362
S.Z. Sullivan et al. / Chemical Physics Letters 498 (2010) 359–365
more sterically hindered and results in less or almost no
aggregation.
result, the intensity of the transition within the ms = 3/2 doublet
observed at g = 5.89 shows significant intensity. As discussed
previously, it was not possible to observe the axial ligand as sug-
gested for the complex 2. However based on the EPR signals with
g-anisotropy and E/D-strain of the complex 2 and observing the
similarity of the EPR signal of previously reported similar com-
plexes [19], the existence of the axial ligand(s) in the complex 2
can be surmised.
Upon correction of the observed signals for Curie-law depen-
dence, the observed signal intensity of these transitions is inversely
correlated as a function of temperature. Thus the intensity of the
g = 5.89 signal is greatest at lower temperature whereas the signal
observed at g = 4.67 increases with temperature. The assignment of
these features are further corroborated by fitting the temperature-
normalized signal intensity to a Boltzman population distribution
for a 2-level system; Figure 5A(s), (solid line). From the best-fit
to each transition, the value for the axial-zero field splitting term
(D) for 2a was determined to be D = ꢀ1.9 0.2 cmꢀ1. Thus the
ms = 3/2 doublet represents the ground state of the 2a S = 3/2
spin-system.
Species 2b represents a minority fraction of EPR spectra I repre-
senting only 14% of the total S = 3/2 species. This component shows
considerably less g-anisotropy and a more axial magnetic symme-
try, E/D-value of 0.07. Given the low concentration of this species it
could easily be overlooked. However, the sharp spectral features
observed in spectra I at g = 4.35 and 1.99 cannot be simulated
within SI while simultaneously maintaining the features associ-
ated with 2a at g = 5.89 and 4.67. As observed in Figure 3, the signal
intensity observed at g = 1.99 is largely dominated by species 2b,
and very little intensity originates from 2a due to its broad features
within this region of the spectrum. Conversely, the signal intensity
observed at g = 4.67 (and 5.89) is nearly completely attributed to
species 2a. As illustrated by Figure 5A, the temperature depen-
dence of the feature at g = 1.99 associated with 2b is significantly
different than that observed at g = 4.67 for 2a. Since there are only
two doublet within a S = 3/2 spin-system, these two spectroscopic
features cannot be attributed to the same S = 3/2 species. As illus-
trated in Figure 5A(d), (dashed line), the same procedure outlined
for 2a can be used to determine the D-value for 2b;
D = ꢀ3.6 0.3 cmꢀ1. While the magnitude of the 2b D-value is sig-
nificantly larger than that of 2a, both species have a ground state
ms = 3/2 doublet.
By altering the solvent composition from pure ACN to a 1:1
mixture of toluene/ethanol nearly all indications of molecular
aggregation (as observed by EPR spectroscopy) were eliminated. As
illustrated in Figure 4 the 10 K EPR spectra (solid line, I) of complex
2 (in 1:1 toluene/EtOH) shows signals consistent with a ferric-iron
in an intermediate axial-ligand field, S = 3/2 [26,27]. Based on the
effect of the solvent on the EPR spectra it is possible that EtOH is
acting as an axial ligand to the Fe-tetraamido macrocyclic ligand
complex. This could potentially decrease molecular aggregation
via a bridging water or hydroxide ligand.
The temperature dependence, microwave power saturation
behavior, and spectral features associated with spectra I can only
be understood if the observed EPR spectra is fit to two spectroscop-
ically distinct S = 3/2 species, termed 2a and 2b henceforth. A
quantitative component sum simulation (dashed line, S1) for the
spectra associated with species 2a and 2b was utilized to generate
the simulation SI for complex 2. Species 2a is the dominate compo-
nent of EPR spectra I representing 86% of the total S = 3/2 species
observed by EPR spectroscopy. The signals observed at g-values
of 4.67, 4.18, and 1.88 originate from a transition within the
ms = 1/2 doublet of the S = 3/2 spin-system with an E/D-value of
0.15. Similar signals have been previously observed in Fe-tetraam-
ido macrocyclic ligand complexes with one axial water ligand and
one axial hydroxide ligand [19].
The EPR line-width of 2b is dominated by g-anisotropy and E/D-
strain which is consistent with other ferric-tetraamido macrocyclic
ligand complexes [19]. The increased rhombicity of this species al-
lows for significant mixing of the ms = 1/2 and 3/2-eigenstates. As a
The microwave power saturation behavior of 2a and 2b was
determined at 10 K as a final confirmation for the presence of
two species. As with the temperature dependence, the signal inten-
sity as a function of microwave power shown in Figure 5B was
measured at g ꢁ 4.67 for 1a and g = 1.99 for 2b. The half-saturation
microwave power (P1/2) for species 2a and 2b was determined by
least-squares fit to Eq. (1) [28,29].
ꢀ
ꢁ
ꢀ
ꢁ
pffiffiffi
log I=
P
¼ log I0 ꢀ b=2 ꢂ log 1 þ p=p1=2
:
ð1Þ
Within this temperature regime the line-width of 2a and 2b are
not significantly broadened as a function of temperature and thus
both species exhibit inhomogeneous saturation behavior (b = 1)
and are best-fit to a P1/2-value of 85 10 and 40 5 mW, respec-
tively. Given the additional spectral feature observed at g = 5.89
for 2b and the differential temperature dependence and micro-
wave saturation behavior observed at g = 4.67 and g = 1.99, the ob-
served EPR spectra I can be quantitatively simulated using two
spectroscopically distinct S = 3/2 species, 2a and 2b.
The S = 3/2 spin-state observed for 2a and 2b is consistent with
the magnetic moment (leff = 3.87 Bohr Magneton) determined by
the Gouy method. This value for the spin-only magnetic moment
is consistent with three unpaired electrons, S = 3/2. Furthermore,
as stated in the Section 2, the concentration of each species was
Figure 4. X-band EPR spectra (solid line) of 1.0 mM complex 2 at 10 K in 1:1
(toluene:EtOH). A component simulation for the spectra associated with species 2a
and 2b was utilized to generate the simulation (dashed line, SI). Using this
technique, the relative concentration for species 2a and 2b was determined by
least-squares analysis to be 86% mM and 14%, respectively. Instrumental
parameters: microwave frequency, 9.64 GHz; microwave power, 0.63 mW;
modulation amplitude, 0.92 mT; temperature, 10 K. Simulation parameters: (2a)
S = 3/2; gxyz = 2.28 1.95, 2.01;
r
gxyz = 0.03; D = ꢀ1.90 cmꢀ1 D = 0.04 cmꢀ1; E/D =
; r
0.15;
E/D = 0.07;
r
E/D = 0.05;
r
B = 1.5 mT; (2b) S = 3/2; gxyz = 2.11, 2.00, 2.02; D = ꢀ3.60 cmꢀ1
;
r
gxyz = 0.02, 0.03, 0.004; r ; rE/D = 0.02; rB = 1.5 mT.
D = 0.6 cmꢀ1