click reaction in many areas, such as the design of novel
supramolecular and biomimetic systems.
This work was performed at the Molecular Foundry, Lawrence
Berkeley National Laboratory, and was supported by the Office of
Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the U.S. Department
of Energy under contract No. DE-AC02-05 CH11231. We thank
Prof. K. Barry Sharpless and Prof. Valery V. Fokin for their
support of the early work.
Notes and references
{ For the synthetic details of MC1–3, please see the Electronic
Supplementary Information (ESI{).
1 (a) C. J. Pedersen, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1988, 27, 1021–1027; (b)
G. W. Gokel, W. M. Leevy and M. E. Weber, Chem. Rev., 2004, 104,
2723–2750.
Fig. 3 Optimized structure of the intermediate 8-H?PF6. The reaction
center is highlighted with green ball-and-stick model. The blue arrow
indicates the bond to be formed between triazole N atom and ethoxy C
atom. All the hydrogen atoms were omitted for clarity except for those
involved in hydrogen bonding.
2 (a) C. J. Pedersen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1967, 89, 7017–2036; (b)
R. C. Helgeson, J. M. Timko and D. J. Cram, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1973,
95, 3023–3025; (c) Crown Ethers and Analogous Compounds, ed.
M. Hiraoka, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1992.
3 (a) P. R. Ashton, P. J. Campbell, E. J. T. Chrystal, P. T. Glink,
S. Menzer, D. Philp, N. Spencer, J. F. Stoddart, P. A. Tasker and
D. J. Williams, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1995, 34, 1865–1869; (b)
A. G. Kolchinski, D. H. Busch and N. W. Alcock, J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun., 1995, 1289–1291.
4 (a) P. R. Ashton, P. T. Glink, J. F. Stoddart, P. A. Tasker, A. J. P. White
and D. J. Williams, Chem.–Eur. J., 1996, 2, 729–736; (b) S. J. Cantrill,
S. J. Rowan and J. F. Stoddart, Org. Lett., 1999, 1, 1363–1366; (c)
S.-H. Chiu, S. J. Rowan, S. J. Cantrill, J. F. Stoddart, A. J. P. White and
D. J. Williams, Chem.–Eur. J., 2002, 8, 5170–5183.
5 (a) J.-P. Collin, C. Dietrich-Buchecker, P. Gavina, M. C. Jimenez-
Molero and J.-P. Sauvage, Acc. Chem. Res., 2001, 34, 477–487; (b)
J. D. Badjic, V. Balzani, A. Credi and J. F. Stoddart, Science, 2004, 303,
1845–1849; (c) E. R. Kay, D. A. Leigh and F. Zerbetto, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 72–191.
6 (a) W. S. Bryant, I. A. Guzei, A. L. Rheingold, J. S. Merola and
H. W. Gibson, J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 7634–7639; (b) P.-N. Cheng,
P.-Y. Huang, W.-S. Li, S.-H. Ueng, W.-C. Hung, Y.-H. Liu, C.-C. Lai,
Y. Wang, S.-M. Peng, I. Chao and S.-H. Chiu, J. Org. Chem., 2006, 71,
2372–2383.
better the role of hydrogen bonding in such reactions, a couple of
control experiments were conducted. When the N-Boc protected
azide 7 was used instead of 5-H?PF6 and subjected to the same
reaction conditions, no alkylated product was detected. In another
experiment where MeCN was used to suppress hydrogen bonding
interactions, no triazolium 9?PF6 was formed either. These results
clearly indicated that the 1,2,3-triazole was not reactive when
hydrogen bonding was unavailable, thus proving the key role of
hydrogen bonding in order for the triazole alkylation to happen.
Based on these results, a proposed reaction pathway was
depicted in Scheme 2. The face-to-face hydrogen bonding
interactions between MC1 and the ammonium salt 5-H?PF6
brings the triazole and the ethoxy unit in phosphorimidate to close
proximity. Such spatial arrangement facilitates a nucleophilic
attack of the long pair of the triazole N atom towards the ethyl
group to furnish an alkylated product while generating a
phosphoramidate as the leaving group.
7 S. J. Cantrill, D. A. Fulton, A. M. Heiss, A. R. Pease, J. F. Stoddart,
A. J. P. White and D. J. Williams, Chem.–Eur. J., 2000, 6, 2274–2287.
8 (a) H. C. Kolb, M. G. Finn and K. B. Sharpless, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed., 2001, 40, 2004–2021; (b) V. V. Rostovtsev, L. G. Green, V. V. Fokin
and K. B. Sharpless, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 2596–2599.
9 (a) T. R. Chan, R. Hilgraf, K. B. Sharpless and V. V. Folkin, Org. Lett.,
2004, 6, 2853–2587; (b) Y. Li, J. C. Huffman and A. H. Flood, Chem.
Commun., 2007, 2692–2694.
The proposed reaction pathway of the triazolium formation was
also supported by molecular modeling results (Fig. 3). The
intermediate 8-H?PF6 was constructed using MOE200617 and
optimized with MMFF94x force field implemented in MOE. The
+
…
resulting structure suggested that intermolecular [N –H N]
10 Crown ethers having less than 24 atoms in their macrorings were
reported to form complexes with secondary dialkylammonium ions in a
face-to-face manner. See: (a) J. C. Metcalfe, J. F. Stoddart and G. Jones,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1977, 99, 8317–8319; (b) S. S. Abed-Ali, B. J. Brisdon
and R. England, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1987, 1565–1566.
11 B. A. Arbuzov, Pure Appl. Chem., 1964, 9, 307–335.
12 The binding constant was determined using WinEQNMR program. For
a discussion of its application in determining binding constant, see:
M. J. Hayes, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1993, 311–312.
13 The binding constants were measured to be 50 ¡ 20 M21 and 120 ¡
80 M21 for MC3/6-H?PF6 and MC3/5-H?PF6, respectively.
14 W.-C. Huang, K.-S. Liao, Y.-H. Liu, S.-M. Peng and S.-H. Chiu,
Org. Lett., 2004, 6, 4183–4186.
hydrogen bondings could be formed between one of the triazole
+
…
units and the ammonium center. [N –H O] interaction was also
seen between the ammonium center and one of the amide carbonyl
groups on the macrocycle.18 Meanwhile, N3 of another triazole
unit could be placed in an appropriate position where SN2 attack
of the electron deficient ethoxy carbon atom on the phosphor-
imidate was ready to occur.
In summary, macrocycles containing 1,2,3-triazoles were shown
to recognize secondary dibenzylammonium ions in a face-to-face
manner rather than a threaded one. Moreover, such supramole-
cular interactions were shown to be responsible for the enhanced
reactivity of one of the 1,2,3-triazole units in the macrocyclic host.
To the best of our knowledge, covalent modification of the host
modulated by noncovalent interactions was not seen before in the
related classical crown ether/ammonium host–guest systems, and is
reminiscent of the enzymatic action in biological processes. Such
findings may have an impact on the application of the popular
15 10-H?PF6 could not be isolated from the reaction mixture although
its presence was clearly confirmed by a prominent m/z peak at 419.2
in electrospray ionization mass spectrometry, corresponding to
[M 2 PF6]+. The spectrum was included in ESI{.
16 See ESI{ for the synthetic details and characterization data.
17 MOE2006 is a product of Chemical Computing Group, Montreal,
Canada.
…
18 Intramolecular [N–H O] interaction was also seen between one of the
amide NH groups and a naphthanolic oxygen in the macrocycle.
This journal is ß The Royal Society of Chemistry 2007
Chem. Commun., 2007, 4773–4775 | 4775