D. Teschner et al. / Journal of Catalysis 285 (2012) 273–284
281
Cl
2
response is related to favored chlorine evolution. This may be
3.7. Micro-kinetic modeling
tentatively attributed to both the active-phase morphology and
structure sensitivity of the reaction. As shown by HRTEM, the sup-
From the reaction energy profiles shown in Fig. 4 and the
corresponding partition functions, we have evaluated several exper-
imentalparameters discussed in above sections. In the micro-kinetic
(MK) models, a minimum of 12 elementary steps (Eqs. (2)–(7), plus
the reverse reactions) and the site balance have been taken into ac-
count for each of the studied surfaces (110), (101), and (100). With
the MK model, it is possible to self-consistently obtain the popula-
ported catalyst is constituted by a thin coat of few RuO
2
layers epi-
taxially grown onto the SnO carrier accompanied by small RuO
2
2
nanoparticles, both preferentially exposing {110} and {011} crystal
facets. This description applies also to the binder-containing cata-
lyst, as the presence of alumina has been shown not to affect the
morphology of RuO
steps of the reaction mechanism already reported for RuO
14,16] and extended above to different surface facets predicts a
2
/SnO
2
[19]. DFT analysis of the elementary
2
(110)
2 2
tions of intermediates (O , O, Cl, OH, H O) at the surface and the reac-
ꢀ1
[
tivity as either reaction rate or turnover frequency, TOFCl2 in s , at a
given time.
higher activity in HCl oxidation for the (110) and (011) planes over
the (100) plane. Further, the calculations on mono-/bilayers of
As benchmark, we have calculated the TOF for the RuO
and (100) surfaces, at the conditions reported by Over et al. [40]
(p(O ) = 0.5 mbar, p(HCl) = 2 mbar, T = 650 K), considering the con-
version after 2 h as in their experiments. The calculated value on
2
(110)
RuO
tive than the unsupported RuO
tatively related to a less effective self-poisoning of RuO
2
on SnO
2
indicate that the supported RuO
(Fig. 4). The latter outcome is ten-
by chlorine
2
bilayer is more ac-
2
2
2
ꢀ1
in view of the geometric effect caused by epitaxy, which relates well
to the easier chlorine evolution evidenced in the TAP data. The
similar transients obtained for equilibrated RuO /SnO (Fig. 7a–c)
2 2
seem to indicate that the main mechanistic features are retained,
and in spite of the strong morphological changes, this material
underwent upon use, leading to the formation of larger nanoparti-
2
RuO (110) using the formula in their work is 0.61 s , while the
ꢀ1
experimental estimate is 0.6 s . The agreement found between
our MK results and the low-pressure experimental value is, thus,
particularly remarkable, and gives a strong support to the validity
of the present approach. Low-pressure experiments were also car-
ried out for the (100) surface. In that case, the experimental esti-
ꢀ1
cles by sintering [19]. Even in this scenario, the gap to bulk RuO
still significant. Regarding the H O responses (Fig. 7b), the situation
appears reversed in the sense that the response of RuO /SnO
Al is broader than that of RuO , showing a tmax higher by 0.4 s
2
is
mate is 0.6 s , as well that contrasts slightly the calculated TOF
ꢀ1
2
value of 1.12 s . The origin of this difference might be related to
the ability of the (100) surface to reconstruct into (110)-like fac-
ets. Indeed, a similar reconstruction has been already proposed
2
2
–
2
O
3
2
and a th/2 shifted to longer times by 0.4 s as well. This difference
is not due to experimental artifacts, since the Kr responses are prac-
tically identical in all cases, but most likely relates to the presence
of alumina in the former sample. Therefore, the TAP response sug-
gests that alumina affects the adsorption/desorption equilibrium of
water, inducing a somewhat more impeded evolution of this
for TiO
surfaces are
2
(100) [41]. The surface energies for the (110) and (100)
ꢀ2
c110 = 0.041 and c100 = 0.047 eV Å and the difference
can be the driving force for reconstruction. The reconstruction
would account then for the similar reactivity of both (110) and
(100) surfaces observed experimentally. Finally, it is important
to notice that the Wulff construction and the XRD pattern of pure
product from the binder-containing catalyst. As for the RuO
catalyst, again, it shows a promoted product desorption with
respect to RuO indicating the role of structural effects, upon
2
/SnO
2
2
RuO powder seem to indicate 10–15% contribution of this (100)
facet, though X-ray diffraction is a bulk technique and thus cannot
precisely determine if the topmost layers are partially recon-
structed. Therefore, in modeling a nanoparticle structure, we ne-
glected the (100) facet. Based on the above discussion, in the MK
2
supporting ruthenium, in the reaction.
