W. Yao et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18 (2008) 159–163
161
abated the MMP-2 selectivity. The 3,5-dimethyl deriva-
tive 12 exhibited a substantial gain in selectivity toward
MMP-2 (>5-fold) and MMP-9 (17-fold) in comparison
to the unsubstituted parent phenyl compound 5; albeit
with a concomitant loss in HER-2 sheddase potency.
responding piperazine analog 20 was prepared and
was found to be inactive against both HER-2 shed-
dase and MMP-2, which may imply that the tetrahy-
dropyridine and piperazine ring systems have subtle
conformational differences that must orient the at-
tached phenyl ring and thus the 3-isopropyl group
slightly differently within the narrow S10 pocket.
Our previously disclosed exploratory studies indicated
that placement of an electron withdrawing group
(EWG) in the 4-position of the P10 aromatic ring may
lead to a cogent increase in potency.4b Therefore, a cya-
no group was placed in the 4-position of the MMP-
selective 3-isopropyl analog 10 and the 3,5-dimethyl-
phenyl tetrahydropyridine analog 12 in an effort to
boost the potency while maintaining the selectivity.
The 4-cyano-3-isopropyl-phenyl analog 13 was found
to be less potent than 10 in both the enzymatic
ADAM-10 and cellular HER-2 assays. In contrast, the
4-cyano-3,5-dimethyl-phenyl analog 13 was 3-fold more
potent than 12 in the enzymatic ADAM-10 binding as-
say and retained the excellent selectivity against other
MMPs; despite a slight loss in cellular HER-2 potency.
To further explore the role of the P10 heterocycle in ori-
enting the aryl ring within the S10 pocket, the 3-methyl
and 3-isopropyl-phenyl piperidine compounds 21 and
22 were prepared. The 3-methyl analog 21 was found
to be only slightly more selective than the unsubstituted
parent phenyl piperidine compound 6 against MMP-2
and was 5-fold less selective against MMP-9. In con-
trast, the 3-isopropyl analog 22 displayed an 80-fold
improvement in selectivity toward MMP-2 in compari-
son to 6 and a 19-fold accession in ADAM-10 potency.
Comparison of the piperidine compound 22 to the tetra-
hydropyridine analog 10 indicates a 4-fold increase in
ADAM-10 potency and a 6-fold increase in selectivity
toward MMP-2. The improved binding profile of 22
may be a manifestation of a distortion in the dihedral
angle between the P10 heterocyclic ring and the aromatic
ring, as previously mentioned.
Alternatively, the aryl ring of the 3,5-dimethyl-phenyl
tetrahydropyridine analog 12 was made electron defi-
cient by directly substituting the methyl groups for
EWGs. Thus, the 3,5-difluoro-derivative 15 was pre-
pared and found to have the desired increase in potency
in comparison to 12; however, the selectivity against
MMP-2 was abrogated. The slightly larger 3,5-di-
chloro-phenyl derivative 16 showed diminutive MMP-
2 binding and HER-2 activity, possibly indicating that
the outer limits of the spatial diameter within the S10
pocket were reached. Overall, these results imply that
the electronic disposition of the aromatic ring does not
play as crucial a role in determining the binding proper-
ties for the tetrahydropyridine series as for the previ-
ously published piperazine series.4b This is in
agreement with the initial proposed hypothesis that the
role of the EWG in the piperazine series is to promote
coplanarity between the piperazine and phenyl rings
by facilitating electron donation from the piperazine
nitrogen lone pair to the electron deficient aromatic p-
system.4b For the tetrahydropyridine series, conjugative
factors predispose the P10 heterocycle and aryl ring to be
coplanar; therefore, steric interactions appear to be the
main determinant for the observed metalloprotease
binding affinities for this series.
In summary, excellent selectivity toward MMP-2 and -9
can be achieved by the introduction of a small substitu-
ent at the 3-postion of the P10 phenyl ring. The effect
that the 3-aryl substituent has on the metalloprotease
binding profile is contingent on the P10 heterocycle,
since this predetermines the spatial orientation of the
P10 aryl ring and the appended 3-substituent. Based on
the data, it is plausible that the P10 3-aryl substituent
is occupying the space created by the Ala 223 of
ADAM-10 and is interacting unfavorably with Tyr
223 of MMP-2 and -9, as originally proposed. The 3-iso-
propyl moiety appears to be the optimal group for this
small lipophilic pocket rendering analogs 10 and 22 with
excellent MMP-2 and -9 selectivity. The piperidine ring
emerges as the optimal P10 heterocycle for orienting the
3-isopropyl phenyl moiety within the fastidious S10
pocket. Furthermore, the data suggests that the diame-
ter of the S10 pocket constricts with the following hierar-
chy: HER-2 > MMP-2 > MMP-9.
Previously, it was found that the metalloprotease bind-
ing properties could be attenuated by substitution of
the core scaffold piperidine N–H.4b It was determined
that simple N-methylation of the core nitrogen of com-
pounds 4 and 5 resulted in a 2-fold loss in potency in the
enzymatic ADAM-10 assay and a 4- and 9-fold loss in
HER-2 cellular potency, respectively. Installation of a
methyl carbamate to the core nitrogen of 5 had a similar
effect on the binding profile; however, the pharmacoki-
netic properties of the carbamate were superior to the
parent N–H compound 5. In an effort to further explore
the SAR of the P20 group, a series of scaffold N-substi-
tuted analogs were prepared and the results are depicted
in Table 2.
This hypothesis was further explored by preparing a
series of 3-aryl substituted piperazine compounds (Ta-
ble 1, compounds 17–20). The 3-methyl aryl pipera-
zine analog 17 had a higher binding affinity toward
MMP-2 than HER-2 sheddase. Efforts to modify the
torsion angle between the phenyl and piperazine rings
in a favorable manner, as previously discussed, by the
addition of a cyano group in the 4-position to afford
analog 18 afforded another potent MMP-2 inhibitor.
Replacement of the methyl group of 17 with an
EWG to afford the 3-Cl analog 19 resulted in a nota-
ble gain in HER-2 potency, which was inconsequential
due to a lack of MMP-2 selectivity. Based on the
encouraging MMP-2 selectivity of the 4-(3-iso-pro-
pyl-phenyl)tetrahydro-pyridine compound 10, the cor-
Comparison of the phenyl-tetrahydropyridine N-carba-
mates 23, 24, and 25 to their parent N–H compound 5 re-