allylic protons by bridged carbons from an approach of a
base.
results observed in runs 1, 2, and 4 (Table 3) suggest that
(Z)-allylboranes are formed selectively via transmetalation
between Et3B and π-allylpalladium species (syn- or anti-
isomer, which might equilibrate to each other) and react with
trans-imine through a transition state II (ML2 ) BEt2).11 To
the best of our knowledge, however, this is the first example
demonstrating anti-selectivity for the allylation of imines
starting with trans-crotyl-type (and R-methylallyl-) sub-
strates; all precedents starting with trans-crotyl substrates
suppose a transition state like I to rationalize their syn-
selective allylations.5,12 These transition states I and II share
a common structural feature, placing both substituents of
trans-aldimine at quasi-diaxial position of cyclic six-
membered chairlike conformation (Scheme 3). The confor-
As is expected,1 all allylic alcohols examined showed the
same regioselectivity providing the most branched homo-
allylamines (runs 1-4, Table 3); however, the stereoselec-
Table 3. Allylation of Benzaldehyde-p-Anisidine Imine with
Substituted Allylic Alcoholsa
Scheme 3. The Most Probable Transition State Leading to
anti-1
a See footnote a in Table 1. b See footnote b in Table 1. c Ratios were
1
determined on the basis of H NMR (400 MHz).
mation is preferred over the corresponding quasi-diequatorial
conformation because the latter experiences severe gauche
repulsion between p-anisyl and the ligands on metal (in this
case, two Et groups on B).13 A transition state III that is
characterized by cis-imine is another candidate, which seems
to be most stable because of no 1,3-diaxial repulsions. At
the moment, it is premature to assign which of the transitions
states II or III is responsible; the former supposing (Z)-
tivity was quite unexpected and turned out to be subject to
the kind of substituents and the substitution patterns. Gener-
ally, R-substituted allylic alcohols showed higher stereose-
lectivity, giving anti-1 preferentially over syn-1 (runs 1 vs 2
and runs 3 vs 4). Furthermore, in contrast to many prece-
dents1,5,6 indicating that phenyl group generally displays
better stereoselectivity than methyl group does, in the present
case, methyl group showed higher selectivity than phenyl
group (runs 2 vs 4).7 The structure of anti-1n was verified
(6) For example, in the presence of Pd(PPh3)4 (5 mol %) and Et2Zn (240
mol %) in THF (3 mL)-n-hexane (1.2 mL) at room temperature, R- and
γ-methylallyl alcohols (1 mmol) react with benzaldehyde (1.2 mmol) to
provide mixtures of anti- and syn-2-methyl-1-phenyl-3-buten-1-ols in the
same ratio (2.4:1). The same reactions with R- and γ-phenylallyl alcohols
provide anti- and syn-1,2-diphenyl-3-buten-1-ols in the same, but in higher
ratios of 10:1: Tamaru, Y. J. Organomet. Chem. 1999, 576, 215.
(7) Under present conditions, 1,3-disubstituted allylic alcohols, such as
1,3-dimethylallyl alcohols and 2-cyclohexenol, failed to give expected
homoallylamines.
1
by the comparison of the H NMR spectral data with those
of an authentic sample after conversion to an amine 2
(Scheme 2).8 Furthermore, the structure of anti-1n was
(8) Hoffmann, R. W.; Endesfelder, A. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1987, 215.
(9) Crystallographic data (excluding structure factors) for the structure
of 2 have been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre
as supplementary publication no. CCDC-256123. Copies of the data can
be obtained free of charge on application to CCDC, 12 Union Road,
Cambridge CB21EZ, UK (fax: (+44)1223-336-033; e-mail: deposit@
ccdc.cam.ac.uk).
Scheme 2. Structure Determination of anti-1n
(10) Itsuno, S.; Watanabe, K.; Ito, K.; El-Shehawy, A. A.; Sarhan, A.
A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1997, 36, 109.
(11) (a) Hirabayashi, R.; Ogawa, C.; Sugiura, M. Kobayashi, S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 9493. (b) Kobayashi, S.; Ogawa, C.; Konishi, H.;
Sugiura, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 6610.
(12) (a) Shibata, I.; Nose, K.; Sakamoto, K.; Yasuda, M.; Baba, A. J.
Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 2158. (b) Yanada, R.; Kaieda, A.; Takemoto, Y. J.
Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 7516. (c). Cooper, I. R.; Grigg, R.; MacLachlan, W.
S.; Thornton-Pett, M. Sridharan, V. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 2002,
1372.
determined unequivocally by X-ray crystallographic analysis
of the tosylamide derivative.9
Under the reaction conditions, allylboranes are expected
to react with an imine as soon as it is formed;10 hence, the
(13) Kimura, M.; Miyachi, A.; Kojima, K.; Tanaka, S.; Tamaru, Y. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 14360.
(5) Kumar, S.; Kaur, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 3413.
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 4, 2005
639