NO. The decomposition of RSNOs is dependent on various factors,
such as intensity of light, solution pH, metal ion concentration,
and the presence of various reductants (e.g., ascorbate and
thiols).17-22 In aqueous solution, exposure to visible light or certain
metal ions leads to the rapid decomposition of RSNOs. Williams
et al. reported that RSNOs can undergo a Cu(II)-catalyzed reaction
involving reduction of Cu(II) to Cu(I) by thiolate impurities or
added reducing agents and subsequent reduction of the RSNO
to RS- and NO by the Cu(I) species.17,23-25 Thiolate formed from
this reaction can reduce the Cu(II) species also formed, regen-
erating Cu(I), yielding a catalytic cycle. Even a trace level of Cu(II)
ions can greatly facilitate this reaction, including copper ions
bound to peptides or proteins.26 The reduction of Cu(II) to Cu(I)
is a crucial first step for such decomposition, and the subsequent
formation of a Cu(I) intermediate complex (five- or six-membered
ring structures) with the RSNO species is also postulated to be
involved in the decomposition mechanism.23 The reaction of
RSNOs via this pathway can be completely suppressed by adding
a multidentate Cu(II) chelator such as EDTA to the solution.17,23
To detect RSNOs in biological systems, a variety of methods
have been suggested. Most techniques depend on redox or
substitution reactions of RSNOs to produce detectable products
including other forms of nitrogen oxides (NO, NO2-, NO3-). These
species can be monitored via either spectrophotometric or
fluorometric assays, as well as chemiluminescence or electro-
chemical methods.19,27,28 The rate and extent of these reactions
are dependent on reaction conditions (e.g., pH), as well as the
specific nature of the R group of the RSNO species.19,25,29 In
addition, the presence of interfering compounds often found in
biological fluids can influence the accuracy in assaying the given
RSNO species.19,28,30 Therefore, separation steps, such as electro-
phoresis and HPLC, are frequently combined to avoid possible
influence/interference from nitrite and other species (disulfides,
thiols, or antioxidants) or proteins during analytical detection.27
While current analytical methods provide good sensitivity, the
intrinsic lability of RSNOs makes sample pretreatment steps
difficult to implement.27,31,32 Hence, the development of simple and
reliable RSNO detection methods is still of great interest.
Figure 1. Amperometric detection scheme based on catalytic
copper species within the outer polymeric layer of proposed RSNO
sensor.
Recent research in this laboratory has demonstrated the
possibility of preparing more thromboresistive coatings by incor-
porating Cu(II) sites within polymeric films.33,34 When in contact
with fresh blood, endogenous RSNO species in the blood can be
catalytically converted to NO via the Cu(II)/Cu(I) redox chemistry
described above, creating a locally elevated level of NO at the
polymer/blood interface. The improved biocompatibility of the
films is due to the potent inhibitory effect of NO on platelet
activation and adhesion.35 However, to use such polymers to
enhance the blood compatibility of biomedical devices in clinical
practice, it will be necessary to prove whether blood levels of
endogenous reactive RSNO species do not vary greatly from
subject to subject.
Herein we propose the concept of a direct and real-time RSNO
sensor by combining the catalytic NO-generating capability of
polymer films containing copper species with a highly sensitive
amperometric NO sensor described previously.36,37 While elec-
trochemical RSNO detection using commercially available am-
perometric NO probes has been suggested,19 RSNO measure-
ments in this earlier work were accomplished by triggering
solution-phase RSNO decomposition by adding Cu(II) ions and
thiols as reagents to the bulk sample solution.19 In the present
work, various catalytic polymeric films containing copper species
are used to modify the surface of the amperometric NO detector,
thereby creating true sensors that respond reversibly to the levels
of RSNO species in test samples. As illustrated schematically in
Figure 1, the Cu(II)-mediated decomposition of RSNOs is achieved
within a thin hydrophilic polymer layer (polyurethane (PU)) at
the distal tip of the improved NO sensor, leading to the production
of NO in this confined region. The NO generated can diffuse
through the gas-permeable membrane of the NO sensor to a
planar platinized platinum anode, where oxidation of NO takes
place. Three different catalytic layers are examined to prepare
RSNO sensors including a lipophilic Cu(II)-ligand complex, a
relatively insoluble copper-phosphate salt, and small (3-µm)
(17) Askew, S. C.; Barnett, D. J.; McAninly, J.; Williams, D. L. H. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 2 1995, 741-745.
(18) Oae, S.; Fukushima, D.; Kim, Y. H. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1977,
407b-408.
(19) Pfeiffer, S.; Schrammel, A.; Schmidt, K.; Mayer, B. Anal. Biochem. 1998,
258, 68-73.
(20) Singh, S. P.; Wishnok, J. S.; Keshive, M.; Deen, W. M.; Tannenbaum, S. R.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1996, 93, 14434-14439.
(21) Scorza, G.; Pietraforte, D.; Minetti, M. Free Radical Biol. Med. 1996, 22,
633-642.
(22) Shishido, S. M.; Oliveira, M. G. d. Photochem. Photobiol. 2000, 71, 273-
280.
(23) Williams, D. L. H. Acc. Chem. Res. 1999, 32, 869-876.
(24) Holmes, A. J.; Williams, D. L. H. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1998,
1711-1712.
(25) Dicks, A. P.; Swift, H. R.; Williams, D. L. H.; Butler, A. R.; Al-Sa’doni, H.
H.; Cox, B. G. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1996, 481-487.
(26) Dicks, A. P.; Williams, D. L. H. Chem. Biol. 1996, 3, 655-659.
(27) Stamler, J. S.; Feelisch, M. In Methods in Nitric Oxide Research; Feelisch,
M., Stamler, J. S., Eds.; John Wiley: Chichester, U.K., 1996; pp 521-539.
(28) Cook, J. A.; Kim, S. Y.; Teague, D.; Krishna, M. C.; Pacelli, R.; Mitchell, J.
B.; Vodovotz, Y.; Nims, R. W.; Christodoulou, D.; Miles, A. M. Anal. Biochem.
1996, 238, 150-158.
(31) Alpert, C.; Ramdev, N.; George, D.; Loscalzo, J. Anal. Biochem. 1997, 245,
1-7.
(32) Tashimo, O.; Ishibashi, T.; Yoshida, J.; Tsuchida, H.; Nishio, M. Nitric Oxide
2003, 9, 148-152.
(33) Oh, B. K.; Meyerhoff, M. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 9552-9553.
(34) Oh, B. K.; Meyerhoff, M. E. Biomaterials 2004, 25, 283-293.
(35) Radomski, M.; Palmer, R.; Moncada, S. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1987, 92, 639-
646.
(29) Wood, P. D.; Mutus, B.; Redmond, R. W. Photochem. Photobiol. 1996, 64,
518-524.
(30) Tsikas, D. Nitric Oxide 2003, 9, 53-55.
(36) Lee, Y.; Oh, B. K.; Meyerhoff, M. E. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76, 536-544.
(37) Lee, Y.; Yang, J.; Rudich, S. M.; Schreiner, R. J.; Meyerhoff, M. E. Anal.
Chem. 2004, 76, 545-551.
Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 77, No. 11, June 1, 2005 3517