Welcome to LookChem.com Sign In|Join Free
  • or
N-butyl-4-(2-chloroacetamido)benzamide is a chemical with a specific purpose. Lookchem provides you with multiple data and supplier information of this chemical.

92018-79-6

Post Buying Request

92018-79-6 Suppliers

Recommended suppliers

  • Product
  • FOB Price
  • Min.Order
  • Supply Ability
  • Supplier
  • Contact Supplier

92018-79-6 Usage

Check Digit Verification of cas no

The CAS Registry Mumber 92018-79-6 includes 8 digits separated into 3 groups by hyphens. The first part of the number,starting from the left, has 5 digits, 9,2,0,1 and 8 respectively; the second part has 2 digits, 7 and 9 respectively.
Calculate Digit Verification of CAS Registry Number 92018-79:
(7*9)+(6*2)+(5*0)+(4*1)+(3*8)+(2*7)+(1*9)=126
126 % 10 = 6
So 92018-79-6 is a valid CAS Registry Number.

92018-79-6Relevant academic research and scientific papers

Design, synthesis, molecular docking, anticancer evaluations, and in silico pharmacokinetic studies of novel 5-[(4-chloro/2,4-dichloro)benzylidene]thiazolidine-2,4-dione derivatives as VEGFR-2 inhibitors

El-Adl, Khaled,El-Helby, Abdel-Ghany A.,Sakr, Helmy,Ayyad, Rezk R.,Mahdy, Hazem A.,Nasser, Mohamed,Abulkhair, Hamada S.,El-Hddad, Sanadelaslam S. A.

, (2021)

The anticancer activity of novel thiazolidine-2,4-diones was evaluated against HepG2, HCT-116, and MCF-7 cells. MCF-7 was the most sensitive cell line to the cytotoxicity of the new derivatives. In particular, compounds 18, 12, 17, and 16 were found to be the most potent derivatives over all the tested compounds against the cancer cell lines HepG2, HCT116, and MCF-7, with IC50 = 9.16 ± 0.9, 8.98 ± 0.7, 5.49 ± 0.5 μM; 9.19 ± 0.5, 8.40 ± 0.7, 6.10 ± 0.4 μM; 10.78 ± 1.2, 8.87 ± 1.5, 7.08 ± 1.6 μM; and 10.87 ± 0.8, 9.05 ± 0.7, 7.32 ± 0.4 μM, respectively. Compounds 18 and 12 have nearly the same activities as sorafenib (IC50 = 9.18 ± 0.6, 5.47 ± 0.3, and 7.26 ± 0.3 μM, respectively), against HepG2 cells, but slightly lower activity against HCT116 cells and slightly higher activity against the MCF-7 cancer cell line. Also, these compounds displayed lower activities than doxorubicin against HepG2 and HCT-116 cells but higher activity against MCF-7 cells (IC50 = 7.94 ± 0.6, 8.07 ± 0.8, and 6.75 ± 0.4 μM, respectively). In contrast, compounds 17 and 16 exhibited lower activities than sorafenib against HepG2 and HCT116 cells, but nearly equipotent activity against the MCF-7 cancer cell line. Also, these compounds displayed lower activities than doxorubicin against the three cell lines. All the synthesized derivatives 7–18 were evaluated for their inhibitory activities against VEGFR-2. The tested compounds displayed high to medium inhibitory activity, with IC50 values ranging from 0.17 ± 0.02 to 0.27 ± 0.03 μM. Compounds 18, 12, 17, and 16 potently inhibited VEGFR-2 at IC50 values of 0.17 ± 0.02, 0.17 ± 0.02, 0.18 ± 0.02, and 0.18 ± 0.02 μM, respectively, which are nearly more than half of that of the IC50 value for sorafenib (0.10 ± 0.02 μM).

New quinoxaline derivatives as VEGFR-2 inhibitors with anticancer and apoptotic activity: Design, molecular modeling, and synthesis

Alsaif, Nawaf A.,Dahab, Mohammed A.,Alanazi, Mohammed M.,Obaidullah, Ahmad J.,Al-Mehizia, Abdulrahman A.,Alanazi, Manal M.,Aldawas, Saleh,Mahdy, Hazem A.,Elkady, Hazem

, (2021/03/16)

