2024
N. Selvakumar et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 48 (2007) 2021–2024
Engl. 1985, 24, 94–110; (d) Cavallito, C. J.; Fruehauf, D.
(0.01 M) in dry DCM followed by titanium tetraisoprop-
oxide (10 mol %) under argon. To this solution was added
dropwise a 0.01 M solution of catalyst 12 (10 mol %) in
dry DCM over 12 h at reflux using a syringe pump. The
mixture was stirred at reflux for a further 24 h. The
reaction mixture was allowed to cool and then washed
with water, brine and dried. The solvent was removed in
vacuo and the residue was purified by silica gel chroma-
tography to separate the desired cyclisation product from
the recovered starting material.
M.; Bailey, J. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1948, 70, 3724–3726;
(e) Zopf, W. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1902, 324, 39–78, and
references cited therein.
2. (a) Park, B. K.; Nakagawa, M.; Hirota, A.; Nakayama,
M. J. Antibiot. 1988, 41, 751–758; (b) Muller, K. Appl.
Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2001, 56, 9–56, and references cited
therein.
3. (a) Amador, M.; Ariza, X.; Garcia, J.; Ortiz, J. J. Org.
Chem. 2004, 69, 8172–8175; (b) Chhor, R. B.; Nosse, B.;
Sorgel, S.; Bohm, C.; Seitz, M.; Reiser, O. Chem. Eur. J.
2003, 9, 260–270; (c) Bella, M.; Margarita, R.; Orlando,
C.; Orsini, M.; Parlanti, L.; Piancatelli, G. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2000, 41, 561–565; (d) Masaki, Y.; Arasaki, h.; Itoh,
A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 4829–4832; (e) Drioli, S.;
Felluga, F.; Forzato, C.; Nitti, P.; Pitacco, G.; Valentin, E.
J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 2385–2388; (f) Zhang, Z.; Lu, X.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1996, 7, 1923–1928; (g) Jacobi, P.
A.; Herradura, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 46, 8297–8300,
and references cited therein.
9. The starting dienes for entries 1–6 were prepared from the
corresponding acrylates and appropriate aldehydes using
Baylis–Hillman reactions followed by acryloylation. Fol-
lowing the same sequence, the dienes in entries 7 and 8
were prepared from methyl vinyl ketone and acrylonitrile,
respectively.
10. Selected spectral data for compound 6: (oil) 1H NMR
(CDCl3, 400 MHz): d 6.64 (d, J = 1.9 Hz, 1H), 5.21 (ddd,
J = 8.1, 3.0 and 2.2 Hz, 1H), 4.38–4.30 (m, 2H), 2.16–2.08
(m, 1H), 1.69–1.60 (m, 1H), 1.36 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H), 1.45–
1.25 (m, 6H), 0.90–0.87 (m, 3H). 13C NMR (CDCl3,
50 MHz): d 171.0, 161.0, 157.7, 126.6, 82.6, 62.1, 32.4,
31.3, 24.3, 22.3, 14.0, 13.9. IR (neat): 1769, 1728, 1223,
4. For some recent reviews related to RCM reactions, see: (a)
Dieters, A.; Martin, S. F. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 2199–
2238;; (b) Grubbs, R. H.; Trnka, T. M. Acc. Chem. Res.
2001, 34, 18–29.
1156 cmÀ1
.
5. For some selected references related to the Baylis–Hillman
reaction, see: (a) Basavaiah, D.; Rao, A. J.; Satyanara-
yana, T. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 811–891; (b) Krishna, P.
R.; Manjuvani, A.; Kannan, V.; Sharma, G. V. M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 1183–1185; (c) Yu, C.; Liu, B.;
Hu, L. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 5413–5418, and the
references cited therein.
6. Bassetti, M.; D’Annibale, A.; Fanfoni, A.; Minissi, F. Org.
Lett. 2005, 7, 1805–1808.
7. (a) Yang, Q.; Xiao, W. J.; Yu, Z. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 871–
874; (b) You, Z. W.; Wu, Y. Y.; Qing, F. L. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2004, 45, 9479–9481; (c) Gosh, A. K.; Liu, C. Chem.
Commun. 1999, 1743–1744.
11. The spectral data of compounds 28 and 29 were identical
to reported values. Drioli, S.; Felluga, F.; Forzato, C.;
Nitti, P.; Pitacco, G.; Valentin, E. Chem. Commun. 1996,
1289–1290.
weak
noe
strong
noe
H
O
H
O
E
E
H
H
O
C5H11
O
C5H11
29
28
E = CO2Et
8. General experimental procedure for RCM: A two-neck
flask equipped with a condenser was flame dried in vacuo
and charged successively with a solution of the diene
12. For a synthesis of nephrosteranic acid 3, see: Barros, M.
T.; Maycock, C. D.; Ventura, M. R. Org. Lett. 2003, 5,
4097–4099.