Paper
RSC Advances
¨
the heat transfer efficiency is increased, which makes a small
amount of heat sufficient for the LA to be rapidly decomposed
in a short time, resulting in an increase in the ame sensitivity
of LA@PC. Therefore, the thermal conductivity of the carbon
skeleton and nanoscale LA is the key to the increase in ame
sensitivity. Moreover, the schematic diagram of the mechanism
of electrostatic sensitivity reduction of LA@PC is shown in
Fig. 4b. Since the large particles of LA are gathered together, the
6 D. Fischer, T. M. Klapotke and J. Stierstorfer, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 2015, 54, 10299–10302.
7 C. He and J. M. Shreeve, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2016, 55, 772–
775.
8 D. D. Ford, S. Lenahan, M. Jorgensen, P. Dube, M. Delude
and P. E. Concannon, Org. Process Res. Dev., 2015, 19, 673–
680.
¨
´
9 J. Giles, Nature, 2004, 427, 580–581.
´
static charge cannot be guided away in time, which leads to the 10 M. Krawiec, S. R. Anderson, P. Dube, D. D. Ford, J. S. Salan,
electrostatic explosion to a large extent. However, when the
nano-scale LA is uniformly dispersed on the carbon skeleton,
S. Lenahan, N. Mehta and C. R. Explos, Pyrotech, 2015, 40,
457–459.
the carbon skeleton is equivalent to the nano-scale Faraday 11 R. Matyas, J. Selesovsky and T. Musil, J. Hazard. Mater., 2012,
cage, which can lead a part of the electric charge, reducing the 213, 236–241.
possibility of explosion due to static electricity and improving 12 M. B. Talawar, A. P. Agrawal, M. Anniyappan, D. S. Wani,
the safety of the system. Therefore, it is believed that the porous
carbon skeleton and uniform distribution of LA are the main
reason for the low sensitivity of LA@PC.
M. K. Bansode and G. M. Gore, J. Hazard. Mater., 2006,
137, 1074–1078.
13 E. Beloni and E. L. Dreizin, Combust. Flame, 2009, 156, 1386–
1395.
14 S. P. M. Bane, J. E. Shepherd, E. Kwon and A. C. Day, Int. J.
Hydrogen Energy, 2011, 36, 2344–2350.
Conclusions
15 D. Skineer, D. Olson and A. Block-Bolten, Propellants,
Explos., Pyrotech., 1998, 23, 34–42.
16 M. Zhou, Z. Li and Z. Zhou, Propellants, Explos., Pyrotech.,
2013, 38, 569–576.
17 G. W. C. Taylor, W. Abbey and S. E. Napier, Preparation of
Explosive Substances Containing Carboxymethyl Cellulose,
US Pat., 3,291,664, Minister of Aviation in Her Britannic
Majesty's Government of the United Kingdom of Great
Britain and Northern Ireland, London, England, 1966.
18 R. Janardhanan, V. Vuayabasker and B. S. R. Reddy, J. Am.
Leather Chem. Assoc., 2012, 107, 231–242.
In summary, we rst prepared LA@PC by in situ azidation and
carbonization of low-cost PAA-Pb hydrogel, in which nanoscale
LA was uniformly distributed on the oxygen-rich porous carbon
skeleton. The prepared LA@PC composite has lower electro-
static sensitivity and high ignition capability, and the ame
sensitivity can reach 42 cm, which makes it possible for lead
azide to be used without the ignition powder LS. The synthesis
of LA@PC solves the problem that the pure lead azide ame has
low ame sensitivity and poor ignition ability, and has high
research value and application prospect.
19 J. Liu, Y. Jiang, W. Tong, T. Zhang and L. Yang, Propellants,
Explos., Pyrotech., 2016, 41, 267–272.
Conflicts of interest
20 G. W. C. Taylor, W. Abbey and S. E. Napier, Lead Styphnate
Containing Methyl Cellulose, US Pat., 3,291,663, Minister
of Aviation in Her Britannic Majesty's Government of the
nitedKingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland,
London, England, 1966.
21 Z.-M. Li, M.-R. Zhou, T.-L. Zhang, J.-G. Zhang, L. Yang and
Z.-N. Zhou, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2013, 1, 12710–12714.
22 Z.-M. Li, M.-R. Zhou and T.-L. Zhang, Mater. Lett., 2014, 123,
79–82.
There are no conicts to declare.
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge nancial support from the National
Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11672040), the State
Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology (No.
YB2016-17), and Beijing Institute of Technology Research Fund
Program for Young Scholars.
23 Q. Wang, X. Feng, S. Wang, et al., Adv. Mater., 2016, 28, 5837–
5843.
24 R. Xu, Z. Yan, L. Yang, et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2018,
10, 22545–22551.
References
1 J. W. Fronabarger, M. D. Williams, W. B. Sanborn, 25 By J. Lee, J. Kim and T. Hyeon, Adv. Mater., 2006, 18, 2073–
J. G. Bragg, D. A. Parrish and M. Bichay, Propellants,
Explos., Pyrotech., 2011, 36, 541.
2 L. Zhai, X. Fan, B. Wang and F. Bi, RSC Adv., 2015, 5, 57833–
57841.
3 N. Mehta, K. Oyler, G. Cheng, A. Shah and Z. Anorg, Allg. J.
Chem., 2014, 640, 1309–1313.
4 D. Chen, H. W. Yang and Z. X. Yi, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2018, 57, 2081–2084.
2094.
26 M. Yang and Q. Gao, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2011,
143, 230–235.
27 Y. Mao, H. Duan, B. Xu, et al., Energy Environ. Sci., 2012, 5,
7950–7955.
28 V. Pelletier, S. Bhattacharyya, I. Knoke, et al., Adv. Funct.
Mater., 2010, 20, 3168–3174.
29 W. Xia, B. Qiu, D. Xia, et al., Sci. Rep., 2013, 3, 1935.
5 W. Li, K. C. Wang and Q. H. Zhang, Cryst. Growth Des., 2018, 30 W. Xia, J. Zhu, W. Guo, et al., J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014, 2,
18, 1896–1902.
11606–11613.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020
RSC Adv., 2020, 10, 14347–14352 | 14351