New series of [1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-a]quinoxalin-4(5H)-one and [1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-a]quinoxaline derivatives have been designed, synthesized, and biologically assessed for their anti-proliferative activities against two selected tumor cell lines MCF-7 and HepG2. Comparing to sorafenib (IC50 = 2.17 ± 0.13 and 3.51 ± 0.21 μM against MCF-7 and HepG2, respectively), compound 25d, 25e, 25i, and 27e exhibited the highest activities against the examined cell lines with IC50 values extending from 4.1 ± 0.4 to 11.7 ± 1.1 μM. Furthermore, VEGFR-2 inhibitory activities were assessed for all the synthesized compounds as potential mechanisms for their anti-proliferative activities. Compounds 25d, 25e, 25i, and 27e displayed prominent inhibitory efficiency versus VEGFR-2 kinase with IC50 value ranging from 3.4 ± 0.3 to 6.8 ± 0.5 nM. Fascinatingly, the results of VEGFR-2 inhibitory assays were matched with that of the cytotoxicity data, where the most potent anti-proliferative derivatives exhibited promising VEGFR-2 inhibitory activities. Further studies displayed the ability of compound 25d to induce apoptosis in HepG2 cells and can arrest the growth of such cells at the G2/M phase. Also, compound 25d produced a significant increase in the level of BAX/Bcl-2 ratio (3.8-fold), caspase- 3 (1.8-fold), and caspase-9 (1.9-fold) compared to the control cells. Molecular docking studies were carried out to investigate the possible binding interaction inside the active site of the VEGFR-2.

Discovery of new VEGFR-2 inhibitors based on bis([1, 2, 4]triazolo)[4,3-a:3',4'-c]quinoxaline derivatives as anticancer agents and apoptosis inducers

Alsaif, Nawaf A.,Taghour, Mohammed S.,Alanazi, Mohammed M.,Obaidullah, Ahmad J.,Al-Mehizia, Abdulrahman A.,Alanazi, Manal M.,Aldawas, Saleh,Elwan, Alaa,Elkady, Hazem

, p. 1093 - 1114 (2021/06/11)

Herein, a new wave of bis([1, 2, 4]triazolo)[4,3-a:3',4'-c]quinoxaline derivatives have been successfully designed and synthesised. The synthesised derivatives were biologically investigated for their cytotoxic activities against HepG2 and MCF-7. Also, the tested compounds were further examined in?vitro for their VEGFR-2 inhibitory activity. The most promising derivative 23j was further investigated for its apoptotic behaviour in HepG2 cell lines using flow cytometric and western-plot analyses. Additional in-silico studies were performed to predict how the synthesised compounds can bind to VEGFR-2 and to determine the drug-likeness profiling of these derivatives. The results revealed that compounds 23a, 23i, 23j, 23l, and 23n displayed the highest antiproliferative activities against the two cell lines with IC50 values ranging from 6.4 to 19.4 μM. Furthermore, compounds 23a, 23d, 23h, 23i, 23j, 23l, 23 m, and 23n showed the highest VEGFR-2 inhibitory activities with IC50 values ranging from 3.7 to 11.8 nM, comparing to sorafenib (IC50 = 3.12 nM). Moreover, compound 23j arrested the HepG2 cell growth at the G2/M phase and induced apoptosis by 40.12% compared to the control cells (7.07%). As well, such compound showed a significant increase in the level of caspase-3 (1.36-fold), caspase-9 (2.80-fold), and BAX (1.65-fold), and exhibited a significant decrease in Bcl-2 level (2.63-fold).

New quinoxaline-based VEGFR-2 inhibitors: Design, synthesis, and antiproliferative evaluation with: In silico docking, ADMET, toxicity, and DFT studies

Alanazi, Manal M.,Alanazi, Mohammed M.,Alharbi, Madhawi A.,Alkahtani, Hamad M.,Alsaif, Nawaf A.,Dahab, Mohammed A.,Eissa, Ibrahim H.,Elkady, Hazem,Obaidullah, Ahmad J.

, p. 30315 - 30328 (2021/10/25)

A new series of 3-methylquinoxaline-based derivatives having the same essential pharmacophoric features as VEGFR-2 inhibitors have been synthesized and evaluated for their antiproliferative activities against two human cancer cell lines, MCF-7 and HepG-2. Compounds 15b and 17b demonstrated a significant antiproliferative effect with IC50 ranging from 2.3 to 5.8 μM. An enzymatic assay was carried out for all the tested candidates against VEGFR-2. Compound 17b was the most potent VEGFR-2 inhibitor (IC50 = 2.7 nM). Mechanistic investigation including cell cycle arrest and apoptosis was performed for compound 17b against HepG-2 cells, and the results revealed that 17b induced cell apoptosis and arrested cell cycle in the G2/M phase. Moreover, apoptosis analyses were conducted for compound 17b to evaluate its apoptotic potential. The results showed upregulation in caspase-3 and caspase-9 levels, and improving the Bax/Bcl-2 ratio by more than 10-fold. Docking studies were performed to determine the possible interaction with the VEGFR-2 active site. Further docking studies were carried out for compound 17b against cytochrome P450 to present such compounds as non-inhibitors. In silico ADMET, toxicity, and physico-chemical properties revealed that most of the synthesized members have acceptable values of drug-likeness. Finally, DFT studies were carried out to calculate the thermodynamic, molecular orbital and electrostatic potential properties.

