Crystal Growth & Design
Article
Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA). A TGA-55 equipment (TA
Instruments) was used for TGA with sample masses of approximately
5 mg. These analyses were performed to test and quantify any solvents
contained in the crystal forms. For all experiments, the powder
samples were placed in open aluminum oxide pans with the heating
rate of 10 °C/min, and dry nitrogen was employed as the purge gas at
40 mL/min.
Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC). DSC experiments
were conducted on a DSC 8500 instrument (PerkinElmer), and the
flow rate of dry nitrogen was 50 mL/min. The samples weighing 3−5
mg were placed and heated in hermetically sealed aluminum pans. For
all DSC experiments, the materials were heated from 30 °C to the
suitable temperature with a heating rate of 10 °C/min.
Dynamic Vapor Sorption (DVS). An Intrinsic DVS instrument
(Surface Measurement Systems, Ltd.) was used to measure the
process of water sorption and desorption. The powder samples were
placed on the balance, and the water sorption was measured over a
relative humidity (RH) range of 0−95%, and then decreased to 0%
RH for desorption at 25 °C. The next RH step with an interval of 5%
was performed if the mass change was less than 0.02% within 10 min.
Hot-Stage Microscopy (HSM). HSM experiments were carried
out on an SZ61TR polarizing microscope (Olympus) and an XPH-
300 hot stage equipped with a JVC TK-C9201 EC digital video
recorder from Shanghai Changfang Optical Instrument Co., Ltd.
HSM experiments were performed to figure out the transformations
of various forms during heating of the samples.
Chemical Stability Study. To avoid the effect of particle size on
the results, all forms of MSB were ground and sieved through the 100-
mesh sieves. The obtained powders with a uniform particle size were
used for the chemical stability test. Accurately weighed powders of 5
mg of MSB and 5 of mg sodium carbonate (n = 3) were evenly mixed
and placed at 25 °C and 45% RH. The resulting powders were
extracted with methanol and submitted to HPLC analysis after storing
at the intervals of 5, 10, 15, and 20 days. The sample concentrations
of MSB were determined by an Agilent 1260 series HPLC from
Agilent Technologies Co., Ltd., equipped with a quaternary pump
(G1311C), diode-array detector (G1315D) set to 230 nm, and a 4.6
× 50 mm, 1.8 μm Agilent Eclipse plus C18 column. The mobile phase
consisting of 5 mmol/L tetrabutylammonium bromide aqueous
solution (eluent A) and methanol (eluent B) was run at 1.0 mL/
min. The column temperature was set to 30 °C, and the injection
volume was 20 μL. The gradient elution procedure started at 70% A
and held for 2 min, and then linearly decreased to 10% A over 10 min
and held for 2 min, and finally returned to the initial composition and
held for 3 min.
form. However, no solid-state characterization or physico-
chemical properties of this hydrate were reported. Thus, it is
necessary to identify and comprehensively characterize the
various solid forms of MSB to select a superior form with great
chemical stability in formulation development.
The work presented here focuses on the effect of different
solid forms of MSB on its chemical stability. We disclose two
novel solid forms of MSB, including a new anhydrous form A
and a new 2.5 hydrate form (HB). Single crystal X-ray
diffraction (SCXRD) was conducted to elucidate the crystal
structures of these forms, and the physicochemical properties
of all solid forms were comprehensively investigated by powder
X-ray diffraction (PXRD), hot-stage microscopy (HSM),
thermal analysis (TGA and DSC), and dynamic vapor sorption
(DVS) isotherms. Moreover, the chemical stability of the
newly discovered forms (form A and HB) was evaluated and
compared with that of the marketed form (HA). Furthermore,
the underlying mechanism affecting MSB’s chemical stability
under various solid forms was discussed.
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
■
Materials. The sample of MSB with a purity greater than 98%
used in this work was purchased from Shanghai Aladdin Bio-Chem
Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The untreated sample was
proved by PXRD to be a single phase (HA). All analytical grade
solvents in the present study were purchased from Sinopharm
Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., and were used without further
purification.
Preparation of Form A. 10 mg of MSB was dissolved in 2 mL of
ethanol. The resulting solution was filtered through a 0.45 μm nylon
filter and placed at 50 °C for evaporation. After a few days, colorless
block crystals were harvested and submitted to X-ray diffraction
analysis.
Preparation of HA. 10 mg of MSB was dissolved in 2 mL of
acetone. The resulting solution was filtered through a 0.45 μm nylon
filter into a clean vial and placed at room temperature for evaporation.
After a few days, transparent rod-like crystal was obtained and
confirmed as HA, which is a dihydrate.
Preparation of HB. 20 mg of MSB was dissolved in 0.5 mL of a
1:1 (v/v) mixture of isopropanol and water. The resulting solution
was filtered through a 0.45 μm nylon filter into a 4 mL glass vial,
which was then placed in a large glass vial containing 5 mL of
isopropanol and sealed. After a week, thin sheet-like crystals were
obtained for crystal structure identification. The structure shows that
HB is a 2.5 hydrate.
Powder X-ray Diffraction (PXRD). PXRD patterns in this study
were obtained at constant or variable-temperature on a D8 Advance
(Bruker) X-ray diffractometer using Cu Kα radiation, with the voltage
and current of the generator being set to 40 kV and 40 mA,
respectively. The standard scanning range was 3−40° 2θ with a scan
rate of 0.1 s/step at ambient temperature. The collected data were
imaged and integrated with RINT Rapid, and peak analysis was
performed using MDI Jade software.
Single Crystal X-ray Diffraction (SCXRD). X-ray diffraction
collections of all single crystals of MSB were conducted on an APEX
II CCD diffractometer (Bruker) with Mo Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073
Å). Suitable crystals were mounted on loops, and the diffraction was
carried out at 170(0) K. The program SAINT was used for integrating
and scaling of intensity data, and the absorption effect of the data was
corrected using SADABS. The crystal structures were solved by the
direct methods on SHELXTL and subsequently refined by full-matrix
least-squares with SHELXL-2017 software. All non-hydrogen atoms
were refined with isotropic atomic displacement parameters, and all
hydrogen atoms were located in calculated positions and refined with
the riding model. Crystallographic data in cif format have been
deposited in the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center, CCDC
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
■
Preparation of Various Forms. In order to obtain as
many new solid forms as possible, different crystallization
methods were conducted in this study. Three solid forms,
anhydrous form A and two hydrates (HA and HB), were
obtained from the crystallization screening. Selected results of
crystallization experiments are listed in Table S1. Form A was
routinely obtained at room temperature in the slurry
experiments with organic solvents, but when the solvent
contains water, HA or HB can be obtained. Water activity
plays a crucial role in controlling the formation of different
hydrates. When the water content is low, such as 5% in acetone
or acetonitrile, HA is obtained. However, when the water
content rises, for instance, 10% in acetone or 15% in
acetonitrile, HB will be acquired (Table S1). In addition,
HA can be obtained by evaporating in some moderate polar
solvents at room temperature. However, at higher temperature,
the resulting powder was found to be form A. The solubility in
water of the three solid forms has been tested. The result
shows that the solubility in water of all three forms is greater
than 20 mg/mL. PXRD patterns of the three solid forms are
B
Cryst. Growth Des. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX