Radiation-Activated Antitumor Prodrugs
J . Org. Chem., Vol. 65, No. 15, 2000 4643
erably stable electron adduct at the 5-fluorouracil moiety
with a lifetime of 8 ms.
Sch em e 2
For characterizing the one-electron reduction reactiv-
ity, X-radiolyses of 2-oxo compounds 3-11 (1 mM) in Ar-
purged phosphate buffer solutions containing excess
amount (1 M) of 2-methyl-2-propanol were carried out
at room temperature. In the radiolysis of a diluted
aqueous solution, water radicals such as oxidizing hy-
•
-
droxyl radicals ( OH), reducing hydrated electrons (eaq ),
•
and reducing hydrogen atoms (H ) are primarily gener-
1
2
•
-7
-1
ated with the G values of G( OH) ) 2.8 × 10 mol J
G(eaq ) ) 2.8 × 10 mol J , and G(H ) ) 0.6 × 10 mol
(reaction 1). Under the present conditions, the OH
,
-
-7
-1
•
-7
-
1
J
radicals are scavenged by excess 2-methyl-2-propanol into
substantially unreactive 2-methyl-2-propanol radicals
•
(
CH
2
(CH
3
)
2
COH) as in reaction 2. Thus, the hydrated
in Ar-purged methanol up to 90% decomposition resulted
in no free 5-fluorouracil 1. For comparison, representative
X-radiolysis of 6 in Ar-purged methanol was performed
to obtain the G values for the decomposition of 6 and the
formation of 1 as 1.2 and 0.78 (65% selectivity), respec-
tively. These results may be rationalized by a mechanism
involving one-electron reductive dissociation of the C(1′)-
N(1) bond of 3-11 into N(1)-deprotonated 5-fluorouracil
-
-
13
electrons eaq (E(nH
2
O/eaq ) ) -2.9 V vs NHE at pH
7
.0) are involved as the reductants for 3-11. Smaller
•
+
•
amount of the hydrogen atoms H (E(H /H ) ) -2.4 V vs
NHE13 at pH 7.0) would make relatively minor contribu-
tion to the reaction of 3-11, although they add to the
double bonds of pyrimidines.14
•
•
-
-
anion 1(-H) and 2-oxocycloalkyl radical (2-oxopropyl
H O f OH + H + e
(1)
2
aq
radical in the case of 3), as illustrated in Scheme 2.
Evidently, 2′-oxo group is an essential part of the radia-
tion-activated antitumor prodrugs that undergo one-
electron reductive C(1′)-N(1) bond dissociation to release
•
•
OH + (CH ) COH f H O + CH (CH ) COH (2)
3
3
2
2
3 2
In the case of water-insoluble compound 13, Ar-purged
5
-fluorouracil 1 in sufficient yield.
methanol solution was similarly X-irradiated. This reac-
tion system involves solvated electrons eMeOH and reduc-
ing radicals CH
concomitant primary radicals such as CH
and CH
ditionally the reducing radicals CH
Analytical HPLC of the X-irradiated solutions by
reference to authentic samples indicated that all the
X-r a y Cr ysta l Str u ctu r e a n d Ca lcu la ted Elec-
-
tr on ic Str u ctu r e. X-ray studies of single crystals were
carried out to elucidate the detailed structures of some
representative compounds 3-5 and 7-9. As illustrated
in Figure 1, the X-ray structures revealed that the C(1′)-
N(1) bonds of all compounds determined possess normal
geometry and bond lengths ranging from 1.41 to 1.49 Å.
The distortion angles of these 2-oxo compounds between
the C(1′)-N(1) bond and the C(2′)dO bond were -3.5°
•
2
OH for the reduction of 13, since the
•
•
•
3
O , H , OH,
•
3
react rapidly with methanol to produce ad-
•
15
2
OH.
2
-oxo compounds 3-11 release 5-fluorouracil 1 as a major
-
product upon reduction by hydrated electrons eaq . A few
fragments with higher polarity were also produced in
each reaction, as eluted faster in the HPLC. These
products may be derived from degradation such as
pyrimidine ring opening reaction, although they could not
be identified. The residual 2-oxoalkane moiety resulted
from the 5-fluorouracil release is also a possible product,
but could not be detected by NMR analysis of each
reaction mixture obtained after evaporation. Table 1 lists
the G values for the decomposition of 3-11 and the
formation of 5-fluorouracil 1 in the X-radiolytic reduction.
In a separate experiment we also confirmed that 5-fluoro-
(
(
3), -4.8° (4), 35.6° (5), -28.0° (7), 135.9° (8), and 3.8°
9), respectively. Thus, comparing these compounds with
each other, there would be no great difference in the
extent of overlapping between the C(2′)dO π MO and the
C(1′)-N(1) σ MO in the crystal. In fluid solution, how-
ever, conformational changes will be allowed for the 2-oxo
compounds under the influence of their molecular struc-
tures, causing various extents of overlapping of hypo-
thetical C(2′)dO π* radical anion with C(1′)-N(1) σ* MO.
Such an accessible conformational change in fluid solu-
tion may account for the observation that both the one-
electron reductive decomposition and the release of
1
-propyluracil 12, as a non-2-oxo analogue of 3, did not
5
-fluorouracil 1 varied depending on the molecular
release 1 upon X-irradiation up to 80% decomposition
under similar conditions. Furthermore, X-radiolysis of 13
structures of 2-oxo compounds (Table 1).
For better understanding of the electronic structural
characteristics of 2′-oxo substituent that is crucial for
promoting the one-electron reductive release of 5-fluo-
(11) (a) Mori, M.; Teshima, S.; Hatta, H.; Fujita, S.; Taniguchi, R.;
Nishimoto, S. Unpublished data. In the pulse radiolysis of 2 in Ar-
purged aqueous solution containing 2-methyl-2-propanol using pulsed
electron beam with a half-width duration 1 µs, we observed a transient
absorption spectrum with a maximum wavelength at 340 nm which
was almost identical with that of 5-fluorouracil radical anion (see also
ref 11b). (b) Rivera, E.; Schuler, R. H. J . Phys. Chem. 1983, 87, 3966-
1
6
rouracil 1, MO calculations by the AM1 method were
performed for the 2-oxo compounds 3-11. Figure 2 shows
representatively the LUMO and LUMO + 1 of compound
6. Each compound has similar LUMO that is primarily
localized at the π* orbital of C(5)-C(6) double bond of
the 5-fluorouracil moiety, as in Figure 2, therein accept-
ing hydrated electron to form the most stable radical
3
971.
12) The number of molecules produced or changed per 1 J of
radiation energy absorbed by the reaction system (see also ref 2).
(
(
13) Wardman, P. J . Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1989, 18, 1637-1755.
(14) (a) Neta, P.; Schuler, R. H. Radiat. Res. 1971, 47, 612-627. (b)
Das, S.; Deeble, D. J . Z. Naturforsch. 1985, 40c, 292-294.
(15) Bensasson, R. V.; Land, E. J .; Truscott, T. G. Excited States
(16) Dewar, M. J . S.; Zoebisch, E. G.; Healy, E. F.; Stewart, J . J . P.
J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 3902-3909. The AM1 calculations were
performed using the CAChe software.
and Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine; Oxford University Press:
Oxford, 1993.