Scheme 1. Retrosynthetic Analysis of Aldehyde 2
cross-coupling technology7 to append the known iodide 88
to vinyl triflate 7 was expected to provide access to 6; the
latter in turn was thought to be well suited to ring contraction
via a series of steps designed to deliver cyclopentene 5.
actual alkyl donor in this reaction.15 Another factor essential
to success was the utilization of lithium chloride in order to
mediate the cross-coupling under mild conditions.16,17
Our point of departure entailed the stereoselective epoxi-
dation9 of the readily available carvone derivative 9.10 The
use of m-CPBA afforded a 5:1 mixture of epoxides in near
quantitative yield11 (Scheme 2). The major isomer 10 was
subjected to sucrose-controlled NaBH4 reduction12 (dr )
8:1), and the resultant alcohol 11 was protected with
TBDPSCl to give the corresponding silyl ether 12 in
stereochemically homogeneous form after chromatographic
purification. Oxidative cleavage of the epoxide 12 was
achieved using periodic acid as the only workable conditions
uncovered and formed the desired methyl ketone 13 ac-
companied by a significant amount of unwanted aldehyde
14 which originated from facile [1,2] hydride shift.13 The
requisite vinyl triflate 7 was prepared directly from methyl
ketone 13 using Comins’ reagent in combination with LDA
and HMPA.14
Scheme 2. Preparation of Vinyl Triflate 7
With vinyl triflate 7 in hand, the time had arrived to effect
cross-coupling to the organozinc species 15 as illustrated in
Scheme 3.7 Extensive optimization was necessary to realize
a high yield. Especially critical was the premixing of iodide
88 with ZnCl2 prior to addition of three equivalents of t-BuLi.
This finding implicates the tert-butylzinc species 15 as the
(7) (a) Negishi, E.; Valente, L. F.; Kobayashi, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1980, 102, 3298. (b) Negishi, E. Acc. Chem. Res. 1982, 15, 340. (c) Knochel,
P.; Singer, R. D. Chem. ReV. 1993, 93, 2117.
(8) Heckrodt, T. J.; Mulzer, J. Synthesis 2002, 1857.
(9) Smitt, O.; Ho¨gberg, H.-E. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 7691.
(10) Gabrie¨ls, S.; Haver, D. V.; Vandewalle, M.; Clercq, P. D.; Verstuyf,
A.; Bouillon, R. Chem. Eur. J. 2001, 7, 520.
(11) The stereochemical outcome was not determined. The major isomer
was separated by column chromatography and was used for the subsequent
reduction reaction.
A further central strategic transformation consisted of
contracting the six-membered ring present in 6 into the five-
membered keto aldehyde 5 by adoption of Schreiber’s two-
directional tactic.18 The three discrete operations involved
the bis-dihydroxylation of diene 6,19 ensuing oxidative
cleavage of tetraol 16 to generate 17, and intramolecular aldol
(12) Denis, C.; Laignel, B.; Plusquellec, D.; Le Marouille, J.-Y.; Botrel,
A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 53.
(13) For periodic acid oxidative cleavage, see: Davisson, V. J.; Neal,
T. R.; Poulter, C. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 1235.
(14) (a) Comins, D. L.; Dehghani, A.; Foti, C. J.; Joseph, S. P. Org.
Synth. 1997, 74, 77. (b) Comins, D. L.; Dehghani, A. Tetrahedron Lett.
1992, 33, 6299.
2116
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 11, 2008