated with ethyl bromoacetate in the presence of potassium
carbonate in DMF to give ester 3 in 93% yield. Ester 3 was
hydrolyzed with 4% NaOH in methanol followed by
acidification to give acid 4 in 98% yield. EDC-mediated
available 5-hydroxymethyluracil and show how it can be used
to synthesize both the catalytic and probe components of a
DNA-triggered probe-releasing system. We also show that
this C5-linked system is more efficient in releasing hydroxy
coumarin than our previous system.
We previously chose peptide nucleic acid (PNA) to
recognize the triggering mRNA sequence because of a
number of features that make it ideal for in vivo use. PNA
is a oligonucleotide analogue in which the nucleobases are
linked to an N-(2-aminoethyl)glycine backbone instead of a
sugar-phosphate backbone.3 PNA has higher affinity for
complementary RNA sequences than natural ODNs and can
invade duplex regions, presumably because of its lack of
charge.4 PNA also has much higher biological stability than
ODNs in serum and in cells.5 For these reasons, PNA has
shown great promise for the design of nucleic acid-targeted
therapeutic agents, probes, and tools, either by itself or when
modified by other molecules, some of which are chemically
sensitive.3,6
(6) (a) Hyrup, B.; Nielsen, P. E. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1996, 4, 5-23.
(b) Nielsen, P. E. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1999, 9, 353-357. (c) Pooga,
M.; Land, T.; Bartfai, T.; Langel, U. Biomol. Eng. 2001, 17, 183-192. (d)
de Koning, M. C.; van der Marel, G. A.; Overhand, M. Curr. Opin. Chem.
Biol. 2003, 7, 734-740. (e) Nielsen, P. E. Mol. Biotechnol. 2004, 26, 233-
248.
(7) (a) Connolly, B. A.; Rider, P. Nucleic Acids Res. 1985, 13, 4485-
502. (b) Beaucage, S. L.; Iyer, R. P. Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 1925-1963.
(8) (a) Eritja, R.; Pons, A.; Escarceller, M.; Giralt, E.; Albericio, F.
Tetrahedron 1991, 47, 4113-4120. (b) Zuckermann, R. N.; Schultz, P. G.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 6592-6594. (c) Mirkin, C. A.; Letsinger, R.
L.; Mucic, R. C.; Storhoff, J. J. Nature 1996, 382, 607-609.
(9) (a) Goodwin, J. T.; Glick, G. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 5549-
5552. (b) Sun, S.; Tang, X.-Q.; Merchant, A.; Anjaneyulu, P. S. R.; Piccirilli,
J. A. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 5708-5709.
Because of the basic and/or acidic conditions used in
various steps in solid-phase synthesis and final deprotection,
(3) Nielsen, P. E.; Egholm, M.; Berg, R. H.; Buchardt, O. Science 1991,
254, 1497-1500.
(4) (a) Egholm, M.; Buchardt, O.; Christensen, L.; Behrens, C.; Freier,
S. M.; Driver, D. A.; Berg, R. H.; Kim, S. K.; Norden, B.; Nielsen, P. E.
Nature 1993, 365, 566-568. (b) Peffer, N. J.; Hanvey, J. C.; Bisi, J. E.;
Thomson, S. A.; Hassman, C. F.; Noble, S. A.; Babiss, L. E. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1993, 90, 10648-10652.
(10) Hudson, R. H. E.; Li, G.; Tse, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 1381-
1386.
(11) Giner-Sorolla, A.; Medrek, L. J. Med. Chem. 1966, 9, 97-101.
(12) Wunsch, E.; Moroder, L.; Romani, S. Hoppe-Seyler’s Z. Physiol.
Chem. 1982, 363, 1461-1464.
(5) Uhlmann, E.; Peyman, A. Chem. ReV. 1990, 90, 543-584.
752
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 5, 2005