Table 1. Screening Conditions for Reaction of 2a with Indole
3aa
Figure 1. Structure of 2-(1-alkynyl)arylaldimine 1 and 2-(2-
(alkynyl)benzylidene)malonate 2.
or base-controlled conditions, thus offering an unprecedented
and straightforward route for the synthesis of (Z)-1-ben-
zylidene-3-(1H-indol-1-yl)-1H-indene-2,2(3H)-dicarboxy-
late or 3-((1H-indol-3-yl)(2-(alkynyl) aryl)methyl)-1H-indole.
Because the indole skeleton is an important substructure
in both natural products and therapeutic agents,4 at the
beginning a set of experiments was carried out using diethyl
2-(2-(2-phenylethynyl)benzylidene)malonate 2a and indole
3a as model substrates. This preliminary survey, carried out
in the presence of a Lewis acid as the catalyst, allowed us
to evaluate and optimize the most efficient catalytic system.
In an initial experiment, the reaction was performed in
acetonitrile at room temperature catalyzed by Yb(OTf)3
(Table 1, entry 1). The generated product was the normal
Michael addition adduct 4a (53% yield). A similar result
was obtained when the catalyst was replaced by Dy(OTf)3
or Sc(OTf)3 (Table 1, entries 2 and 8). This normal Michael
addtion reaction is well-established in the literature.5 No
reaction occurred or only a trace amount of product was
detected when other Lewis acids (LiClO4, Mg(ClO4)2, ZnCl2,
YbCl3, CAN) were utilized as catalyst (Table 1, entries 3-7).
Interestingly, compound 5a was formed when the reaction
was performed at 50 or 70 °C catalyzed by Sc(OTf)3 or
Yb(OTf)3 (Table 1, entries 9 and 10). The alkynyl group in
the substrate is not a specific factor for the outcome of double
addition. The same outcome was observed with the parent
benzylidenemalonate. It seems that the difference for genera-
tion of compound 4a or 5a depends on the temperature
employed. Further investigation revealed that the tandem
addition-cyclization could occur via 5-exo-cyclization6 when
t-BuOK was added as a base in the Yb(OTf)3-catalyzed
reaction (Table 1, entry 11). The corresponding product was
afforded in 77% yield, and the structure was verified as 6a
by 1H and 13C NMR, mass spectroscopy, and X-ray diffrac-
tion analysis (see Supporting Information). The yield could
temp time
yield
(%)b
entry Lewis acid
base
solvent
(°C)
(h)
1
2
3
Yb(OTf)3
Dy(OTf)3
LiClO4
MeCN
MeCN
MeCN
MeCN
MeCN
MeCN
MeCN
MeCN
MeCN
MeCN
MeCN
MeCN
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
50
70
25
25
60
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
70
72
24
24
24
24
24
24
5
48
20
24
48
24
24
24
24
7
53 (4a)
71 (4a)
NR
NR
NR
4
5
Mg(ClO4)2
ZnCl2
6
YbCl3
trace
trace
7
CAN
8
9
Sc(OTf)3
Sc(OTf)3
Yb(OTf)3
Yb(OTf)3
Yb(OTf)3
Yb(OTf)3
Yb(OTf)3
Yb(OTf)3
Yb(OTf)3
AgOTf
87 (4a)
99 (5a)
80 (5a)
77 (6a)
NR
85 (6a)
NR
NR
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27c
tBuOK
K2CO3
Cs2CO3 MeCN
NaH
Et3N
iPr2NEt MeCN
tBuOK
tBuOK
tBuOK
MeCN
MeCN
NR
MeCN
MeCN
MeCN
MeCN
MeCN
tBuOH
DCE
THF
toluene
DMF
61 (6a)
63 (6a)
63 (6a)
85 (6a)
76 (6a)
17 (6a)
trace
trace
trace
70 (6a)
97 (6a)
CuI
FeCl3
Mg(ClO4)2 tBuOK
tBuOK
7
7
24
24
48
48
48
24
9
tBuOK
tBuOK
tBuOK
tBuOK
tBuOK
tBuOK
MeCN
a Reaction conditions: 2-(2-(alkynyl)benzylidene)malonate 2a (0.3
mmol), indole 3a (0.33 mmol, 1.1 equiv), Lewis acid (10 mol %), base
(1.0 equiv). b Isolated yield based on 2-(2-(alkynyl)benzylidene)malonate
2a. c Reaction conditions: 2-(2-(alkynyl)benzylidene)malonate 2a (0.3
mmol), indole 3a (0.25 mmol), base (1.0 equiv). Isolated yield based on
indole 3a.
(3) (a) Ding, Q.; Wu, J. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 4959–4962. (b) Gao, K.;
Wu, J. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 8611–8613. (c) Sun, W.; Ding, Q.; Sun,
X.; Fan, R.; Wu, J. J. Comb. Chem. 2007, 9, 690–694.
be increased to 85% when the base was changed to Cs2CO3,
although prolonged reaction time was needed (48 h, Table
1, entry 13). However, no product was detected when other
(4) (a) Saxton, J. E. Nat. Prod. Rep. 1997, 14, 559–590. (b) Toyota,
M.; Ihara, N. Nat. Prod. Rep. 1998, 15, 327–340.
(5) (a) Evans, D. A.; Scheidt, K. A.; Fandrick, K. R.; Lam, H. W.; Wu,
J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 10780–10781. (b) Lewis Acids in Organic
Synthesis; Yamamoto, H., Ed.; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH: Weinheim, 2000.
(6) For selected examples, see: (a) Martinez, I.; Alford, P. E.; Ovaska,
T. V. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 1133–1135. (b) Bailey, W. F.; Longstaff, S. C. J.
Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 432–433. (c) Duan, X.-H.; Guo, L.-N.; Bi, H.-P.;
Liu, X.-Y.; Liang, Y.-M. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 5777–5780. (d) Bi, H.-P.; Guo,
L.-N.; Duan, X.-H.; Gou, F.-R.; Huang, S.-H.; Liu, X.-Y.; Liang, Y.-M.
Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 397–400. (e) Guo, L.-N.; Duan, X.-H.; Bi, H.-P.; Liu,
X.-Y.; Liang, Y.-M. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 1538–1540. (f) Guo, L.-N.;
Duan, X.-H.; Bi, H.-P.; Liu, X.-Y.; Liang, Y.-M. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71,
3325–3327. (g) Bi, H.-P.; Liu, X.-Y.; Gou, F.-R.; Guo, L.-N.; Duan, X.-
H.; Liang, Y.-M. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 3527–3529.
i
bases (K2CO3, NaH, Et3N, Pr2NEt) were employed (Table
1, entries 12, 14-16). Other Lewis acids (AgOTf, CuI, FeCl3,
Mg(ClO4)2) were also screened in the presence of t-BuOK,
and the desired product 6a was generated in moderate to
good yield (Table 1, entries 17-20). From these results, the
role of the Lewis acid in the reaction was doubted. Thus,
the reaction without adding Lewis acid in the presence of
t-BuOK was examined at room temperature. Surprisingly,
2252
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 11, 2008