Synthesis of Palladium Nanobars and Nanorods
A R T I C L E S
shows a high-resolution TEM image of a nanorod that lies on
the TEM grid against the (010) face. The ends of this nanorod
were enclosed by the (001) face and {110} facets of relatively
small in area. These results are similar to the experimental
observations on single-crystal Au nanorods.11 We also observed
surface reconstruction for the less stable {110} facets, which
has a higher surface energy relative to the {100} and {111}
facets. In some regions, rows of atoms are missing along the
[11h0] axis, and the {110} surface was transformed into strips
of {111} facets. It is known that the {111} surface has a most
closely packed structure, and thus the lowest surface energy.
Through this surface reconstruction, the {110} facets were
stabilized on the Pd nanorods. A similar surface reconstruction
has also been observed for single-crystal Au nanorods.11c In
addition to the high-resolution TEM, the nanorods and nanobars
can also be easily distinguished by the sharpness of their ends,
with bars, in general, sharper than rods.
Oxidative etching has been extensively explored by our group
and others for the shape-controlled synthesis of metal nano-
structures. It can be used to slow a reduction process, selectively
remove multiply twinned seeds, generate hollow Pd nanostruc-
tures, or shorten single-crystal Au nanorods.9,10,17 Yet it can play
another role in the formation of highly anisotropic nanostruc-
tures. In the present synthesis, addition of bromide at a
sufficiently high concentration could cover the surface of a Pd
nanocrystal with bromide due to its strong binding to the Pd
surface.18 The chemisorbed bromide layer prevents further
addition of Pd atoms from solution to the nanocrystal surface,
so one has to activate the surface of this nanocrystal to continue
the growth. Oxidative etching, which is caused by oxygen (from
air) and chloride (from PdCl42-), could remove some of the
bromide from the surface and thus expose sites for addition of
Pd atoms. In the current case, the bromide layer would make it
difficult to perform oxidative etching over the entire surface.
However, with the assistance of water, oxidative etching was
able to occur locally on a specific face of a cubic nanocrystal.19
We have previously observed that corrosion of Pd nanocubes,
whose surface was protected by a high concentration of PVP,
occurs from only one side by a pitting process, even though all
sides are equivalent {100} facets.17b In the galvanic replacement
between Ag nanocubes and HAuCl4 in water, it was also
observed that etched pits were only formed at one of the six
{100} faces.20 Other groups have also reported that oxidative
etching can selectively take place on {100} tips of single-crystal
Au nanorods, although there are other {100} faces on the side
surface.17c This localized oxidative etching makes one face
become more active than others and thus provides favorable
sites for the addition of Pd atoms. When sufficient Pd atoms
are added to the etched sites, atomic addition will be faster than
the dissolution of atoms caused by etching. We believe that it
is the preferential growth at these active sites that breaks the
cubic symmetry of a Pd nanocrystal and leads to the formation
of Pd nanorods and nanobars.
The phase purity and high crystallinity of the Pd nanostruc-
tures are also supported by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD).
Figure S2 shows the typical PXRD pattern of an as-prepared
sample of Pd nanobars. In the XRD pattern, all of the peaks
can be indexed to fcc palladium (JCPDS card, 05-0681). No
characteristic peaks were observed for impurities such as PdBr2
and PdO. The ratio between the intensities of (111) and (200)
peaks is much lower than the value reported for the conventional
powder sample (1.33 versus 2.38), indicating that the diffraction
from {100} planes is enhanced for the sample of Pd nanobars.
It is likely that the nanobars preferentially lay on the substrate
against their flat {100} facets. As a result, there was a texturing
effect. The ED pattern (inset of Figure S2) taken from an
assembly of Pd nanobars also indicates that they were highly
crystalline. The concentric rings can be indexed to the diffraction
from {111}, {200}, {220}, and {311} planes of fcc palladium,
respectively.
Oxidative Etching and Its Role in the Anisotropic Growth
of Pd Nanostructures. What is the driving force for the
anisotropic growth of Pd nanobars and nanorods in the current
work? Two mechanisms have been proposed to account for the
anisotropic growth of a crystal in the solution phase when no
template is involved. In the first mechanism, the solid materials
are characterized by a highly anisotropic crystallographic
structure, and they naturally grow into nanorods and nanowires.
