Vogna et al.
w) were obtained from commercial sources and used as
obtained. 1,2,4,5-Benzenetetraol was prepared by reduction of
2,5-dihydroxy-1,4-benzoquinone with sodium hyposulfite ac-
cording to a reported procedure.25 All other chemicals were of
the highest grade commercially available. Doubly glass-
distilled water was used throughout this study. Horseradish
peroxidase (donor: H2O2 oxidoreductase, EC 1.11.1.7) type II
(167 U/mg, RZ E430/E275 ) 2.0), bovine liver catalase (H2O2
oxidoreductase, EC 1.11.1.6), and [15N]NaNO2 (>99%) were
used.
out at 70 eV. Data were processed with Saturn WS data
analyses software. Temperature program: 80 °C, hold time 1
min; from 80 to 150 °C, rate ) 7 °C/min; 150 °C, hold time 5
min; from 150 to 200 °C, rate ) 7 °C/min; 200 °C, hold time 5
min. The inlet, transfer line, and manifold were taken at 250,
170, and 80 °C in that order. The acquisition started 4 min
after the injection (solvent delay 4 min), and was set in scan
mode in the range 40-650 amu. The threshold was fixed at 1
and sampling was 0.8 scans/s. For sample preparation 5-mL
aliquots were taken at different times from the oxidation
reaction of 1, [15N]1, 1,4-benzoquinone, 1,4-hydroquinone,
4-acetylaminocatechol, 1,2,4-benzenetriol, and 1,4-aminophe-
nol, lyophilized, and treated with HMDS (200 µL), anhydrous
pyridine (200 µL), and TMSCl (50 µL).10 The resulting mixtures
were shaken for 1 min and then centrifuged to separate the
precipitate prior to injection into the chromatograph.
Syn th esis of [15N]1. To solution of phenol (488 mg, 5.3
mmol) and Na15NO2 (731 mg, 10.6 mmol) in water (25 mL)
was added concentrated sulfuric acid (1 mL) under vigorous
stirring in an ice-bath. After 15 min, the yellow precipitate
formed was collected by filtration and dried. The solid thus
obtained (659 mg) was treated with zinc powder (2.0 g) in
glacial acetic acid (25 mL) and the mixture was taken under
reflux for 1 h. After removal of solid materials, the mixture
was taken to dryness under reduced pressure. The residue
dissolved in 0.2 M carbonate buffer at pH 10 (30 mL) was
treated with Na2S2O4 (5 g) and, after 15 min, the mixture was
filtered and added with acetic anhydride (2 mL). After 15 min,
the mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 20 mL) and
the combined organic layers were washed with brine, dried
over sodium sulfate, and taken to dryness. The residue (259
mg) was purified by silica gel column chromatography with
chloroform/methanol 95:5 as the eluant to afford the title
compound (180 mg, 22% yield) homogeneous to TLC (chloroform/
methanol 90:10, Rf 0.72). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6), δ (ppm) 1.96
(s), 6.66 (d, J ) 8.0 Hz), 7.32 (dd, J ) 8.0, 1.6 Hz), 9.15 (s),
9.65 (d, J ) 88 Hz); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm) 23.8 (CH3),
115.0 (CH), 120.0 (CH), 131.6 (C), 153.2 (C), 167.6 (C); 15N
NMR (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm) 133.0. GC-MS analysis (O-TMS
derivative) tR 21.71 m/z 224 (M+, 100). [Found C, 63.09; H,
5.90; N, 9.88; C8H915NO2 requires C, 63.14; H, 5.96; 15N 9.86.]
1
Meth od s. H, 13C, and 15N NMR spectra were recorded at
400.1, 100.6, and 40.5 MHz, in that order. An instrument fitted
with a 5 mm 1H/broadband gradient probe with inverse
geometry was used. For 15N NMR experiments delay values
up to 10 s were used. Experiments used were standard Bruker
implementations of gradient-selected versions of inverse (1H
detected) heteronuclear multiple quantum coherence (HMQC)
and heteronuclear multiple bond correlation (HMBC) experi-
ments. The HMBC experiments used a 100 ms long-range
coupling delay. 15N chemical shifts were referenced to [15N]-
urea in DMSO-d6 at δ 76.97 ppm, relative to NH3 (liquid, 298
K) at 0.0 ppm (15N NMR).26 DMSO-d6 was used as solvent.
TOC determinations were performed with a total organic
carbon analyzer. Irradiation experiments were carried out in
an annular reactor (420 mL) thermostated at 25 °C equipped
with a 17 W low-pressure mercury monochromatic lamp (254
nm).
