acids have appeared in the literature, mostly involving
acylation of hydroxylamines.17 Other known synthetic
pathways to N-arylhydroxamic acids involve oxidation of
arylacyl amides18 and reaction of aromatic nitroso com-
pounds with oxoacids in the presence of thiamine-dependent
enzymes19 or acidic media.20 Herein we report a very simple
and efficient synthesis of N-arylhydroxamic acids by NHC-
catalyzed amidation of aldehydes21 via acyl anion addition
to aryl nitroso compounds.
Scheme 1
.
Prosposed Amidation of Aldehydes Using
Nitrosobenzene
In our preliminary experiments, we found that benzalde-
hyde and nitrosobenzene reacted rapidly in the presence of
the NHC catalyst generated from the triazolium salt 422 and
1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (DBU), forming N-hy-
droxy-N-phenylbenzamide 3a in excellent yields. No forma-
tion of benzoin was observed under these conditions.
Optimization studies using different imidazolium and tria-
zolium salts indicated that sterically less hindered triazolium
salts provided higher yields of the product (Table 1). The
synthetic protocol. In another recent study, Chan and Scheidt
reported the NHC-catalyzed amination of homoenolates using
diazenes.10
Table 1. Catalyst Optimization
Nitroso compounds exhibit a high reactivity of the nitroso
group.11 The polarization of the nitrogen-oxygen bond,
resembling that of the carbon-oxygen bond in a carbonyl
group, results in susceptibility of the nitroso group to
additions of nucleophiles. By exploiting the higher reactivity
of the nitroso group relative to its carbonyl counterpart
toward nucleophilic attack, we envisaged a possibility that
involved reaction of the intermediate ii with nitrosobenzene-
forming hydroxamic acid instead of acyloin.
The chemistry and biochemistry of hydroxamic acids are
well documented. They are strong metal ion chelators12 and
possess extensive pharmacological, toxicological, and patho-
logical properties.13 Some of them are being examined in
human clinical trials as drugs for the treatment of several
diseases.14 N-Arylhydroxamic acids15 are also known to be
proximate carcinogens16 and demand simple synthetic pro-
tocols. Recently, many synthetic approaches to hydroxamic
entry
catalyst (mol %)
solvent
base
yield (%)a
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
4 (20)
5 (20)
6a (20)
6b (20)
6c (20)
4 (20)
4 (20)
4 (0.5)
4 (5)
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
THF
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
DBUb
KOtBu
KOtBu
KOtBu
KOtBu
KOtBu
KOtBu
DBU
99
50
trace
55
trace
95
85
99
99
0
(10) Chan, A.; Scheidt, K. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 2740–2741.
(11) (a) Yamamoto, H.; Momiyama, N. Chem. Commun. 2005, 3514–
3525. (b) Zuman, P.; Shah, B. Chem. ReV. 1994, 94, 1621–1641.
(12) (a) Boukhris, S.; Souizi, A.; Robert, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996,
37, 179–182. (b) Jung, M. Curr. Med. Chem. 2001, 8, 1505. (c) Armour,
C. A.; Ryan, D. E. Can. J. Chem. 1957, 35, 1454–1460. (d) Chatterjee, B.
Coord. Chem. ReV. 1978, 26, 281–303.
DBU
DBU
10
none
a GC yield. b DBU ) 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene.
(13) Maehr, H. Pure Appl. Chem. 1971, 28, 603–636.
only observable side product was traces of azoxybenzene,
which was minimized by optimizing the reaction parameters.
The scope of the reaction was examined by varying the
aldehydes (1a-1q), as well as the nitroso compounds (2a,
2r-2u). As shown in Table 2, a variety of aryl, alkyl,
alkenyl, and heterocyclic aldehydes gave excellent yields
(55-99%) of the corresponding N-arylhydroxamic acids
(3a-3u).
We have also scaled up the synthesis of N-hydroxy-4-
nitro-N-phenylbenzamide, 3c, to a 5 g scale using 0.125 mol
% of catalyst 4. The reaction was rapidly completed within
2 min, resulting in a turnover frequency (TOF) of 24 000
(14) (a) Fazary, A. E.; Khalil, M. M.; Fahmy, A.; Tantawy, A. T. Med.
J. Islamic Acad. Sci. 2001, 14, 109–116. (b) Miller, M. J. Chem. ReV. 1989,
89, 1563–1579.
(15) (a) Kulys, J.; Deussen, H.-J.; Krikstopaitis, K.; Lolck, R.; Schneider,
P.; Ziemys, A. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 18, 3475–3484. (b) Santos, P. F.;
Lobo, A. M.; Prabhakar, S. Synth. Commun. 1995, 25, 3509–3518. (c)
Priyadarshini, U.; Tandon, S. G. J. Chem. Eng. Data 1967, 12, 143–144.
(d) Kawase, M.; Kitamura, T.; Shimada, M.; Kikugawa, Y. Synth. Commun.
1990, 20, 887–892. (e) Bag, S. P.; Lahiri, S. J. Ind. Chem. Soc. 1975, 52,
30–31. (f) Steinbrunn, G.; Fischer, A. DE 1226364, 1966, 4 pp. (g) Nikishin,
G. I.; Troyansky, E. I.; Svitanko, I. V.; Chizhov, O. S. Tetrahedron Lett.
1984, 25, 97–98. (h) Pokrovskaya, I. E.; Starikova, Z. A.; Eliseeva, L. N.;
Ryabokobylko, Yu. S.; Zhadanov, B. V.; Obodovskaya, A. E.; Olikova,
V. A. Zh. Obsh. Khim. 1990, 60, 2597–2604. (i) Jain, R. K.; Agrawal, Y. K.
J. Chem. Eng. Data 1979, 24, 250–251. (j) Ayyangar, N. R.; Brahme, K. C.;
Kalkote, U. R.; Srinivasan, K. V. Synthesis 1984, 938–941.
2334
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 12, 2008