broadening and decrease in F (Fig. 4 and Table 1). The spectra
indicate that 2 has a nonpolar ground state and a significantly
higher dipole moment in the excited state, even though the two
constituent chromophores are identical. Similar behaviour is
observed for the 9,90-bianthryl molecule.5,15
photovoltaic devices; studies that exploit these properties are
currently underway in our laboratories.
We acknowledge financial support from the Center for
Advanced Molecular Photovoltaics (CAMP) (KUS-C1-015-21)
of the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
and Global Photonic Corporation. Femtosecond transient
absorption measurements were performed with support from
the Department of Energy’s Energy Frontier Research Center
program (Award: DE-SC0001011). STR acknowledges an ACC-F
fellowship from the National Science Foundation (CHE-0937015).
In cyclohexane, dyad 2 exhibits a simple first-order lumines-
cence decay (t = 9.3 ns). In contrast, a biexponential decay is
observed in CH2Cl2, comprised of a fast component (o200 ps)
accompanied by a longer-lived (ca. 7 ns) decay. Thus, excita-
tion of the S1 state in 2 leads to the population of a new
emissive state. In acetonitrile, we find that the nonradiative
decay rate of this new state (knr = 1.5 ꢁ 109 sꢀ1) is 20 times
slower than that of 1 in the same solvent (see ESI). Given how
the emission of 2 depends on solvent polarity, this new state
likely corresponds to an emissive ICT state populated by
solvent-induced symmetry breaking.5
Notes and references
1 S. R. Meech, A. J. Hoff and D. A. Wiersma, Chem. Phys. Lett.,
1985, 121, 287; D. J. Lockhart and S. G. Boxer, Biochemistry,
1987, 26, 664; E. J. P. Lathrop and R. A. Friesner, J. Phys. Chem.,
1994, 98, 3056; W. W. Parson, A. Scherz and A. Warshel, in
Antennas and Reaction Centers of Photosynthetic Bacteria,
ed. M. E. Michel-Beyerle, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985, p. 122.
2 W. Rettig, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1986, 25, 971.
3 Z. R. Grabowski, K. Rotkiewicz and W. Rettig, Chem. Rev., 2003,
103, 3899.
4 J. M. Giaimo, A. V. Gusev and M. R. Wasielewski, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2002, 124, 8530; J. M. Giaimo, J. V. Lockard, L. E. Sinks,
A. M. Scott, T. M. Wilson and M. R. Wasielewski, J. Phys. Chem.
A, 2008, 112, 2322.
5 F. Schneider and E. Lippert, Ber. Bunsen Ges. Phys. Chem., 1968,
72, 1155; F. Schneider and E. Lippert, Ber. Bunsen Ges. Phys.
Chem., 1970, 74, 624; F. C. Grozema, M. Swart, R. W. J. Zijlstra,
J. J. Piet, L. D. A. Siebbeles and P. T. van Duijnen, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2005, 127, 11019.
6 M. T. Whited, P. I. Djurovich, S. T. Roberts, A. C. Durrell,
C. W. Schlenker, S. E. Bradforth and M. E. Thompson, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 88.
Femtosecond transient absorption spectroscopy in acetonitrile
was used to further illuminate the charge-transfer behaviour of 2
in polar media. The S1 state observed upon excitation at 509 nm
ꢀ1
evolves within our experimental time resolution (kIC r 170 fs)
to produce an excited state that absorbs at 590 nm, consistent
with the formation of a BODIPY radical anion.11 However, the
spectral features associated with the ICT state of 2 persist an
order of magnitude longer (krꢀ1 = 650 ps, Fig. 3b) than those
of 1, relaxing with a rate that matches the emissive lifetime of 2
in acetonitrile (see ESI). We propose that steric congestion in
dyad 2 hinders rotation to a surface crossing region, thus
inhibiting nonradiative charge recombination.
Although several biacenes display similar luminescent
properties,2 to the best of our knowledge 2 represents the first
example of a dyad that combines symmetry-breaking formation
of an emissive ICT state with intense absorption in the visible
region of the spectrum. While porphyrins are in many respects
related to dipyrrins, the meso-linked porphyrin analogues of 2
do not undergo symmetry-breaking ICT because formation of
such an excited state is endothermic with respect to the S1
state.16 BODIPY dyads directly linked at the a- or b positions
also do not exhibit this sort of emissive behaviour.17 However,
Benniston et al. have reported a hybrid of 2 and 9,90-bianthryl,
a meso-linked 9-anthracenyl–BODIPY compound, that readily
forms an emissive ICT state in polar solvents.18
7 A. Coskun and E. U. Akkaya, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005,
127, 10464.
8 W. W. Qin, M. Baruah, M. Van der Auweraer, F. C. De Schryver
and N. Boens, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2005, 109, 7371.
¨
9 M. Zander and W. Rettig, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1984, 110, 602.
10 C. Reichardt, Chem. Rev., 1994, 94, 2319.
11 S. Hattori, K. Ohkubo, Y. Urano, H. Sunahara, T. Nagano,
Y. Wada, N. V. Tkachenko, H. Lemmetyinen and S. Fukuzumi,
J. Phys. Chem. B, 2005, 109, 15368.
12 H. L. Kee, C. Kirmaier, L. H. Yu, P. Thamyongkit,
W. J. Youngblood, M. E. Calder, L. Ramos, B. C. Noll,
D. F. Bocian, W. R. Scheidt, R. R. Birge, J. S. Lindsey and
D. Holten, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2005, 109, 20433.
13 A. Loudet and K. Burgess, Chem. Rev., 2007, 107, 4891; G. Ulrich,
R. Ziessel and A. Harriman, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008,
47, 1184.
In conclusion, excitation of BODIPY dyads 1 and 2 leads to
formation of ICT states in polar media by solvent-induced
symmetry breaking. The further presence of strong absorption
at visible wavelengths enables these molecules to mimic features
seen in the photosynthetic reaction center. Model systems that
possess both these characteristics are rare.4 Differing degrees of
rotational freedom in the dyads significantly alter the behavior
of the ICT state. Whereas dyad 1 undergoes rapid nonradiative
decay to the ground state, the more hindered dyad 2 has a long-
lived ICT state with moderate-to-high fluorescence quantum
efficiency. The excited state properties of the dyads reported
here could prove useful in facilitating charge separation in
14 A. C. Benniston, G. Copley, A. Harriman, D. Howgego,
R. W. Harrington and W. Clegg, J. Org. Chem., 2010, 75, 2018;
S. G. Telfer, T. M. McLean and M. R. Waterland, Dalton Trans.,
2011, 40, 3097.
15 N. Nakashima, M. Murakawa and N. Mataga, Bull. Chem. Soc.
Jpn., 1976, 49, 854.
16 A. Osuka and H. Shimidzu, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1997,
36, 135.
17 M. Broring, R. Kruger, S. Link, C. Kleeberg, S. Kohler, X. Xie,
B. Ventura and L. Flamigni, Chem.–Eur. J., 2008, 14, 2976;
S. Rihn, M. Erdem, A. De Nicola, P. Retailleau and R. Ziessel,
Org. Lett., 2011, 13, 1916.
18 A. C. Benniston, A. Harriman, V. L. Whittle, M. Zelzer,
R. W. Harrington and W. Clegg, Photochem. Photobiol. Sci.,
2010, 9, 1009.
c
286 Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 284–286
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012