Calculations of chemical shift values were carried out on
energy-minimized molecular structures with a Gaussian 01
program.27
HP LC An a lyses. Analytical HPLC was carried out with
an instrument equipped with a diode array detector. 0.1 M
formic acid pH 3/CH3CN (95:5 v/v) was used as the eluant for
determination of 1, 1,4-benzoquinone, 1,4-hydroquinone, and
4-acetylaminocatechol with use of an octylsilane coated column
(4.6 × 250 mm, 5 µm particle size) and a flow rate of 0.7 mL/
min. Identification of reaction products was made by compari-
son of the chromatographic behavior (detection wavelength 254
and 280 nm) and UV spectra with those authentic samples.
Quantitation was carried out by comparing integrated peak
areas with external calibration curves.
For determination of formic acid, acetic acid, and oxalic acid,
aliquots of the oxidation mixture of 1 (1 mL) were periodically
withdrawn and added in a screw-capped vial to a solution (2
mL) of 1,2-phenylenediamine (22 mM) in 1% sulfuric acid.
After being heated for 1 h at 100 °C, samples were neutralized
with NaOH and analyzed by HPLC with use of a hexylsilane-
coated column (2.0 × 25 mm, 10 µm particle size), with
detection set at 254 nm. Phosphate buffer (0.1 M)/acetonitrile
(90:10) containing 5% methanol was used as the mobile phase,
at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min.
Syn th esis of 4-Acetyla m in oca tech ol. 4-Nitrocatechol
(500 mg, 3.22 mmol) in 0.2 M carbonate buffer at pH 10 (40
mL) was added to Na2S2O4 (5.6 g) at room temperature under
stirring. After 15 min acetic anhydride (0.72 mL) was added
and, after an additional 15 min, the mixture was extracted
with ethyl acetate (3 × 30 mL). The combined organic layers
were washed with brine, dried over sodium sulfate, and taken
to dryness to afford the title compound as a colorless solid (480
mg, 89% yield) that was stored under vacuum to avoid
darkening in air. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm) 1.95 (s), 6.59
(d, J ) 8.4 Hz), 6.73 (dd, J ) 8.4, 2.0 Hz), 7.11 (d, J ) 2.0 Hz),
8.58 (s), 8.94 (s), 9.56 (s); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm) 23.9
(CH3), 107.9 (CH), 110.4 (CH), 115.3 (CH), 131.6 (C), 141.2
(C), 145.0 (C), 167.7 (C); GC-MS analysis (O-TMS derivative)
tR 26.41 m/z 311 (M+, 100). [Found C, 57.51; H, 5.37; N, 8.42;
C8H9NO3 requires C, 57.48; H, 5.43; N, 8.38.]
GC-MS An a lyses. GC-MS analyses were carried out on a
GC instrument coupled with an ion trap detector using a 30
m cross-bond 5% diphenyl-95% dimethylpolysiloxane column
(0.25 mm i.d., 0.25 µm df). Helium was the carrier gas with a
1 mL/min flow rate. Electron impact ionization was carried
(25) _Anslow, W. K.; Raistrick, H. J . Chem. Soc. 1939, 1446-1454.
(26) Levy, G. C.; Lichter, R. L. Nitrogen-15 Nuclear Magnetic
Resonance Spectroscopy; J ohn Wiley & Sons: New York, 1979.
(27) Frisch, M. J .; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.;
Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J . R.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Montgomery, J . A.;
Stratmann, J r. R.; Burant, E. J . C.; Dapprich, S.; Millam, J . M.;
Daniels, A. D.; Kudin, K. N.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Tomasi, J .;
Barone, V.; Mennucci, B.; Cossi, M.; Adamo, C.; J aramillo, J .; Cammi,
R.; Pomelli, C.; Ochterski, J .; Petersson, G. A.; Ayala, P. Y.; Morokuma,
K.; Salvador, P.; Dannenberg, J . J .; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.;
Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J . B.; Ortiz, J . V.; Cui, Q.; Baboul, A. G.;
Clifford, S.; Cioslowski, J .; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.;
Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Gomperts, R.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J .; Keith,
T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Challacombe, M.;
Gill, P. M. W.; J ohnson, B.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Andres, J . L.;
Gonzalez, C.; Head-Gordon, M.; Replogle, E. S.; Pople, J . A. Gaussian
01, Development Version (Revision A.01); Gaussian, Inc.: Pittsburgh,
PA, 2001.
Oxid a tion Rea ction : Gen er a l P r oced u r e. Solutions of
the appropriate substrate (1.0 mM) and hydrogen peroxide
(100 mM) in water (420 mL) or 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH
5.5, 7.0, or 8.0, were irradiated under stirring. Aliquots of the
mixture were taken periodically and subjected to analysis
(HPLC, GC-MS, and NMR) with or without treatment with
NaBH4 as reported.10 When required, the reaction was carried
out with purging of the solution with argon for at least 30 min
prior to addition of hydrogen peroxide and throughout the
reaction course. Control experiments were carried out for all
substrates under the same reaction conditions but without
irradiation. In some experiments, tert-butyl alcohol at 100 or
200 mM was included in the oxidation mixture of 1. In another
experiment, oxidation of 1 (1 mM) was carried out with
6150 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 67, No. 17, 2002