5816
M. D. Oberlander and J. M. Parson: Reactions of Ca and Sr with water and alcohols
*
state SrOH product resulting from the Sr –water reaction.
Neglecting any trends which may be due to the identity of
the metal, this difference could be due to energy disposal
into other vibrational modes of the metal alkoxide product or
the assumed Ca–OCH3 bond energy may be overestimated.
Late energy release could also explain a cold internal state
distribution, but this implies backward scattering in the prod-
uct angular distribution, which was not observed in the work
of Davis et al.14 on reaction of Ba(1D) with methanol. It
therefore seems that the internal state distribution of the
alkoxide products have some features in common with the
MOH vibrational distribution produced in the water reaction.
The low degree of metal-stretching mode excitation is ex-
pected, and the narrow distribution of bending mode excita-
tion can be explained kinematically, or in terms of inefficient
energy redistribution in the HMOR͑H͒ intermediate.
6 J. A. Coxon, M. Li, and P. I. Presunka, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 150, 33 ͑1991͒.
7 J. A. Coxon, M. Li, and P. I. Presunka, Mol. Phys. 76, 1463 ͑1992͒.
8 M. Li and J. A. Coxon, J. Chem. Phys. 97, 8961 ͑1992͒.
9 J. A. Coxon, M. Li, and P. I. Presunka, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 164, 118 ͑1994͒.
10 J. Nakagawa, R. F. Wormsbecher, and D. O. Harris, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 97,
37 ͑1983͒.
11 P. I. Presunka and J. A. Coxon, Can. J. Chem. 71, 1689 ͑1993͒; P. I.
Presunka and J. A. Coxon ͑unpublished͒.
12 P. I. Presunka and J. A. Coxon, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 201 ͑1994͒.
13 M. D. Oberlander, R. P. Kampf, and J. M. Parson, Chem. Phys. Lett. 176,
385 ͑1991͒.
14 H. F. Davis, A. G. Suits, Y. T. Lee, C. Alcaraz, and J. M. Mestadagh, J.
Chem. Phys. 98, 9595 ͑1993͒.
15 M. A. Douglas, R. H. Hauge, and J. L. Margrave, High Temp. Sci. 17, 201
͑1984͒; J. W. Kauffman, R. H. Hauge, and J. L. Margrave, High Temp.
Sci. 18, 97 ͑1984͒.
16 P. de Pujo, O. Sublemontier, J. P. Visticot, J. Berlande, J. Cuvellier, C.
Alcaraz, T. Gustavsson, J. M. Mestdagh, and P. Meynadier, J. Chem.
Phys. 99, 2533 ͑1993͒.
M. Esteban, M. Garay, J. M. Garcıa-Tijero, E. Verdasco, and A. Gonzalez
17
´
´
We find no indication that metal hydroxide is a signifi-
cant ground state product in the reaction of either Ca(3P0) or
Sr(3P0) with methanol. The observations of Esteban et al.17
indicate that Ca(1D2) reaction with methanol is highly selec-
˜
Urena, Chem. Phys. Lett. 230, 525 ͑1994͒; J. M. Mestdagh, J. P. Visticot,
´
˜
and P. F. Bernath, ibid. 237, 568 ͑1995͒; A. Gonzalez Urena and M.
Garay, ibid. 237, 570 ͑1995͒.
18 S. A. Mitchell, M. A. Blitz, P. E. M. Siegbahn, and M. Svensson, J. Chem.
Phys. 100, 423 ͑1994͒.
*
tive insofar as this reaction is reported to lead only to CaOH
19 S. Sakai, J. Phys. Chem. 97, 8917 ͑1993͒.
20 K. Liu and J. M. Parson, J. Chem. Phys. 67, 1814 ͑1977͒.
21 M. D. Oberlander, Ph.D. dissertation, The Ohio State University, 1995.
22 M. W. Chase, C. A. Davies, J. R. Downey, D. J. Frurip, R. A. McDonald,
and A. N. Syverud, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 14, Suppl. No. 1 ͑1985͒.
23 R. F. Wormsbecher and R. D. Suenram, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 95, 391 ͑1982͒.
24 B. S. Cheong, Ph.D. dissertation, The Ohio State University, 1993.
25 P. J. Dagdigian, H. W. Cruse, A. Schultz, and R. N. Zare, J. Chem. Phys.
61, 4450 ͑1974͒.
emission, albeit with a very small reaction cross section. It is
clear that additional work is necessary to establish the energy
of the M–OCH3 bond ͑MϭCa,Sr,Ba͒. Based on the vibra-
tional assignments presented in Fig. 1, the present work im-
plies a crude Ca–OCH3 bond energy of at least approxi-
˜
mately 2.85 eV, which is insufficiently large to yield A state
chemiluminescence in the Ca(1D2)–methanol reaction. The
bond energy estimate assumes Ca(3P2) is the reactant and
neglects contribution from ͑Љ ϭ 488 cmϪ1͒ and other
26 T. E. Sharp and H. M. Rosenstock, J. Chem. Phys. 41, 3453 ͑1964͒.
27 E. B. Wilson, J. C. Decius, and P. C. Cross, Molecular Vibrations
͑McGraw-Hill, New York, 1995͒.
