Crystal Growth & Design
Article
of X (32.1−34.4°) is smaller than that in the optimized structure
(40.6°). This difference could be understood in terms of the
different substitution fashion of terminal carboxyl units. Figure
2c shows the theoretically calculated relative energies of ThTCA
and X and those without terminal carboxyl units (1 and Y)
against the bend angle θ. As demonstrated for 1 and Y without
terminal carboxyl groups, the tetrathienylene π unit is
energetically flexible; only a few kcal/mol are necessary to
change the COT bend angle 10° from the optimized structure.
While this flexible structural feature is maintained in X with
terminal carboxyl units, the flexibility of the central tetra[3,4]-
thienylene π unit significantly decreases with the introduction of
carboxyl groups (ThTCA), which is due to the steric repulsion
of carboxyl groups. Due to the less symmetric arrangement of
terminal carboxyl groups and the higher energy required to
modulate the molecular structure of the central twisted π unit,
ThTCA forms versatile solvated molecular assemblies with
hydrogen-bonding interactions between guest solvent mole-
cules.
Table 2. Adsorption of the Solvents to ThTCAdesol
single
single
a
solvent
adsorption
crystal
solvent
adsorption
crystal
H2O
MeOH
EtOH
1-PrOH
2-PrOH
1-BuOH
t-BuOH
benzene
×
×
○
×
○
×
×
×
○
○
○
×
○
×
hexane
THF
×
○
○
○
○
×
×
×
e
○
○
○
b
c
dioxane
DMSO
pyridine
quinoline
CH3CN
AcOEt
d
e
e
f
△
○
×
○
×
×
×
a
b
Availability of single crystal by recrystallization. 2 equiv of solvent
molecules were adsorbed overnight, followed by an additional 2 equiv
c
of solvent molecules. 2.5 equiv of solvent molecules were adsorbed.
d
e
2 equiv of solvent molecules were adsorbed. The same amount of
solvent molecules was adsorbed as in the corresponding solvate single
f
crystals. Poor crystallinity.
hand, solvents from which single crystals of ThTCA did not
form were not adsorbed to ThTCAdesol crystal.
Encouraged by the versatile solvated assemblies of ThTCA
and the flexible twisted ThTCA π unit, we performed desorption
and readsorption17,18 of solvent molecules with ThTCA solvate
crystals. The thermogravimetry (TG) curve of ThTCA revealed
the quantitative desorption of solvate molecules before
decomposition (>340 °C) from all of the obtained solvate
crystals (Figure 7a and Figure S8). For example, weight losses of
ca. 15 and 25% were observed at 120 °C for ThTCA·(H2O)5
and ThTCA·(EtOH)4, respectively, which correspond to the
quantitative desorption of solvate molecules. The plateaus were
maintained up to 330 °C, demonstrating the high thermal
stability of the ThTCA molecule even after desorption. There
was no distinct color change during desorption of the solvent
from solvate ThTCA crystals. Unfortunately, we could not
obtain nonsolvated single crystals to discuss the molecular
assembly. Thus, we performed powder XRD measurements for
the desolvated crystals. The desolvated crystals were prepared by
annealing solvated single crystals at an appropriate temperature
(determined on the basis of the TG curve) under ambient
atmosphere. Figure 7b shows the powder XRD pattern of
desolvated crystal prepared from a series of solvated crystals.
While completely different assemblies of ThTCA were observed
in solvated crystals, the diffraction pattern of the crystals
converged to the same diffraction pattern by desolvation, which
indicates the formation of the same molecular assemblies of
ThTCA from different solvate crystals by solvent desorption.
This could be accounted for by the high bonding energy of
hydrogen bonds between carboxyl groups and the relatively easy
reorganization of the molecule due to the flexible twisted
ThTCA π core.
The possible readsorption of solvents of the desolvated crystal
ThTCA (ThTCAdesol) was systematically screened with a
variety of solvents, including solvents that afford solvated
ThTCA crystals and other solvents such as longer primary
alcohols, including 1-PrOH and 1-BuOH, tert-BuOH, and the
aprotic solvents benzene and hexane. The ThTCAdesol crystals
were exposed to vapor of the solvents in separate closet-vials.
After the samples were exposed to the vapor overnight, solvent
readsorption was confirmed by TG measurements, as
summarized in Table 2. The solvents that gave solvate single
crystals such as EtOH, 2-PrOH, THF, dioxane, and DMSO were
readsorbed to ThTCAdesol crystal, albeit there were a few
exceptions, including AcOEt, MeOH, and H2O. On the other
To reveal the detailed mechanism of the selective read-
sorption of the solvents to ThTCAdesol, we compared the
powder XRD patterns during desorption and readsorption.
Figure 8a shows powder XRD patterns of crystal ThTCA·
(EtOH)4, ThTCAdesol, and the readsorbed sample of ThTCA·
(EtOH)4. The thermal annealing of ThTCA·(EtOH)4 crystals
at 423 K revealed a shift and disappearance of Bragg diffraction
peaks, which was consistent with a change in the packing
structure from ThTCA·(EtOH)4 to ThTCAdesol while main-
taining high crystallinity. After readsorption of the EtOH
molecule, the PXRD pattern was completely consistent with that
of as-grown ThTCA·(EtOH)4, indicating a reversible and cyclic
structural transformation between desolvated ThTCA crystals
and solvated ThTCA·(EtOH)4 upon the adsorption−desorp-
tion of EtOH. A similar change in the PXRD pattern was
observed with ThTCA·(2-PrOH)4 during desorption and
readsorption (Figure S10). Figure 8b shows the adsorption−
desorption isotherms of desolvated ThTCA crystals for primary
alcohols. Gate-opening EtOH adsorption behavior was observed
at P/P0 ∼ 0.7, and the amount of saturated adsorption was
similar to 2.0 mol mol−1. This amount was inconsistent with that
determined by TG measurement, which is due to fast adsorption
to one of two sites (site A or B, Figure 5), followed by slow
details). Once an EtOH molecule was adsorbed, the adsorption
state was maintained until P/P0 ∼ 0.1 in the desorption process.
This gate-opening sorption mechanism with huge hysteresis for
adsorption−desorption is characteristic of adsorption accom-
panied by a structural change. The adsorption isotherm clearly
demonstrated the selective adsorption of EtOH among the
primary alcohols.
The selective solvent sorption behavior could be understood
in terms of the stabilization energy upon solvation and the
saturated vapor pressure. Table S1 shows the calculated solvent
association energies of ThTCAdesol crystals (ΔE, per ThTCA
molecule), which were estimated by the energy differences
between the host−guest complex ThTCA·(solvent)n (EHG) and
the sum of the isolated host ThTCA (EH) and solvent (EG) {ΔE
= −[EHG − (EH + EG)]}. The association energies ΔE for EtOH
(23.9 kcal mol−1) and 2-PrOH (23.2 kcal mol−1) were more
than 2 times larger than those which were not adsorbed to
ThTCAdesol (ΔE for AcOEt: 8.12 kcal mol−1). Sorption with
solvents in which single crystals could not be prepared did not
G
Cryst. Growth Des. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX