2092
A. S. Florjancic et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18 (2008) 2089–2092
8. Collo, G.; Neidhart, S.; Kawashima, E.; Kosco-Vibois,
M.; North, R. A.; Buell, G. Neuropharmacology 1997, 36, :
1277.
´
9. Papp, L.; Vizi, E. S.; Sperlagh, B. Neuroreport 2004, 15,
2387.
10. Labasi, J. M.; Petrushova, N.; Donovan, C.; McCurdy, S.;
Lira, P.; Payette, M. M.; Brissette, W.; Wicks, J. R.;
Audoly, L.; Gabel, C. A. J. Immunol. 2002, 168, 6436.
11. Chessell, I. P.; Hatcher, J. P.; Bountra, C.; Michel, A. D.;
Hughes, J. P.; Green, P.; Egerton, J.; Murfin, M.;
Richardson, J.; Peck, W. L.; Grahames, C. B. A.; Casula,
M. A.; Yiangou, Y.; Birch, R.; Anand, P.; Buell, G. N.
Pain 2005, 114, 386.
actions at hP2X7 beyond that afforded by relatively sim-
ple substituents such as methyl and methoxy. At rP2X7,
however, the two regioisomeric aminotriazoles appear
to diverge somewhat with regard to the preferred substi-
tutions in this part of the pharmacophore. A narrower
range of substituents in the 5-amino-1-phenyl-1,2,4-tria-
zole regioisomer displayed enhanced rP2X7 potency
compared to the 3-amino-4-phenyl-1,2,4-triazole regio-
isomer. Whereas in the former case amino substitution
(e.g., 29 and 30) met this criteria, in the latter case some-
what greater flexibility was observed with amino (37),
aryl (38) and arylether (40) groups all having enhanced
rP2X7 activity. The sulfone 22 also showed enhanced
rP2X7 potency, however this substitution was not inves-
tigated in both regioisomers. A generally more balanced
activity across species is clearly a desirable feature of this
subgroup of compounds that is shared by few other
P2X7 antagonists.14,20
13. Nelson, D. W.; Gregg, R. J.; Kort, M. E.; Perez-Medrano,
A.; Voight, E. A.; Wang, Y.; Grayson, G.; Namovic, M.
T.; Donnelly-Roberts, D. L.; Niforatos, W.; Honore, P.;
Jarvis, M. F.; Faltynek, C. R.; Carroll, W. A. J. Med.
Chem. 2006, 49, 3659.
14. Carroll, W. A.; Kalvin, D. M.; Perez Medrano, A.;
Florjancic, A. S.; Wang, Y.; Donnelly-Roberts, D. L.;
Namovic, M. T.; Grayson, G.; Honore, P.; Jarvis, M. F.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 4044.
15. Nagarajan, K.; Talwalker, P. K.; Kulkarni, C. L.; Ven-
kateswarlu, A.; Prabhu, S. S.; Nayak, G. V. Ind. J. Chem.
Sect. B 1984, 12, 1243.
16. X-Ray crystal analysis verified that the bromination
occurred exclusively at the 5-position of the triazole
ring.
17. Honore, P. M.; Donnelly-Roberts, D.; Namovic, M.;
Hsieh, G.; Zhu, C.; Mikusa, J.; Hernandez, G.; Zhong, C.;
Gauvin, D.; Chandran, P.; Harris, R.; Perez-Medrano, A.;
Carroll, W.; Marsh, K.; Sullivan, J.; Faltynek, C.; Jarvis,
M. F. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2006, 319, 1376.
18. For 1-(2,3-dichlorophenyl)-5-(o-tolyloxy)-1H-1,2,4-tria-
zole: hP2X7 pIC50 = 5.8; rP2X7 pIC50 = 5.6.
In summary, a new series of potent and selective21
aminotriazole P2X7 antagonists has been discovered.
These studies have provided us with a wider under-
standing of the overall P2X7 pharmacophore by
expanding the diversity of linkers as well as substitu-
tions on the right hand aromatic group. The aminotri-
azole analogs described herein were found to possess
enhanced potency relative to earlier P2X7 triazoles.
Additionally, structural features were uncovered that
confer potent activity at both the human and rat
P2X7 receptors.
References and notes
19. Compounds 41 and 42 were prepared via the correspond-
ing Boc-protected homopiperazine intermediate that was
deprotected and alkylated with the appropriate alkylating
agent.
1. DiVirgilio, F.; Vishwanath, V.; Ferrari, D. Handb. Exp.
Pharmacol. 2001, 151, 355.
2. Baraldi, P. G.; DiVirgilio, F.; Romagnoli, R. Curr. Top.
Med. Chem. 2004, 4, 1707.
20. Furber, M.; Alcaraz, L.; Bent, J. E.; Beyerbach, A.;
Bowers, K.; Braddock, M.; Caffrey, M. V.; Cladingboel,
D.; Collington, J.; Donald, D. K.; Fagura, M.; Ince, F.;
Kinchin, E. C.; Laurent, C.; Lawson, M.; Luker, T. J.;
Mortimore, M. M. P.; Pimm, A. D.; Riley, R. J.; Roberts,
N.; Robertson, M.; Theaker, J.; Thorne, P. V.; Weaver,
R.; Webborn, P.; Willis, P. J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 5882.
21. Compounds 22–23, 25, 29, 30, and 33 were inactive at
P2X1, P2X2, P2X2/3, P2X4, P2Y1, and P2Y2 receptors at
10 lM.
3. Romagnoli, R.; Baraldi, P. G.; DiVirgilio, F. Expert Opin.
Ther. Patents 2005, 15, 271.
4. Gunosewoyo, H.; Coster, M. J.; Kassiou, M. Curr. Med.
Chem. 2007, 14, 1505.
5. Donnelly-Roberts, D. L.; Jarvis, M. F. Br. J. Pharmacol.
2007, 151, 571.
6. Sim, J. A.; Young, M. T.; Sung, H.-Y.; North, R. A.;
Surprenant, A. J. Neurosci. 2004, 24, 6307.
7. Anderson, C. M.; Nedergaard, M. Trends Neurosci. 2006,
29, 257.