4018 J ournal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1998, Vol. 41, No. 21
Dimmock et al.
133. 4d : 0.04:0.03, 42, 53, 118-120. 4e: 0.04:0.03, 42, 63,
119-121. 7: 0.05:0.05, 48, 61, 160-162. The 1H NMR (500
MHz) spectra of representative compounds were as follows.
1e: δ(CDCl3) 7.64 (1H, d, CH)CHCO, J ) 16.2 Hz), 7.51 (2H,
d, 2,6 aryl H, J ) 8.8 Hz), 6.90 (2H, d, 3,5 aryl H, J ) 8.8 Hz),
6.62 (1H, d, CHdCHCO, J ) 16.1 Hz), 3.83 (3H, s, OCH3),
3.43 (2H, def t, COCH2), 3.35 [2H, def t, CH2N(C2H5)2], 3.10
[def q, 4H, CH2N(CH2CH3)2, J ) 7.1 Hz], 1.39 [6H, t,
N(CH2CH3)2, J ) 7.4 Hz]. 4e: δ(CDCl3) 7.98 (2H, d, 2,6 aryl
H, J ) 8.9 Hz), 6.92 (2H, d, 3,5 aryl H, J ) 8.9 Hz), 3.86 (3H,
s, OCH3), 3.70 (2H, t, COCH2, J ) 7.3 Hz), 3.42 [2H, t, CH2N-
(C2H5)2, J ) 7.3 Hz], 3.12 [4H, def q, N(CH2,CH3)2, J ) 7.1],
1.40 (6H, t, 2 CH3, J ) 7.3 Hz).
extracts were combined and dried (anhydrous magnesium
sulfate), and removal of the solvent gave a residue which was
dissolved in anhydrous ether (100 mL). Excess of dry hydro-
gen bromide was passed into the ethereal solution at 0 °C,
and the precipitate was collected, washed with anhydrous
ether and chilled ethanol, and dried. The reaction products
were recrystallized from 2-propanol to give the hydrobromide
salts of the free bases from the following compounds: 11a , mp
183-184 °C; 11c, mp 182-184 °C; 11e, mp 176-178 °C. The
free bases of 11b,d were obtained using the method described
for the preparation of series 10 and 12 vide infra. Addition of
dry hydrogen bromide gas to an ice-cooled solution of the
Mannich base (0.001 mol) in ether (50 mL) led to precipitates
which were collected, dried, and recrystallized from 2-propanol
to give 11b, mp 196-198 °C, or from ether-methanol leading
to 11d , mp 192-194 °C.
Syn th esis of 10a ,c,d a n d Ser ies 12. A stirring solution
of the piperidinols 9a ,c,d and 11a -e (0.001 mol) in aqueous
methanol (20% v/v, 25 mL) was cooled and maintained at less
than 10 °C while basified with aqueous sodium bicarbonate
solution (10% w/v). The mixture was extracted with ether (5
× 25 mL) and dried (anhydrous magnesium sulfate). Removal
of the solvent under vaccuum gave an oil which was dissolved
in anhydrous ether (50 mL) to which was added a 2.0 M
solution of methyl bromide (0.01 mol) in tertiary butyl methyl
ether at 0 °C. The reaction mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 6
h. The precipitates were collected, washed with dry ether,
dried, and recrystallized from ethanol (95% v/v, 10a ,d ) or
ether-methanol (10c, 12a -e). The yields (%) and melting
points (°C) were as follows. 10a : 77, 178-179. 10c: 70, 202-
204. 10d : 78, 222-224. 12a : 86, 192-194. 12b: 73, 164-
166. 12c: 79, 168-170. 12d : 80, 152-154. 12e: 76, 188-
190. TLC of the reaction products obtained in a similar
manner from 9b,e revealed the presence of an impurity.
Recrystallization and column chromatography did not lead to
the isolation of a pure compound.
The methiodide of the free base of 12d was prepared in an
identical manner except methyl iodide was used in place of
methyl bromide and the reaction mixture was stirred at 0 °C
overnight. The precipitate was collected and recrystallized
from alcohol (95%) to give the desired compound, mp 177-
178 °C, in 85% yield.
X-r a y Cr ysta llogr a p h y of 10d . Compound 10d was
recrystallized from diethyl ether-methanol by vapor diffusion.
A Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer with a ω scan was used for
data collection, and the structure was solved by direct methods
using NRCVAX34 and refined using SHELX93.35 Atomic
scattering factors were taken from the literature.36 All non-
hydrogen atoms were found on the E-map and refined aniso-
tropically. Hydrogen atom positions were calculated and not
refined.
Utilization of a literature procedure for preparing a series
of 3-dimethylamino-1-aryl-1-propanone hydrobromides3 led to
the synthesis of the hydrobromide salt of the free base of 4a
in 15% yield. It was recrystallized from acetone-methanol,
mp 104-107 °C.
Syn th esis of Ser ies 8, 9, 11, a n d 13. A mixture of the
4-aryl-3-buten-2-one or 1-aryl-1-ethanone, paraformaldehyde,
piperazine dihydrochloride (8a ,b), ethylamine hydrochloride
(9a -e, 11a -c,e,f, 13a ,b), or ethylamine hydrobromide (11d ),
hydrochloric acid (37% w/v, 0.04 mL; 8b, 9a -e, 11b,c, 13a ,b)
or trifluoroacetic acid (0.04 mL; 11a ,d ,e) (3 mL; 11f) in
acetonitrile (100 mL; 8a , 11a ,d ,e,), and ethanol (95% v/v, 100
mL; 8b, 9a -e, 13a ,b) or 2-propanol (100 mL; 11b,c,f) was
heated under reflux for varying lengths of time. In the case
of 11b, the product which deposited from the reaction mixture
was collected and washed with 2-propanol. For the other
compounds, the solvent was removed in vacuo leading to oils
which were washed with ether and dissolved in ethanol (10
mL) to which ether was added to induce precipitation. After
refrigerating the solution at 4 °C for 2-3 days, the deposited
solids were collected and recrystallized from 60% ethanol (8a ),
70% ethanol (8b), 95% ethanol (9a ,c, 11a ,b), ether-methanol
(9b,d ,e, 11d ,e, 13b), or methanol (11c,f, 13a ). A constant
quantity of amine hydrohalide was used (0.01 mol). The molar
ratios of ketone to paraformaldehyde, times of heating (h),
yields (%), and melting points (°C) were as follows. 8a : 0.04:
0.03, 4, 61, 234 dec. 8b: 0.06:0.06, 17, 41, 198 dec. 9a : 0.06:
0.04, 36, 57, 194-196. 9b: 0.06:0.04, 30, 24, 210-212. 9c:
0.08:0.08, 24, 63, 192-194. 9d : 0.06:0.04, 42, 21, 190-192.
9e: 0.05:0.05, 45, 25, 180-182. 11a : 0.04:0.04, 20, 47, 208-
210. 11b: 0.03:0.025, 48, 71, 202-203. 11c: 0.03:0.025, 24,
70, 185-187. 11d : 0.04:0.04, 20, 50, 198-200. 11e: 0.04:
0.04, 48, 56, 178-179. 11f: 0.05:0.05, 48, 51, 178-180. 13a :
0.06:0.04, 36, 30, 164-166. 13b: 0.06:0.04, 72, 28, 172-174.
The 1H NMR (500 MHz) spectra of two representative com-
pounds (9e and 11e) are given below. In the case of 9e, the
aryl rings adjacent to carbon atoms C1 and C4 (Figure 4) are
referred to as aryl A and aryl B, respectively. 9e: δ(CDCl3)
8.05 (1H, d, CHdCHCO, J ) 16.3 Hz), 7.59 (2H, d, 2,6 aryl A
H, J ) 8.8 Hz), 7.21 (2H, d, 2,6 aryl B H, J ) 8.8 Hz), 6.89
(2H, d, 3,5 aryl A H, J ) 8.8 Hz), 6.77 (2H, d, 3,5 aryl B H, J
) 8.8 Hz), 6.63 (1H, d, CHdCH aryl B, J ) 15.9 Hz), 6.53
(1H, d, CHdCHCO, J ) 16.3 Hz), 6.07 (1H, d, CHdCH aryl
B, J ) 15.9 Hz), 4.67 (1H, br d, OH, J ) 1.5 Hz), 4.51 (1H, br
d, C3Ha, J ) 8.3 Hz), 3.83 (3H, s, aryl A OCH3), 3.75 (3H, s,
aryl A OCH3), 3.34-3.41 (2H, m, C2He, C6He), 3.00-3.25 (4H,
m, C2Ha, C6Ha, N-CH2CH3), 2.43-2.53 (1H, m, C5Ha), 1.86
(1H, d, C5He, J ) 14.7 Hz), 1.48 (3H, t, CH2CH3, J ) 7.3 Hz).
11e: δ(CDCl3) 8.12 (2H, d, 2,6 aroyl H, J ) 8.9 Hz), 7.42 (2H,
def d, 2,6 aryl H, J ) 8.8 Hz), 6.91 (2H, def d, 3,5 aroyl H, J
) 9.0 Hz), 6.74 (2H, def d, 3,5 aryl H, J ) 8.8 Hz), 5.50 (1H,
dd, C3Ha, J 3a/2a ) 12.1 Hz, J 3a/2e ) 3.6 Hz), 5.24 (1H, d, OH, J
) 2.6 Hz), 3.83 (3H, s, aroyl OCH3), 3.68 (3H, s, aryl OCH3),
3.41-3.48 (2H, m, C2He, C6He), 3.29-3.39 (2H, m, C2Ha,
C6Ha), 3.04-3.18 (2H, m, NCH2CH3), 2.74-2.83 (1H, m,
C5Ha), 1.92 (1H, br d, C5He, J ) 14.9 Hz), 1.50 (3H, t,
NCH2CH3, J ) 7.3 Hz).
The data for 10d were as follows:
C27H33BrNO2, Mr )
483.45; a ) 8.0240(9), b ) 10.253(2), c ) 15.594(5) Å; R )
74.398(23)°, â ) 83.549(16)°, γ ) 86.847(14)°; Z ) 2; space
group ) P1, triclinic; Dx ) 1.308 g cm-3, λ(Mo KR) ) 0.7093
Å; T ) 123 K. Merging R is based on intensities of 0.015 for
447 replicate reflections. Refinement on F2: R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] )
0.0598 (2951 reflections), wR(F2) ) 0.1797 (all data), S ) 1.52.
A total of 4790 reflections were measured of which 4343 were
independent and used in the refinement of the structure.
Parameters refined ) 280, [w ) 1[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1222P)2
+
2
0.000P], where P ) (Fo + 2Fc2)/3. ∆F in the final difference
map within +2.094 and -0.469 eÅ-3
.
Ca lcu la tion s of Atom ic Ch a r ges. The molecular confor-
mations were optimized using the semiempirical AM1 method.
The electrostatic potential-derived charges were calculated
using the CHELPG scheme at the RHF/3-21G level (restricted
Hartree-Fock method with the 3-21G standard basis set). All
computations were carried out using the Gaussian 92 pro-
gram.37
The hydrobromide salts of the free bases from 11a ,c,e were
prepared as follows. A solution of 11a ,c,e (0.01 mol) in water
(50 mL) was basified with sodium bicarbonate solution (10%
w/v) and extracted with ether (5 × 25 mL). The organic
B. Bioeva lu a tion . Cytotoxicity Assa ys. Evaluation of
the compounds using P388 D1 cells was undertaken by a
literature procedure,38 and the examination with L1210 cells
was achieved using a previously reported method.39 The assay