X. Zhang et al.
Fitoterapia133(2019)146–149
Table 1
solvent system of CHCl3/acetone (50:1, v/v), and further purified by
repeated Sephadex LH-20 (MeOH) to afford compound 3 (6.3 mg).
1H and 13C NMR data for compounds 1–3 (δ in ppm, J in Hz).
20.8
Fern-7(8)-en-19α, 28-diol (1). White amorphous powder; [α]D
−72.3° (c 0.1, MeOH); IR (KBr) νmax 3210 (OH), 2922, 1471, 1455,
1383, 1366, 1066, 1018 cm−1; for 1H (pyridine-d5, 500 MHz) and 13C
NMR (pyridine-d5, 125 MHz) spectroscopic data, see Table 1; positive
δH
δC
δH
δC
δH
δC
1
1.58, m
39.1, CH2 1.57, m
0.90, brd
39.3, CH2 1.57, m
1.76, brd
17.3, CH2
HRESIMS m/z 465.3705 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C30H50O2Na+
,
0.88, brd
(3.8)
465.3703).
(3.6)
(3.3)
2
3
1.54, m
1.42, m
1.14, m
1.39, m
19.8, CH2 1.60, m
1.43, m
42.9, CH2 1.21, m
1.39, m
18.5, CH2 1.66, m
1.95, m
41.9, CH2 3.55, m
31.1, CH2
76.5, CH
Pteron-14-ene-7α,19α,28-triol (2). White amorphous powder;
[α]D20.8 −80.6° (c 0.13, MeOH); IR (KBr) νmax 3355 (OH), 2929, 1470,
1441, 1389, 1046 cm−1; for 1H (CDCl3, 500 MHz) and 13C NMR (CDCl3,
125 MHz) spectroscopic data, see Table 1; positive HRESIMS m/z
481.3650 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C30H50O3Na+, 481.3652).
3β,4α,25-Trihydroxyfilican (3). White amorphous powder;
[α]D20.4 + 2.0° (c 0.1, MeOH); IR (KBr) νmax 3395 (OH), 2946, 1468,
1452, 1377, 1055, 1034 cm−1; for 1H (CDCl3, 500 MHz) and 13C NMR
(CDCl3, 125 MHz) spectroscopic data, see Table 1; positive HRESIMS
m/z 483.3806 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C30H52O3Na+, 483.3809).
4
5
6
33.7, C
32.6, C
47.4, CH
24.1, CH2 1.48, m
76.2, C
41.7, C
34.5, CH2
1.36, m
2.16, m
1.88, m
52.0, CH
1.49, m
25.3, CH2 1.85, m
1.69, dd
(13.0, 1.1)
117.6, CH 3.87, m
7
5.46, brd
(3.4)
72.7, CH
1.44, m
1.40, m
1.69, m
17.0, CH2
8
9
10
11
145.9, C
45.5, C
42.1, CH
38.0, C
49.5, CH
42.0, C
53.3, CH
30.0, CH2
2.53, m
1.68, m
1.57, m
49.0, CH
36.2, C
2.13, m
2.4. Antifungal assay
16.9, CH2 1.82, m
1.48, m
32.2, CH2 2.07, m
1.31, m
37.6, C
43.6. C
15.4, CH2 1.85, m
1.05, m
32.2, CH2 1.51, m
Compounds 1–3 were evaluated for their antifungal activity against
eight agricultural pathogenic fungi, including Sclerotinia sclerotiorun,
Helminthosporium maydis, Verticillium dahliae Kleb, Phytophthora para-
sitica, Gibberella saubinetii, Alternaria alternata, Botrytis cinerea Pers., and
Colletotrichum acutatum Simmonds, by using the microbroth dilution
method according to the procedures previously described in the lit-
12
30.1, CH2
13
14
15
36.6, C
154.3, C
39.0, C
39.7, C
29.2, CH2
1.57, m
1.72, m
2.48, m
1.79, m
32.1, CH2 5.36, t (3.7) 118.6, CH 1.97, m
16
44.5, CH2 2.13, m
2.02, m
48.0, C
40.0, CH2 1.62, m
35.8, CH2
17
18
44.9, C
42.7, C
51.6, CH
1.54,
58.2, CH
1.36, brs.
4.39, m
61.7, CH
70.7, CH
1.55, m
1.33, m
2.5. Antibacterial assay
overlap
4.55, m
1.78, m
1.50, m
1.01, m
2.18, m
0.84, s
0.90, s
0.83, s
19
20
70.5, CH
19.9, CH2
28.4, CH2
35.5, CH2 2.43, m
1.39, m
43.7, CH2 1.83, m
1.18, m
Compounds 1–3 were also evaluated for their antibacterial activity.
