Identification of Bacteria in Mushroom Compost Using Ribosomal RNA Sequence
DNA Analyses
Total DNA extracted from mushroom compost (100-140 ng) or from individual
colonies (5 µl) was amplified in a 50 µl PCR mixture (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.3], 50
mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.001% gelatin, each dNTP at 0.25 mM, 0.2 µM of each
primer, and 2.5 units of Taq polymerase) using a PTC-100 thermal cycler (MJ Re-
search, Watertown, MA). The primers, 530F and 1494R, were designed as previous-
ly described (Borneman et al. 1996). This mixture was subjected to 30 cycles of am-
plification (one cycle of 1 min at 96°C, 30 sec at 50°C, and 1 min at 72°C followed by
2
9 cycles of 30 sec at 94°C, 20 sec at 55°C, and 1 min at 72°C) followed by a 2 min ex-
tension at 72°C. The amplified DNA was separated on a 1 % agarose gel. A DNA frag-
ment of approximately 1 kb was cut from the gel and purified using the QIAquick
gel extraction kit (QIAGENE, Valencia, California), which was then ligated to the
pGEM-T vector (Promega, Madison, WI). Competent cells of Escherichia coli were
transformed with the ligated DNA and then plated on LB plates containing ampi-
cillin and X-Gal (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-ß-D-galactopyranoside). White E. coli
colonies, presumably carrying pGEM-T with an rDNA insert, were transferred to 96-
well microtiter plates containing LB-ampicillin and cultured, and the plates were
stored at –80°C after adding 1/3 vol of 80% glycerol. Plasmid DNA was prepared
from clones in this rDNA library using the QIAprep kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, Cali-
fornia) and sequenced using the T7 primer and the Big Dye terminator sequencing
kit (Perkin-Elmer, Foster City, California). The sequencing reactions were analyzed
using an automated DNA sequencer, ABI377 (PE Applied Biosystems, Foster City,
California). The PCR fragments from the cultured cells were directly sequenced us-
ing 530FS (5’-GAGTGCCAGCMGCCGCGG-3’) primer. The sequence of rDNA was
compared with the sequences in the nonredundant nucleotide database available
through the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI, Bethesda, Mary-
land) using the BLAST algorithm (Altschul et al. 1997).
Results
DNA Extraction From Mushroom Compost
We have modified a previously reported method (Borneman et al. 1996) to extract
DNA from a bulk mushroom compost sample taken after pasteurization during Phase
II composting. This modified method utilizes a vortex instead of a special bead beater
to mechanically lyse microorganisms. The extracted DNA was subsequently purified.
Yields of DNA per gram of the compost ranged from 55 µg to 74 µg (Table 1). Grind-
ing the compost samples prior to DNA extraction significantly increased yield (21 to
3
5%) relative to unground samples. In
the absence of grinding, increased vor-
texing (30 min vs. 15 min) appeared to
have increased the yield slightly (11%).
However, when the compost was ground
before DNA extraction, we observed no
increase in yield with 30 minutes of vor-
texing, suggesting that 15 minutes of vor-
texing is sufficient for an efficient DNA
extraction. Gel electrophoresis showed
that the size of the purified DNA frag-
TABLE 1.
DNA yields from four different extraction
conditions
No
Grinding
Grinding
Length of Vortexing
DNA Yielda
15 min 30 min 15 min 30 min
55 61 74 74
aµg of DNA per 1 g of compost. The data were from a
single experiment. We assumed that 1 O.D.
corresponds to 50 µg DNA per ml.
260
Compost Science & Utilization
Summer 2000 249