1766
YURCHENKO et al.
factor for IX and X being as low as 3.4 and 1.8,
respectively.
A comparison of the protective effects of com-
pounds I, III, and V and the corresponding nitro
derivatives II, IV, and XI demonstrated that introduc-
tion of an NO group into the para position of the
2
benzene ring makes their inhibiting action weaker.
Since the nitro group is a much stronger electron
acceptor than a bromine or chlorine atom, it would be
expected that the protective properties should be com-
pletely eliminated on replacing these atoms with a
nitro group. However, it was found that such a re-
placement not only fails to make the hindrance factor
lower, but even raises it substantially. For example,
the corrosion hindrance factor for XI is 9.7.
T, C
Fig. 1. Hindrance factor vs. temperature T in corrosion of
08KP steel in a 3 M solution of H SO in the presence of
2
4
2
1
10
M phenacylmethylpyridinium bromides. Com-
pound: (1) VIII, (2) VII, (3) VI, (4) III, (5) V, (6) I, and
(7) XI.
Variation of the substituents R revealed for com-
pounds V, VII, IX, and X at 20 and 40 C a correla-
1
tion between their
correlation coefficients equal to, respectively, 0.998
and 0.990. The exception are compounds VIII and
XI. Possibly, the substituents R in these compounds
are involved, in addition to exerting influence on the
carbonyl group and the system of the benzene ring,
in some other processes. For VIII, this may be, e.g.,
independent involvement of the MeO group in the free
or protonated form in adsorption, whereas in XI, as
also in II and IV, the observed corrosion hindrance,
probably, results from the combined influence exerted
on corrosion both by these compounds themselves and
by the corresponding amino compounds, which could
be formed under the experimental conditions.
constants and values, with the
0
1
It should be noted that the linear dependence
,
c
observed for compounds I, III, V, and VI, is also
preserved at 40 C, but the correlation coefficient falls
in this case to 0.985. At 60 C, the inhibiting action
1
of the compounds studied increases dramatically
0
(Table 1), but the
relationship is strongly dis-
c
turbed, being completely eliminated at 80 C. Possi-
bly, raising the temperature leads to manifestation in
the corrosion process of a number of other factors.
This may be, e.g., reorientation of molecules bound to
the metal surface via the system of the pyridinium
moiety, enhancement of the role played by electrostat-
ic interaction of pyridinium cations with the metal
surface, and increasing share of the specific adsorption
of compounds via the carbonyl group.
The results of the corrosion tests demonstrated that,
with the temperature increasing to 60 C, the inhibiting
action of most of the compounds studied increases
substantially (Table 1) and remains rather high at
80 C. The observed temperature dependence of the
inhibiting effect of the compounds studied (Fig. 1) is
probably associated with a change in the mechanism
of their adsorption onto the metal and a transition
from physical (or first-order specific) adsorption to
chemisorption as a result of the enhanced donor
acceptor interaction between the carbonyl oxygen and
d levels of iron. A certain decrease in the inhibiting
action of some compounds at 80 C is possibly due to
desorption of inhibitors from the metal surface, result-
ing from the high rate of metal dissolution at this
temperature.
As is known [1, 2], the corrosion hindrance under
the action of carbonyl compounds is mainly due to
involvement of the oxygen from the carbonyl group in
adsorption processes because of the presence of a sub-
stantial electron density on this atom. Electron-donor
substituents make higher the nucleophilicity of
the oxygen atom of the carbonyl group, thereby
enhancing the donor acceptor interaction of carbonyl
compounds with the metal surface, whereas electron-
acceptor substituents passivating the carbonyl group
make this interaction weaker. Introduction into the
para position of the benzene ring of V of CH or
CH O groups, which exhibit electron-donor effect,
3
3
enhances the protective action of the inhibitor, with
the result that the corrosion hindrance factor increases
to 26.5 and 32.0 for VII and VIII, respectively, at
20 C. If these substituents are replaced with a brom-
ine or chlorine atom, the corrosion-protective effect
decreases dramatically, with the corrosion hindrance
Voltammetric measurements on steel in the pres-
ence of compounds V, VIII, and XI demonstrated that
these compounds are inhibitors of mixed type, which
inhibit both the cathodic and anodic reactions of the
corrosion (Fig. 2). Under stationary conditions, they
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED CHEMISTRY Vol. 76 No. 11 2003