5-(4-Methoxybenzylidene)thiazolidine-2,4-dione-derived VEGFR-2 inhibitors: Design, synthesis, molecular docking, and anticancer evaluations

El-Adl, Khaled,Sakr, Helmy,Nasser, Mohamed,Alswah, Mohamed,Shoman, Fatma M. A.

, (2020/06/17)

A novel series of 5-(4-methoxybenzylidene)thiazolidine-2,4-dione derivatives, 5a–g and 7a–f, was designed, synthesized, and evaluated for their anticancer activity against HepG2, HCT116, and MCF-7 cells. HepG2 and HCT116 were the most sensitive cell lines to the influence of the new derivatives. In particular, compounds 7f, 7e, 7d, and 7c were found to be the most potent derivatives of all the tested compounds against the HepG2, HCT116, and MCF-7 cancer cell lines. Compound 7f (IC50 = 6.19 ± 0.5, 5.47 ± 0.3, and 7.26 ± 0.3 μM, respectively) exhibited a higher activity than sorafenib (IC50 = 9.18 ± 0.6, 8.37 ± 0.7, and 5.10 ± 0.4 μM, respectively) against HepG2 and MCF-7, cells but a lower activity against HCT116 cancer cells, respectively. Also, this compound displayed a higher activity than doxorubicin (IC50 = 7.94 ± 0.6, 8.07 ± 0.8, and 6.75 ± 0.4 μM, respectively) against HepG2 and MCF-7 cells, but nearly the same activity against HCT116 cells, respectively. All derivatives, 5a–g and 7a–f, were evaluated for their inhibitory activities against vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2). Among them, compound 7f was found to be the most potent derivative that inhibited VEGFR-2 at an IC50 value of 0.12 ± 0.02 μM, which is nearly the same as that of sorafenib (IC50 = 0.10 ± 0.02 μM). Compounds 7e, 7d, 7c, and 7b exhibited the highest activity, with IC50 values of 0.13 ± 0.02, 0.14 ± 0.02, 0.14 ± 0.02, and 0.18 ± 0.03 μM, respectively, which are more than the half of that of sorafenib. Furthermore, molecular docking was performed to investigate their binding mode and affinities toward the VEGFR-2 receptor. The data obtained from the docking studies highly correlated with those obtained from the biological screening.

Design, synthesis, molecular docking and anticancer evaluations of 5-benzylidenethiazolidine-2,4-dione derivatives targeting VEGFR-2 enzyme

Eissa, Ibrahim H.,El-Adl, Khaled,El-Hddad, Sanadelaslam S. A.,El-Helby, Abdel-Ghany A.,M. I. A. Shoman, Fatma,Sakr, Helmy

, (2020/07/13)

Novel series of 5-benzylidenethiazolidine-2,4-dione derivatives 4a-c-8a-f were designed, synthesized and evaluated for anticancer activity against HepG2, HCT-116 and MCF-7 cell lines. MCF-7 was the most sensitive cell line to the influence of the new derivatives. In particular, compound 8f was found to be the most potent derivative overall the tested compounds against the three HepG2, HCT116 and MCF-7 cancer cell lines with IC50 = 11.19 ± 0.8, 8.99 ± 0.7 and 7.10 ± 0.4 μM respectively. Compound 8f exhibited lower activity than sorafenib, (IC50 = 9.18 ± 0.6, 8.37 ± 0.7 and 5.10 ± 0.4 μM respectively), against HepG2 and HCT116 but exhibited nearly the same activity against MCF-7 cancer cell lines respectively. Also, this compound displayed lower activity than doxorubicin, (IC50 = 7.94 ± 0.6, 8.07 ± 0.8 and 6.75 ± 0.4 μM respectively), against HepG2 and HCT116 but nearly the same activity against MCF-7cell lines respectively. The most active derivatives 6c,d,f,g and 8a-f were evaluated for their inhibitory activities against VEGFR-2. The elongation of the structures to have distal moieties enhanced anticancer and VEGFR-2 inhibitory activities as in compounds 8a-f. Among them, compounds 8f was found to be the most potent derivative that inhibited VEGFR-2 at IC50 value of 0.22 ± 0.02 μM, which is nearly the half as that of sorafenib IC50 value (0.10 ± 0.02 μM). Furthermore, molecular design was performed to investigate their binding mode and affinities towards VEGFR-2 receptor. The data obtained from docking studies were highly correlated with that obtained from the biological screening.

Post a RFQ

Enter 15 to 2000 letters.Word count: 0 letters

Attach files(File Format: Jpeg, Jpg, Gif, Png, PDF, PPT, Zip, Rar,Word or Excel Maximum File Size: 3MB)

1 Customer Service

What can I do for you?
Get Best Price

Get Best Price for 92018-79-6