2002
G. Srinivas et al. / Physica C 469 (2009) 2000–2002
hydrogenation usually proceeds from the surface of a material,
with most of the reaction nucleates at defects or grain boundaries
(or microcracks in the case of metal hydride system), in the hydro-
genated system, the fraction of remaining superconducting phases
are separated by large regions of normal conducting or insulating
material, CaH2. Further, the field dependence of magnetisation of
partially hydrogenated samples reveal the decreased lower critical
field (HC1, defined as M(H) minimum). This can be attributed to the
increased penetration depth (k), since the intercalant disorder
caused by motion of Ca atoms and inhomogeneous distribution
of remaining superconducting CaC6 phase can bring changes in
the penetration depth and in the coherence length (n).
0
-20
5 K
-40
4. Conclusion
-60
pristine CaC6
15 min in H2
30 min in H2
45 min in H2
1 h in H2
We report the first detailed study of high temperature hydroge-
nation in bulk CaC6 synthesized by molten Li–Ca alloy method. The
hydrogenation eventually regenerates the constituent graphite by
forming CaH2 as Ca is deintercalated from CaC6. The successive
suppression of superconductivity of CaC6 upon increasing hydroge-
nation time is attributed to the decrease in superconducting CaC6
phase volume fraction due to the phase separation and formation
of CaH2 at the expense of CaC6 phase.
-80
-100
-120
5 h in H2
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the EPSRC Grant Nos. EP/F027923/
1 and EP/E003907/1 and by a Royal Society & Wolfson Foundation
Laboratory Refurbishment award. We wish thanks to Arthur Lovell
for his help.
0
500
1000
1500
2000
H (Oe)
Fig. 3. The field dependent magnetization along c-axis at 5 K for pristine and
hydrogenated CaC6 samples. The samples subjected to different hydrogen exposure
times at 500 °C and 10 bars of hydrogen pressure.
References
[1] A. Lovell, F. Fernandez-Alonso, N.T. Skipper, K. Refson, S.M. Bennington, S.F.
Parker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008) 126101.
as a function of hydrogen exposure time. The pristine CaC6 sample
shows the superconducting onset transition temperature,
TC = 11.5 K consistent with previous reports [8]. Fig. 3 shows the
hydrogenation and field dependence of ZFC–magnetization (M–
H) plots measured at 5 K with the field oriented along the c-axis.
Pristine and all the superconducting hydrogenated CaC6 samples
behave type-II superconducting nature [8]. The hydrogenated sam-
ples show the gradual suppression of superconductivity with
increasing the hydrogenation time. This can be observed by de-
creased diamagnetic signal strength in both the temperature and
field dependence of magnetization plots. This can be directly corre-
lated to the decreased superconducting volume fraction of CaC6
phase due to the growth of CaH2 at the expense of CaC6 phase as
indicated by XRD results in Fig. 1. Thus the hydrogen saturated
sample did not exhibit superconductivity because of complete
deterioration of CaC6 phase. The closure observation of supercon-
ducting transitions in partially hydrogenated samples in inset of
Fig. 2 reveals the broader onset of transitions without much appre-
ciable change in onset of TC. The broader transitions can be often
seen in non-homogeneous systems [18], since the transition width
depends more on the flux pinning properties of the samples. Since
[2] Y. Kojima, N. Suzuki, Appl. Phys. Lett. 84 (2004) 4113.
[3] T. Enoki, S. Miyajima, M. Sano, H. Inokuchi, J. Mater. Res. 5 (1990) 435.
[4] W. Ishida, H. Miyaoka, T. Ichikawa, Y. Kojima, Carbon 46 (2008) 1628.
[5] M. Sano, H. Inokuchi, M. Kobayashi, S. Kaneiwa, I. Tsujikawa, J. Chem. Phys. 72
(1980) 3840.
[6] S. Kaneiwa, M. Kobayashi, I. Tsujikawa, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 51 (1982) 2375.
[7] G. Roth, A. Chaiken, T. Enoki, N.C. Yeh, G. Dresselhaus, P.M. Tedrow, Phys. Rev.
B 32 (1985) 533.
[8] N. Emery, C. Herold, J.F. Marache, P. Lagrange, Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 9
(2008) 044102.
[9] G. Srinivas, C.A. Howard, S.M. Bennington, N.T. Skipper, M. Ellerby, J. Mater.
Chem. 19 (2009) 5239.
[10] J. Bergsma, B.O. Loopstra, Acta. Crystallogr. 15 (1962) 92.
[11] D. Guerard, Ph.D. thesis, University of Nancy France, 1974.
[12] L. Pietronero, S. Strassler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47 (1981) 593.
[13] A. Klaveness, H. Fjellvag, A. Kjekshus, P. Ravindran, O. Swang, J. Alloys. Compd.
469 (2009) 617.
[14] N. Emery, C. Herold, M. d’Astuto, V. Garcia, C. Bellin, J.F. Mareche, P. Lagrange,
G. Loupias, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 087003.
[15] S. Pruvost, C. Herold, A. Herold, P. Legrange, Carbon 41 (2003) 1281.
[16] M.P. Sridhar Kumar, B. Viswanathan, C.S. Swamy, V. Srinivasan, Mater. Chem.
Phys. 20 (1988) 245.
[17] G. Srinivas, V. Sankaranarayanan, S. Ramaprabhu, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 20
(2008) 255224.
[18] T.E. Weller, M. Ellerby, S.S. Saxena, R.P. Smith, N.T. Skipper, Nat. Phys. 1 (2005)
39.