Published on Web 05/11/2009
Molecular Recognition on a Cavitand-Functionalized Silicon
Surface
†
‡
‡
‡
Elisa Biavardi, Maria Favazza, Alessandro Motta, Ignazio L. Fragalà,
§
⊥
⊥
†
Chiara Massera, Luca Prodi, Marco Montalti, Monica Melegari,
,
‡
,†
Guglielmo G. Condorelli,* and Enrico Dalcanale*
Dipartimento di Chimica Organica e Industriale, UniVersity of Parma and INSTM UdR Parma,
V.le G. P. Usberti 17/A, 43100 Parma, Italy, Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche, UniVersity of
Catania and INSTM UdR Catania, V.le A. Doria 6, 95100 Catania, Italy, Dipartimento di
Chimica Generale ed Inorganica, Chimica Analitica, Chimica Fisica, UniVersity of Parma,
V.le G. P. Usberti 17/A, 43100 Parma, Italy, and Dipartimento di Chimica “G. Ciamician”,
Latemar Unit UniVersity of Bologna, Via Selmi 2, 40126 Bologna, Italy
Received March 4, 2009; E-mail: enrico.dalcanale@unipr.it; guidocon@unict.it
Abstract: A Si(100) surface featuring molecular recognition properties was obtained by covalent function-
alization with a tetraphosphonate cavitand (Tiiii), able to complex positively charged species. Tiiii cavitand
was grafted onto the Si by photochemical hydrosilylation together with 1-octene as a spatial spectator.
The recognition properties of the Si-Tiiii surface were demonstrated through two independent analytical
techniques, namely XPS and fluorescence spectroscopy, during the course of reversible complexation-
guest exchange-decomplexation cycles with specifically designed ammonium and pyridinium salts. Control
experiments employing a Si(100) surface functionalized with a structurally similar, but complexation inactive,
tetrathiophosphonate cavitand (TSiiii) demonstrated no recognition events. This provides evidence for the
complexation properties of the Si-Tiiii surface, ruling out the possibility of nonspecific interactions between
-
the substrate and the guests. The residual Si-O terminations on the surface replace the guests’ original
counterions, thus stabilizing the complex ion pairs. These results represent a further step toward the control
of self-assembly of complex supramolecular architectures on surfaces.
Introduction
molecular recognition is particularly noteworthy for its profound
impact on biology and materials science. In living organisms,
The introduction of specific functions onto surfaces represents
one of the major themes in contemporary chemistry. Notable
examples of functional surfaces include: self-cleaning surfaces
mimicking the lotus leaf, gecko-foot mimetic adhesive surfaces
featuring carbon nanotubes-decorated silicon wafers, mono-
layers with control of surface wettability via electrically triggered
conformational transitions, high density molecular electronic
memory using bistable rotaxanes as storage elements. Among
the several surface functions identified to be worth pursuing,
multiple recognition events trigger the immune system response
through antibodies, and they promote the adhesion of viruses
5
1
on cell surfaces. In nanotechnology, the controlled positioning
2
of molecules and assemblies on surfaces can be driven by
6
multiple binding events. Another significant field impacted by
3
molecular recognition on surfaces is chemical sensing, in which
7
4
the recognition process is translated into an analytical signal.
8
Organic monolayers hosted on inorganic surfaces represent
the best approach for harnessing the full potential of molecular
†
Dipartimento di Chimica Organica e Industriale, University of Parma
and INSTM UdR Parma.
‡
Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche, University of Catania and INSTM
(5) Mammen, M.; Choi, S.-K.; Whitesides, G. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
1998, 37, 2754–2794.
UdR Catania.
§
Dipartimento di Chimica Generale ed Inorganica, Chimica Analitica,
(6) (a) Ludden, M. J. W.; Reinhoudt, D. N.; Huskens, J. Chem. Soc. ReV.
2006, 35, 1122–1134. (b) Ludden, M. J. W.; Mulder, A.; Tamp e` , R.;
Reinhoudt, D. N.; Huskens, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 4104–
4107.
Chimica Fisica, University of Parma.
⊥
Dipartimento di Chimica “G. Ciamician”, Latemar Unit University of
Bologna.
(
1) (a) Erbil, H. Y.; Demirel, A. L.; Avci, Y.; Mert, O. Science 2003,
99, 1377–1380. (b) Li, X.-M.; Reinhoudt, D. N.; Crego-Calamata,
(7) (a) Lavigne, J. J.; Anslyn, E. V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40,
3118–3130. (b) Pirondini, L.; Dalcanale, E. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2007,
36, 695–706.
2
M. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2007, 36, 1350–1368.
(
(
2) Qu, L.; Dai, L.; Stone, M.; Xia, Z.; Wang, Z. L. Science 2008, 322,
(8) (a) Dubey, M.; Bernasek, S. L.; Schwartz, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007,
129, 6980–6981. (b) Zhang, S.; Cardona, C. M.; Echegoyen, L. Chem.
Commun. 2006, 4461–4473. (c) Facchetti, A.; Annoni, E.; Beverina,
L.; Morone, M.; Zhu, P.; Marks, T. J.; Pagani, G. A. Nat. Mater. 2004,
3, 910–917. (d) Liu, Z.; Yasseri, A. A.; Lindsey, J. S.; Bocian, D. F.
Science 2003, 302, 1543–1545. (e) Altman, M.; Shukla, A. D.; Zubkov,
T.; Evmenenko, G.; Dutta, P.; van der Boom, M. E. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2006, 128, 7374–7382. (f) Gupta, T.; van der Boom, M. E. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 8400–8401.
2
38–242.
3) Lahann, J.; Mitragotri, S.; Tran, T.-N.; Kaido, H.; Sundaram, J.; Choi,
I. S.; Hoffer, S.; Somorjai, G. A.; Langer, R. Science 2003, 299, 371–
3
74.
(
4) Green, J. E.; Choi, J. W.; Boukai, A.; Bunimovich, Y.; Johnston-
Halperin, E.; DeIonno, E.; Luo, Y.; Sheriff, B. A.; Xu, K.; Shin, Y. S.;
Tseng, H.-R.; Stoddart, J. F.; Heath, J. R. Nature 2007, 445, 414–
4
17.
10.1021/ja901678b CCC: $40.75 2009 American Chemical Society
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 2009, 131, 7447–7455 9 7447