C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 1. Scope Study
Subsequent couplings with various nucleophiles offer additional
structural features/complexity. These one-pot, three-component
reactions are proposed to proceed via a key 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition
between Au carbenoid-containing carbonyl ylides and ethyl vinyl
ether.
Acknowledgment. Generous financial supports from ACS PRF
(43905-G1), ORAU and Merck are appreciated. L.Z. thanks Prof.
Vince Catalano for helping with the X-ray structure. The acquisition
of an NMR spectrometer and upgrade of an existing NMR
spectrometer was funded by NSF CHE-0521191, and the X-ray
diffractometer purchase was supported by NSF Grant CHE-
0226402.
a Isolated yield. b Reaction temperature: 40 °C. c TBAF (2 equiv) was
added to complete desilylation. d The [4 + 2] product was isolated at
30%. e The ethoxyenone diastereomers initially formed were isolated in
59% and 12% yield, respectively. f Yield of 12 was 14%.
observed only with dipolarophiles other than ethyl vinyl ether
occurred, and 4-ethoxy-1,3-diphenyl-4,5,6,7-tetrahydroisobenzo-
furan was isolated in 30% yield; moreover, the ethoxyenone
diastereomers initially formed were stable on column, and their
characterization offered support for the structure assignment of 2.
The alkyne terminus could accommodate different substituents
including n-butyl (entry 11), MOM (entry 12) and aryl groups of
electron-rich (entries 9) and electron-deficient (entry 10) well.
Surprisingly, 14% of aldehyde 12 (see eq 5) was isolated in entry
12, which is likely due to the presence of a chelating R-methoxy-
ketone moiety. To our delight, the structure of 8i was elucidated
by X-ray crystallography (Figure 1), confirming our previous
structure assignments. Substrates with a methyl or a phenyl
substitution at the cyclopropane ring, however, did not furnish
expected bicyclo[3.2.0]heptane products. Besides ethyl vinyl ether,
tert-butyl vinyl ether could be used but the reaction was slower.
The formation of aldehyde enone 5 (Scheme 1) suggests that
the ring juncture of 2 proximal to the carbonyl group is highly
susceptible toward nucleophilic attacks and groups other than OH
can be readily installed. Indeed, when MeOH instead of H2O was
used, methyl ether 9 was formed in 93% yield (eq 2). In addition,
a hydride and an allyl group can be readily delivered, yielding
reduced enone 10 (eq 1) and allyl enone 11 (eq 3) in excellent
yields. Moreover, the yield of aldehyde 5 can be improved
dramatically to 81% upon the addition of Me2AlCl (1 equiv) and
extra ethyl vinyl ether. These reactions constitute efficient one-
pot, 3-component couplings, offering rapid excess to highly strained
and functionalized bicyclo[3.2.0]heptanes. Unexpectedly, when
MOM-substituted 7l was treated with PtCl2, aldehyde 12 was
obtained essentially pure without chromatography after acidic
hydrolysis and workup (eq 5). The lack of 8l is interesting and
suggests that PtCl2 is more acidic than IPrAuNTf2 (entry 12).
Compound 12, though sensitive to silica gel, was easily cyclized
under basic conditions to afford delicate tricyclic dienone 13 in
63% yield, demonstrating the synthetic utility of this chemistry.
In summary, we have developed an efficient Au(I)-catalyzed
synthesis of highly strained and functionalized bicyclo[3.2.0]heptanes.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures,
compound characterization data and cif file. This material is available
References
(1) For recent reviews on Au/Pt catalysis, see: (a) Hashmi, A. S. K. Chem.
ReV. 2007, 107, 3180–3211. (b) Fu¨rstner, A.; Davis, P. W. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 3410–3449. (c) Gorin, D. J.; Toste, F. D. Nature 2007,
446, 395–403. (d) Jimenez-Nunez, E.; Echavarren, A. M. Chem. Commun.
2007, 333–346. (e) Zhang, L.; Sun, J.; Kozmin, S. A. AdV. Synth. Catal.
2006, 348, 2271–2296. (f) Ma, S.; Yu, S.; Gu, Z. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2006, 45, 200–203.
(2) For a review, see: (a) Patil, N. T.; Yamamoto, Y. ArkiVoc 2007, V, 6–19.
(3) (a) Kusama, H.; Funami, H.; Takaya, J.; Iwasawa, N. Org. Lett. 2004, 6,
605–608. (b) Kim, N.; Kim, Y.; Park, W.; Sung, D.; Gupta, A. K.; Oh,
C. H. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 5289–5291. (c) Kusama, H.; Miyashita, Y.;
Takaya, J.; Iwasawa, N. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 289–292. (d) Lian, J.-J.; Chen,
P.-C.; Lin, Y.-P.; Ting, H.-C.; Liu, R.-S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128,
11372–11373. (e) Huang, X.; Zhang, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 6398–
6399 For a review, see: (f) Kusama, H.; Iwasawa, N. Chem. Lett. 2006,
35, 1082–1087.
(4) Trillo, B.; Lopez, F.; Gulias, M.; Castedo, L.; Mascarenas, J. L. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 951–954.
(5) The strain energy of parent bicycle[3.2.0]heptane was estimated as 30.48
kcal/mol; for reference, see: Engler, E. M.; Andose, J. D.; Schlever, P. V.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 8005–8025.
(6) (a) Kashiwabara, M.; Kamo, T.; Makabe, H.; Shibata, H.; Hirota, M. Biosci.,
Biotechnol., Biochem. 2006, 70, 1502–1505. (b) Ko¨nig, G. M.; Wright,
A. D. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 3837.
(7) Zhang, J. L.; Schmalz, H. G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 6704–
6707.
(8) 1,3-Bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)imidazol-2-ylidenegold(I) bis(trifluorome-
thanesulfonyl)imide. For its synthesis, see: (a) Ricard, L.; Gagosz, F.
Organometallics 2007, 26, 4704–4707 For its catalysis, see: (b) Li, G.;
Zhang, L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 5156–5159. (c) Li, G.; Zhang,
G.; Zhang, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 3740–3741.
(9) Zhang, G.; Huang, X.; Li, G.; Zhang, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130,
1814–1815.
(10) Without the addition of ethyl vinyl ether, ketone 1 did not undergo
noticeable reaction in the presence of IPrAuNTf2 at room temperature.
However, slow decomposition was observed at 80°C.
(11) Estimation by 1H NMR gave a ratio of 5/1 for the two compounds and a
combined yield of more than 90%.
(12) In our later scope studies, it became apparent that AuCl3 and PtCl2 did not
stay catalytically active in the reaction after 15 to 30 min.
JA802294T
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 22, 2008 6945