Valuable insights into the reaction mechanism on RuO
2 2
/SnO –
2
Al O
3
were obtained from the examination of the Cl
2
responses
2
modeling of case ‘‘RuO nanoparticle,’’ we have employed a relative
in pump–probe experiments. A detailed description of these exper-
iments was given in Refs. [19,26]. These measurements were sys-
surface area for the (110) facet of about 58% and 42% (101). As we
will see later, these results are robust enough as small modifica-
tions in these values do not change the trends observed.
In order to gain further insight into the mechanism, we have
investigated the inhibiting role of reaction products. For this, the
micro-kinetic model on the nanoparticle structure, MK–NP, was
tematically obtained with O
pump and HCl probe or HCl pump and O
between the pump and probe pulses ( t) was varied in the range
of 1–12 s, which enables to study the influence of the pump mole-
cule coverage on the Cl production. The consecutive cycles were
2
and HCl exchanging their roles (O
2
2
probe). The time delay
D
2
investigated at T = 573 K, p(O
variable initial pressures of either Cl
0.6 bar. The results are displayed in Fig. 9. Although the effect
shown here for H O is smaller than in Fig. 3b, the micro-kinetic
2
) = 0.2 bar, and p(HCl) = 0.2 bar with
linked in such a way that the time elapsed between the probe pulse
and the pump pulse of the next cycle was always 10 s. The cover-
age of the probe molecule at the beginning of the cycle is therefore
very low, since the probe pulse has almost entirely eluted after
2
or H O in the range of 0–
2
2
model based on the DFT-calculated parameters does tend to qual-
itative reproduce the flow experiments, and a reduction in the
overall activity is obtained when increasing the pressure of the
products at the reactor inlet.
We have analyzed in detail the dependence of the reaction rate
to the intermediates adsorbed on the surface with the aim of
unraveling the origin for the observations in the PGAA experi-
ments. For this purpose, we have simulated the experimental con-
ditions used during PGAA (p(HCl) = 0.2 bar, 573 K) by varying the
1
0 s. The transient responses of Cl
sented in Fig. 8. Chlorine production progressively decreases as
increases both when O is the pump (Fig. 8a) and when HCl is the
pump (Fig. 8b). This trend is qualitatively identical to RuO [18]
2 2 2 2 3
over RuO /SnO –Al O are pre-
D
t
2
2
and indicates that the catalytic activity depends on the coverage
of both adsorbed species. Further details on the mechanism can
be attained by the analysis of the
tion (Fig. 8c). When O is the pump molecule, increasing the time
until HCl is pulsed ( t) from 1 to 12 s provokes a decrease in Cl
2
Dt effect on the total Cl produc-
2
D
2
2
p(HCl):p(O ) ratio from 1:4 to 1:0.25, see Fig. 10. To better under-
production of ca. 100%. This is a direct evidence of reaction with
adsorbed oxygen. Similarly, when HCl is the pump, an important
stand the data, we have proceeded as follows, first the individual
(110) and (101) surfaces have been analyzed and the rates for
these surfaces as a function of the surface coverages obtained. In
the second step, a nanoparticle containing both (110) and (101)
surfaces was considered. Finally, the role of the SnO support
2
was studied in a different set of computational experiments,
Fig. 11. To compare all reaction rates in the batch MK model, the
decrease in Cl
served, implying that the reaction occurs through adsorbed Cl spe-
cies. These data support that HCl oxidation on RuO /SnO –Al
proceeds via a Langmuir–Hinshelwood mechanism, in line with
the observations made for bulk RuO and RuO /TiO catalysts
18] and also in agreement with PGAA data.
2
production with increasing Dt (ca. 120%) is ob-
2
2
2
O
3
2
2
2
[
2
production of Cl was obtained always at the same time (t = 0.1 s).