65392-83-8Relevant academic research and scientific papers
Synthesis of m-Alkylphenols via a Ruthenium-Catalyzed C-H Bond Functionalization of Phenol Derivatives
Li, Gang,Gao, Panpan,Lv, Xulu,Qu, Chen,Yan, Qingkai,Wang, Ya,Yang, Suling,Wang, Junjie
supporting information, p. 2682 - 2685 (2017/05/24)
The first example of the synthesis of m-alkylphenols via a ruthenium-catalyzed CAr-H bond functionalization of phenol derivatives with sec/tert-alkyl bromides is reported. Mechanistic studies indicated that the m-CAr-H bond alkylation may involve a radical process and that a six-membered ruthenacycle complex was the active catalyst. Moreover, this approach can provide an expedited strategy for the atom-/step-economical synthesis of many noteworthy pharmaceuticals and other functional molecules.
Equilibria for the isomerization of (secondary-alkyl)phenols and cyclohexylphenols
Nesterova, T. N.,Pimerzin, A. A.,Rozhnov, A. M.,Karlina, T. N.
, p. 385 - 396 (2007/10/02)
Equilibria of a series of isomerizations and trans-alkylations of alkylphenols have been investigated in the liquid phase over a wide range of temperatures.Equilibria of isomerizations connected with the displacement of a substituent on a benzene nucleus were studied for secondary-butyl, -amyl, -hexyl, and cyclohexyl-phenols, and di-(secondary-butyl)phenols.Equilibria of positional isomerization connected with the displacement of an oxyphenyl radical in an alkyl chain were investigated for oxyphenyl-pentanes, -hexanes, -octanes, and -decanes.Trans-alkylation was investigated for di- and tri-(secondary-butyl)phenols.Values of ΔrH0m and ΔrS0m were found for all investigated reactions.An analysis was made of the thermodynamic quantities for the reactions.Enthalpies of formation of isopropylphenols (IPP) in the gaseous state were calculated.The values of ΔfH0m/(kJ * mol-1) were found at 298.15 K: o-IPP, -(175.3 +/- 2.4); p-IPP, -(175.3 +/- 2.4); m-IPP, -(175.3 +/-2.4); 2,4-di-IPP, -(254.1 +/- 2.8); 2,5-di-IPP, -(254.1 +/- 2.8); 2,6-di-IPP, -(254.1 +/- 2.8); 3,5-di-IPP, -(254.1 +/- 2.8); 2,4,6-tri-IPP, -(333.0 +/- 3.1).
