COMMUNICATIONS
133.2, 130.4, 127.6, 70.4, 61.7, 30.7, 27.8, 23.2, 21.7; HR-MS (MALDI-FTMS):
diminished when a reduced amount of catalyst was used. Attempts to
further optimize the reaction conditions were also made by using a
variety of cosolvents of MeCN with other solvents, such as CHCl3,
CH2Cl2, toluene, and THF, in different ratios, but success was limited.
An excess amount of TsNCl2 (2.2 equiv) proved to be necessary for
the complete consumption of the olefin starting materials. With the
combination of rhodium/phosphane/4- MS in hand, we then went
back to examine the combination of triphenylphosphane with the
original rhodium compounds ([Rh(OAc)2]2 and [Rh(OOCCF3)2]2),
but failed to achieve any improvements. Surprisingly, when the
triphenylphosphane ligand was replaced by tributylphosphane, only a
tiny amount of the expected imidazolidine product was afforded, as
m/z [M 1] found: 337.0484, calcd for C15H18O3N2SCl2: 337.0488.
5: 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): d 7.69 (d, J 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.26 ± 7.18 (m,
6H), 6.88 (d, J 8.4 Hz, 2H), 5.21 (d, J 4.4 Hz, 1H), 4.56 (d, J 4.4 Hz,
1H), 3.81 (s, 3H), 2.42 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): d 169.7,
156.6, 145.7, 139.2, 133.8, 130.1, 128.8, 128.0, 127.7, 125.8, 72.0, 69.2, 61.4,
53.1, 21.6; HR-MS (MALDI-FTMS): m/z [M 1] found: 441.0446, calcd
for C19H18O4N2SCl2: 441.0437.
6: 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): d 7.70 (d, J 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.26 ± 7.19 (m,
6H), 6.90 (d, J 8.4 Hz, 2H), 5.20 (d, J 4.3 Hz, 1H), 4.55 (d, J 4.3 Hz,
1H), 4.23 (q, J 7.1 Hz, 2H), 2.42 (s, 3H), 1.29 (t, J 7.1 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR
(75 MHz, CDCl3): d 169.3, 156.6, 145.7, 139.3, 133.9, 130.0, 128.8, 128.0,
127.7, 125.8, 72.1, 69.3, 62.3, 61.5, 21.6, 14.0; HR-MS (MALDI-FTMS): m/z
1
revealed by crude H NMR analysis.
[13] L. I. Krimen, D. J. Cota, Org. React. 1969, 17, 213 ± 325.
[14] S.-J. Chang, Org. Process Res. Dev. 1999, 3, 232 ± 234.
[M 1] found: 455.0587, calcd for C20H20O4N2SCl2: 455.0594.
7: 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): d 7.70 (dd, J 1.8, 6.6 Hz, 2H), 7.27 ± 7.24
(m, 2H), 7.18 (s, 1H), 6.90 (d, J 8.2 Hz, 2H), 6.77 (d, J 8.0 Hz, 2H), 5.17
(d, J 4.4 Hz, 1H), 4.54 (d, J 4.4 Hz, 1H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 2.43 (s, 3H), 2.30
(s, 3H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): d 169.8, 156.4, 145.7, 137.9, 136.3,
133.9, 130.0, 129.4, 127.7, 125.7, 71.9, 69.2, 61.4, 53.1, 21.6, 21.1; HR-MS
(MALDI-FTMS): m/z [M 1] found: 455.0597, calcd for C20H20O4N2SCl2:
455.0594.
8: 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): d 7.83 (dd, J 1.9, 6.6 Hz, 2H), 7.38 (dd,
J 1.9, 6.6 Hz, 2H), 7.05 (s, 1H), 4.33 (s, 1H), 3.68 (s, 3H), 2.46 (s, 3H), 1.26
(s, 3H), 1.12 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): d 168. 5, 153.3, 145.6,
134.3, 130.0, 127.8, 70.9, 69.5, 61.4, 52.3, 29.3, 23.1, 21.7; HR-MS (MALDI-
Efficient, Catalytic, Aerobic Oxidation of
Alcohols with Octahedral Molecular Sieves**
Young-Chan Son, Vinit D. Makwana, Amy R. Howell,
and Steven L. Suib*
FTMS): m/z [M 1] found: 393.0437, calcd for C15H18O4N2SCl2: 393.0449.
Received: June 18, 2001 [Z17296]
The oxidation of alcohols to carbonyl compounds is of great
interest to the fine chemicals industry and academia. Re-
cently, catalytic oxidations of alcohols in which oxygen is the
secondary oxidant have been the focus in many laborato-
ries.[1±6] Alcohol oxidations using Ru,[2] Co,[3] Cu,[4] Pd,[5] and
Pt[6] metal catalysts with additives, such as potassium carbo-
nate, sodium bicarbonate, pyridine, molecular sieves, and
phenanthroline, have been reported.