4
4
28 L. Pauling and E. B. Wilson, Jr., Introduction to Quantum Mechanics
͑McGraw-Hill, New York, 1935͒, pp. 105–111.
modes whose extent of excitation is difficult to determine
due to the limited spectral resolution observed in Fig. 1. If
there are thermochemically accessible channels leading to
29 G. Herzberg, Molecular Spectra and Molecular Structure, Vol. I, Spectra
of Diatomic Molecules ͑Van Nostrand, New York, 1950͒.
30 G. Herzberg, Molecular Spectra and Molecular Structure, Vol. III, Elec-
tronic Spectra and Electronic Structure of Polyatomic Molecules ͑Kreiger,
Malabar, 1991͒.
*
CaOCH3 , whose electronic transitions have been demon-
strated to lie in the same spectral region as the corresponding
transitions of CaOH, then higher resolution chemilumines-
cence experiments are required to address the possibility of
31 R. S. Mulliken, Rev. Mod. Phys. 3, 89 ͑1931͒.
32 G. Herzberg, The Spectra and Structure of Simple Free Radicals ͑Cornell
University, Ithaca, 1971͒.
formation of electonically excited CaOCH3 in the
1
*
Ca( D2)-methanol reaction. The Sr –methanol system may
33 P. R. Lide, Jr., and C. Matsumura, J. Chem. Phys. 50, 3080 ͑1969͒.
34 R. D. Levine and J. L. Kinsey, Information-Theoretic Approach: Applica-
tion to Molecular Collisions, in Atom-Molecule Collision Theory, edited
by R. B. Bernstein ͑Plenum, New York, 1979͒.
be better suited for such a study based on the substantial
˜ ˜
spectral shift observed for the B–X transition of SrOCH3
35 R. B. Bernstein and R. D. Levine, Adv. At. Mol. Phys. 11, 216 ͑1975͒.
36 P. R. Bevington, Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical
Sciences ͑McGraw-Hill, New York, 1969͒; W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky,
W. T. Vetterling and B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes in Fortran. The
Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd ed. ͑Cambridge University, New York,
1992͒.
relative to that of SrOH.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Support of the National Science Foundation is gratefully
acknowledged. The authors would also like to thank Dr. Pre-
sunka and Professor Coxon for furnishing unpublished spec-
troscopic results.
37 C. N. Jarman and P. F. Bernath, 47th Ohio State University International
Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy, June 1992, Abstract TB06.
38 L. J. deKoning and N. M. M. Nibbering, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 106, 7971
͑1984͒.
39 W. J. Griffiths and F. M. Harris, Org. Mass. Spectrom. 22, 559 ͑1987͒.
1 B. S. Cheong and J. M. Parson, J. Chem. Phys. 100, 2637 ͑1994͒.
2 H. W. Cruse, P. J. Dagdigian, and R. N. Zare, Faraday Disc. Chem. Soc.
55, 277 ͑1973͒.
40
¨
H. J. Werner, U. Manz, and P. Rosmus, J. Chem. Phys. 87, 2913 ͑1987͒.
41 R. F. W. Bader, Can. J. Chem. 40, 1164 ͑1962͒.
42 R. G. Pearson, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 91, 1252 ͑1969͒.
43 K. Liu and J.M. Parson, J. Chem. Phys. 68, 1794 ͑1978͒.
44 D. Mathur, C. Badrinathan, and V. R. Marathe, Org. Mass. Spectrom. 24,
625 ͑1989͒.
3 R. C. Hilborn, Z. Qingshi, and D. O. Harris, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 97, 73
͑1983͒; J. M. Mestdagh and J. P. Visticot, Chem. Phys. 155, 79 ͑1991͒.
4 P. F. Bernath and S. Kinsey-Nielsen, Chem. Phys. Lett. 105, 663 ͑1984͒.
5 P. F. Bernath and C. R. Brazier, Astrophys. J. 288, 373 ͑1985͒.
J. Chem. Phys., Vol. 105, No. 14, 8 October 1996
130.89.98.137 On: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 18:43:19