Table 1 Time constants of relaxation processes in solvents
transfer completes the relaxation process. Due to the large
energy difference of the back transfer reaction, it appears in
the inverted region. Therefore, the activation barrier decreases
in polar solvents when the reaction energy decreases.
Solvent
e
t
1
/ps
2
t /ps
benzene
chloroform
acetone
2.28
4.81
66 ꢂ 3
64 ꢂ 3
56 ꢂ 10
7000 ꢂ 1000
475 ꢂ 10
The relaxation process in acetone solution is slightly more
complex. Evidently only a fraction of molecules relax to the
ground state on a picosecond time scale, whereas another frac-
tion forms longer-lived transients, which disappear faster than
over 0.5 s. The absorption spectrum of these transients in the
700–850-nm region is similar to the biradical state absorption,
however, there is a difference at short wavelengths where the
long-lived transients do not absorb. Judging from the absorp-
tion spectrum features of the long-lived transient, it should be
also attributed to the N-EtCz cation radical. Probably some
chemical reaction, like electron transfer between OTC chromo-
phore anion radical and acetone or dissolved oxygen molecule
competes with the intramolecular back electron transfer creat-
ing long-lived transients. Another possible mechanism may be
related to the folding of molecules. If the molecules are folded
so that the two fragments are close to each other, then under
creation of the charge transfer state, solvation forces in highly
polar solvent may unfold the molecule and stabilize the charge
transfer state. This reaction needs additional investigation.
20.7
110 ꢂ 10
polarity. However, almost equal relaxation rates in nonpolar
solvent, benzene, and highly polar acetone, show that the 60
ps relaxation process cannot be identified with the electron
transfer. It is more natural to relate it to the excitation energy
2
4
transfer from N-EtCz to OTC fragment. As was shown in the
charge transfer in intermolecular charge transfer complexes
may take place under excitation of electron-acceptor molecule.
Such process is also typical for sensibilization of Cz containing
2
5
polymers. Thus, energy transfer from N-EtCz to OTC frag-
ment may take place prior to electron transfer. If the energy
transfer rate is slower than the subsequent electron transfer,
then namely the energy transfer determines the charge transfer
state formation kinetics. Since the energy transfer process is
independent, or only weakly depends on the solvent polarity,
the charge transfer state formation rate only weakly depends
on the polarity as well. Population of the OTC fragment
excited state in this case always remains negligible, what
explains the absence of the OTC fragment fluorescence
features in CHTT fluorescence spectrum.
Conclusions
We have examined the photoinduced intramolecular charge
transfer between electrondonating and electronaccepting
fragments of the CHTT molecule in various solutions. The
interaction between the OTC and N-EtCz chromophores is
relatively week so that the chromophores retain their indivi-
dual absorption properties, and the excitation energy transfer
from the EtCz to OTC fragment is relatively slow, taking place
on tens of picoseconds time scale. The charge transfer from the
N-EtCz fragment to the OTC fragment occurs very rapidly
after transfer of excitation energy to OTC fragment. The back
transfer rate is much slower and strongly depends on the
solvent polarity.
The photogenerated charge transfer states in the bipolar
electron-hole transporting material produced from bipolar
molecules may act as efficient charge carrier recombination
centers. This should be accounted for in attempts to use such
materials in electrooptical devices.
The last relaxation process, the electron back-transfer, may
be treated in terms of the Marcus electron transfer theory.
2
6
The energy of the charge transfer state should decrease in polar
solvents due to the increase in the solvation energy. Thus, the
difference between the charge transfer state and the ground
state energies should diminish. In the ‘‘normal’’ electron trans-
fer region, the transfer rate increases with increasing the energy
difference between the reactant and product state. However,
the back electron transfer in CHTT molecules evidently
appears in the inverted Marcus region, and therefore shows
opposite transfer rate dependence on the reaction free energy.
Such dependence is typical of the electron transfer reactions
with large reaction free energy and may be treated in terms of
the energy gap law. Similar dependence of relaxation rates on
the solvent polarity was typically observed in charge transfer
2
7
complexes.
Fig. 6 shows a schematic diagram of the excited state relaxa-
tion in the CHTT compound. After excitation of the molecule
to the second singlet state S
the N-EtCz fragment, the energy transfer to the OTC fragment
forms the S excited state with the time constant k . Later on
an electron is transferred from the N-EtCz fragment to the
OTC fragment. The forward transfer appears in the ‘‘normal’’
2
corresponding to the excitation of
References
1
P. Strohriegel and J. V. Grazulevicius, Adv. Mater., 2002, 14,
439–1452.
Y. Shirota, J. Mater. Chem., 2000, 10, 1–25.
A. Dodabalapur, Solid State Commun., 1997, 102, 259–267.
H. K. Shim, T. Ahn and S. Y. Song, Thin Solid Films, 2002,
417, 7–13.
1
1
1
2
3
4
region and is very fast, therefore, occupation of the S state
1
remains negligible and the population rate of the CT state is
determined by the energy transfer rate k . The electron back
5
6
7
8
G. Horowitz, Adv. Mater., 1998, 10, 363–377.
G. Horowitz, J. Mater. Chem., 1999, 9, 2021–2026.
D. Woehrle and D. Meissner, Adv. Mater., 1991, 3, 129–138.
C. J. Brabec, N. S. Sariciftci and J. C. Hummelen, Adv. Funct.
Mater., 2001, 11, 15–27.
1
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
M. Matsui, K. Fukuyasu, K. Shibata and H. Muramatsu,
J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans., 1993, 2, 1107–1110.
P. M. Borsenberger, E. H. Magin and M. R. Detty, J. Imag. Sci.
Technol., 1995, 39, 12–18.
P. M. Borsenberger, H.-C. Kan, E. H. Magin and W. B. Vreeland,
J. Imag. Sci. Technol., 1995, 39, 6–11.
M. Matsui, K. Shibata, H. Muramatsu and H. Nakazumi,
J. Mater. Chem., 1996, 6(7), 1113–1118.
J. E. Kaeding, B. J. Murray, W. T. Gruenbaum and P. M.
Borsenberger, J. Imag. Sci. Technol., 1996, 40, 245–248.
W. T. Gruenbaum, E. H. Magin and P. M. Borsenberger, J. Imag.
Sci. Technol., 1996, 40, 310–317.
1
1
1
1
1
1
H. Naito, Y. Ohsawa and Sh. Mimura, Appl. Phys. Lett., 1999,
75, 376–378.
16 G. Weiser and H. Seki, IBM J. Res. Develop., 1972, 16, 598–603.
Fig. 6 Schematic diagram of the excited state relaxation of the
CHTT compound.
T h i s j o u r n a l i s Q T h e O w n e r S o c i e t i e s 2 0 0 4
P h y s . C h e m . C h e m . P h y s . , 2 0 0 4 , 6 , 2 2 7 6 – 2 2 8 0
2279