Stoichiometric metal oxidants such as chromates and active
manganese dioxide have also been widely used.[7] In fact,
conventional active manganese oxide has been most com-
monly used for allylic and benzylic oxidations. The reactivity
of active manganese oxide is dependent on preparation
methods, compositions, and structure.[7b, 8] Complicated prep-
aration methods are often necessary, and the use of freshly
made active manganese oxide is required. Moreover, five to
fifty equivalents of this reagent are required to obtain
oxidation products, which results in large amounts of non-
reusable, toxic waste.
[1] a) E. Block, A. L. Schwan in Comprehensive Organic Synthesis, Vol. 4
(Eds.: B. M. Trost, I. Fleming, M. F. Semmelhack), Pergamon, Oxford,
1991, pp. 329 ± 362; b) L. S. Hegedus in Comprehensive Organic
Synthesis, Vol. 4 (Eds.: B. M. Trost, I. Fleming, M. F. Semmelhack),
Pergamon, Oxford, 1991, pp. 551 ± 570.
[2] a) B. M. Trost, A. B. Pinkerton, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 8081 ±
8082; b) B. M. Trost, A. B. Pinkerton, Angew. Chem. 2000, 112, 368 ±
370; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 360 ± 362.
[3] For leading reviews of multicomponent reaction, see a) A. Dömling, I.
Ugi, Angew. Chem. 2000, 112, 3300 ± 3344; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2000, 39, 3169 ± 3210; b) S. Kobayashi, Chem. Soc. Rev. 1999, 28, 1 ± 26.
For episulfonium and episelenium ions, see refs. [4] and [5].
[4] J. Winkler, M. Finck-Estes, Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 7293 ± 7296.
[5] a) A. Bewick, J. M. Mellor, W. M. Owton, J. Chem. Perkin Trans. 1
1985, 1039 ± 1044; b) A. Bewick, D. E. Coe, G. B. Fuller, J. M. Mellor,
Tetrahedron Lett. 1980, 21, 3827 ± 3828.
[6] a) G. Li, H.-X. Wei, S. H. Kim, M. Neighbors, Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 395 ±
397; b) G. Li, H.-X. Wei, S. H. Kim, Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 2249 ± 2252.
[7] G. Li, H.-X. Wei, S. H. Kim, Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 8699 ± 8701.
[8] M. R. Grimmett in Comprehensive Heterocyclic Chemistry, Vol. 5
(Eds.: A. R. Katritzky, C. W. Rees), Pergamon, Oxford, 1984,
pp. 345 ± 457.
The problems associated with active manganese oxides
prompted us to examine octahedral molecular sieves (OMS)
as potential catalysts for alcohol oxidations. OMS materials
[9] D. Lucet, T. Le Gall, C. Mioskowski, Angew. Chem. 1998, 110, 2724 ±
2772; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 2580 ± 2627.
[10] a) E. J. Corey, D.-H. Lee, S. Sarshar, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1995, 6,
3 ± 6; b) A. O. Chong, K. Oshima, K. B. Sharpless, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1977, 99, 3420 ± 3426; c) M. Reetz, R. Jaeger, R. Drewlies, M. M.
Hübel, Angew. Chem. 1991, 103, 76 ± 78; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1991,
30, 103 ± 105; d) T. Hayashi, E. Kishi, V. A. Soloshonok, Y. Uozumi,
Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 4969 ± 4972; e) M. E. Solomon, C. L.
Lynch, D. H. Rich, Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 4955 ± 4958.
[11] a) M. P. Doyle, Chem. Rev. 1986, 86, 919 ± 939; b) M. P. Doyle,
Aldrichimica Acta. 1996, 29, 3 ± 11; c) H. M. L. Davies, Aldrichimica
Acta 1997, 30, 107 ± 114.
[12] The common quenching treatment with aqueous Na2SO3 for N,N-
dichlorosulfonamide-based reactions was not used to avoid some
unknown side products. The loading of triphenylphosphane and the
rhodium(ii) heptafluorobutyrate dimer at 4.0 and 2.0 mol%, respec-
tively, turned out to be near the turnover point since the reaction was
not further accelerated in the presence of larger amounts of the
catalyst. On the other hand, both the reaction rate and yield were
[*] Prof. S. L. Suib
U-3060, Department of Chemistry
Department of Chemical Engineering and Institute of Materials
Science
University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269 (USA)
Fax : (1)860-486-2981
Y.-C. Son, V. D. Makwana, Prof. A. R. Howell
U-3060, Department of Chemistry, University of Connecticut
Storrs, CT 06269-3060 (USA)
[**] We acknowledge support of the Geosciences and Biosciences
Division, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Office of Science, U.S.
Department of Energy. We also thank Professor Mark E. Davis, Dr.
Francis Galasso, and Dr. Lixin Cao for helpful discussions.
4280
ꢀ WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH, D-69451 Weinheim, 2001
1433-7851/01/4022-4280 $ 17.50+.50/0
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, No. 22