Typical examples include trigonal Se and Te, as well as wu¨rtzite
CdS and CdSe.15 The second mechanism involves twin or
stacking faults, which has been observed for both 5-fold twinned
nanorods and 2-fold twinned nanobeams of fcc metals.16 The
twin planes can generate re-entrant grooves, favorable sites for
the addition of atoms.16c The absence of an anisotropic crystal
structure or twin defects in both Pd nanobars and nanorods led
us to propose a third mechanism, in which localized oxidative
etching plays the pivotal role to induce anisotropic growth in a
short period of time.
This argument is supported by the experiments with different
degrees of etching. Figure 3A shows a TEM image of the
product obtained from a synthesis that was protected by
continuous Ar flow. The resultant nanorods exhibited a decrease
in aspect ratio as compared to the product prepared in air
because oxidative etching was partially blocked due to the
reduced level of air in the solution. However, because oxygen
binds strongly to Pd surface, it is impossible to completely block
oxidative etching in a Pd synthesis by simply bubbling an inert
gas through the reaction solution. Most recently, we demon-
strated that addition of citric acid was able to efficiently block
oxidative etching.21 Following this strategy, we added citric acid
to the current synthesis, and the product was found to contain
(17) (a) Xiong, Y.; Chen, J.; Wiley, B.; Xia, Y.; Yin, Y.; Li, Z.-Y. Nano Lett.
2005, 5, 1237. (b) Xiong, Y.; Wiley, B.; Chen, J.; Li, Z.-Y.; Yin, Y.; Xia,
Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 7913. (c) Tsung, C.-K.; Kou, X.; Shi,
Q.; Zhang, J.; Yeung, M. H.; Wang, J.; Stucky, G. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2006, 128, 5352.
(15) (a) Peng, X.; Manna, L.; Yang, W.; Wickham, J.; Scher, E.; Kadavanich,
A.; Alivisatos, A. P. Nature 2000, 404, 59. (b) Peng, X. Chem.-Eur. J.
2002, 8, 334. (c) Xia, Y.; Yang, P.; Sun, Y.; Wu, Y.; Mayers, B.; Gates,
B.; Yin, Y.; Kim, F.; Yan, H. AdV. Mater. 2003, 15, 353. (d) Peng, X.
AdV. Mater. 2003, 15, 459.
(16) (a) Germain, V.; Li, J.; Ingert, D.; Wang, Z. L.; Pileni, M. P. J. Phys.
Chem. B 2003, 107, 8717. (b) Sun, Y.; Mayers, B.; Herricks, T.; Xia, Y.
Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 955. (c) Lofton, C.; Sigmund, W. AdV. Funct. Mater.
2005, 15, 1197. (d) Wiley, B. J.; Wang, Z.; Wei, J.; Yin, Y.; Cobden, D.
H.; Xia, Y. Nano Lett. 2006, 6, 2273. (e) Elechiguerra, J. L.; Reyes-Gasga,
J.; Yacaman, M. J. J. Mater. Chem. 2006, 16, 3906.
(18) (a) Schimpf, J. A.; Abreu, J. B.; Soriaga, M. P. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1994,
364, 247. (b) Carrasquillo, A.; Jeng, J.-J., Jr.; Barriga, R. J.; Temesghen,
W. F.; Soriaga, M. P. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1997, 255, 249. (c) Lucas, C. A.;
Markovic´, N. M.; Ross, P. N. Phys. ReV. B 1997, 55, 7964. (d) Zou, S.;
Gao, X.; Weaver, M. J. Surf. Sci. 2000, 452, 44.
(19) (a) Newman, R. C.; Sieradzki, K. Science 1994, 263, 1708. (b) Scully, J.
C. The Fundamentals of Corrosion, 3rd ed.; Pergamon Press: Oxford, New
York, 1990; pp 1-57.
(20) Sun, Y.; Xia, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 3892.
(21) Xiong, Y.; McLellan, J. M.; Yin, Y.; Xia, Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007,
46, 790.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 129, NO. 12, 2007 3669