Eight bacterial strains, including Micrococcus lysodeikticus, Micrococcus
luteus, Bacillus megaterium, Bacterium paratyphosum B, methicillin-re-
sistant Staphyloccocus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli,
and Vibrio Parahemolyticus, were used in this study. The minimum in-
hibitory concentrations (MIC) of samples and positive control were
determined in sterile 96-well plates by the modified broth dilution test
as previously described procedures [12,13].
21
22
23
24
25
59.7, CH
30.5, CH
1.08, m
1.89, m
58.2, CH
29.7, CH
0.97, m
1.42, m
60.0, CH
30.8, CH
21.5, CH3
18.0, CH3
64.2, CH2
33.4, CH3 0.87, s
21.8, CH3 0.81, s
13.6, CH3 0.88, s
33.0, CH3 1.23, s
21.5, CH3 1.13, s
15.4, CH3 3.89, d
(11.8)
3.82, d
(11.8)
26
27
28
1.16, s
1.74, s
3.90, d
(11.6)
4.33, d
(11.6)
1.06, d
(6.5)
24.9, CH3 1.04, s
23.8, CH3 1.49, s
63.2, CH2 3.84, d
(11.4)
28.1, CH3 0.94, s
22.4, CH3 0.96, s
63.3, CH2 0.77, s
15.1, CH3
15.8, CH3
16.3, CH3
3. Results and discussion
Compound 1 was obtained as a white amorphous powder. Its mo-
lecular formula, C30H50O2, was determined by (+) HRESIMS at m/z
465.3705 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C30H50O2Na+, 465.3703), suggesting 6
indices of hydrogen deficiency. The IR spectrum showed the presence of
3.73, d
(11.4)
29
30
24.2, CH3 0.97, d (6.5) 22.8, CH3 0.82, d
22.9, CH3
21.9, CH3
(6.5)
23.7, CH3 0.89, d (6.5) 22.8, CH3 0.88, d
(6.5)
0.96, d
(6.5)
hydroxy group (3210 cm−1
) and aliphatic CeH stretching group
(2922 cm−1). The 1H NMR data of 1 (Table 1) revealed characteristic
resonances for two secondary methyls [δH 1.06 (d, H3–29) and 0.96 (d,
H3–30)], five tertiary methyls [δH 0.84 (s, H3–23), 0.90 (s, H3–24), 0.83
(s, H3–25), 1.16 (s, H3–26) and 1.74 (s, H3–27)], a pair of oxygenated
methylenes (δH 3.89, 4.33), an oxygenated methine (δH 4.55), and one
olefinic proton (δH 5.46). Its 13C NMR spectroscopic data (Table 1)
exhibited 30 carbons, which were assigned to a trisubstituted double
bond, seven methyls, ten methylenes (including one oxygenated), six
methines (one of which was oxygenated), and five sp3 quaternary car-
bons. Comparison of the NMR data of 1 with those of one closely related
compound, fern-9(11)-en-28-ol previously reported from this plant [8],
revealed that both compounds possessed the same hopane-type tri-
terpene skeleton, as confirmed by 2D NMR experiments (Figs. 2 and 3).
The key differences were found that the chemical shifts at C-7, C-8, C-9,
C-11, and C-19 in 1 were quite different from those of fern-9(11)-en-28-
ol. The observed HMBC correlations (Fig. 2) of H-7 with C-5 and C-9, H-
19 with C-13, C-17 and C-21, in conjunction with 1H, 1H COSY corre-
lations (Fig. 2) of H-5/H2-6/H-7 and H-18/H-19/H2-20/H-21/H-22/H3-
29(/H3-30), revealed that the Δ9,11 double bond in fern-9(11)-en-28-ol
a
b
Measured in pyridine-d5.
Measured in CDCl3.
2.3. Extraction and isolation
The air-dried and powdered plants of A. capillus-veneris (9.5 kg)
were extracted three times with 95% EtOH (15 L/each time), and the
combined extracts were evaporated in vacuum to afford 1.17 kg of
crude extract. The crude extract was directly subjected to chromato-
graphy column (CC) on silica gel using a petroleum ether/acetone
gradient elution to yield ten fractions (A1-A10) according to TLC de-
tection on silica gel plates. Subfraction A3 (3.5 g) was fractionated by
Sephadex LH-20 (MeOH), and further purified by silica gel CC (petro-
leum ether/acetone, 10:1, v/v) to yield compound
2 (10 mg).
Compound 1 (8.5 mg) was isolated from subfraction A5 (15.8 g) by
repeated silica gel CC and Sephadex LH-20 (CHCl3/MeOH, 1:1, v/v).
Subfraction A8 (10.3 g) was separated by silica gel CC eluted with a
147