396
I. Fuks-Janczarek et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A 72 (2009) 394–398
Table 1
molecules 1–4 were accomplished by using a semi-empirical
quantum-chemical method: AM1. The geometry relaxation’s opti-
mization performed by the Steepest Descent algorithm after the
molecular geometry optimization. The values of the total energy
minima were varied at around 4 eV/atom.
Theoretically calculated and experimentally measured principal spectral maxima
positions for the investigated chromophore.
Chromophore
Experimental
peak (nm)
Theoretical
peak (nm) ADF
Experimental spectral peak
positions in nm shifted in
PMMA matrices
Simultaneously we have used the ADF program for molecular
structure optimization. We obtained the optimization geometry
with basis set: DZ (double zeta) because we find the molecular
geometry for molecules with the lowest energy. The basis set cho-
sen will apply to all atoms in our molecules. The ADF program
uses Slater-type orbitals. There are a number of basis sets that can
be freely downloaded. These basis sets are optimized for use in
the zeroth-order regular approximated (ZORA) relativistic equa-
tion, which is an excellent approximation to the fully relativistic
Dirac equation, especially in the valence region, which is impor-
tant in quantum-chemical calculations. ZORA STO basis sets that
can be downloaded freely: DZ fc (double-zeta frozen core), DZ ae
(double-zeta all electron), TZP fc (triple-zeta frozen core 1 polar-
ization function), TZP ae (triple-zeta all electron 1 polarization
function), TZ2P fc (triple-zeta frozen core 2 polarization functions),
TZ2P ae (triple-zeta all electron 2 polarization functions), and QZ4P
ae (quadruple-zeta all electron 4 polarization functions). Seven dif-
ferent types of Slater-type basis sets for the elements H (Z = 1) up
to E118 (Z = 118), ranging from a double-zeta valence quality up to a
quadruple-zeta valence quality, are tested in their performance in
neutral atomic and diatomic oxide calculations. The exponents of
the Slater-type functions are optimized for use in (scalar relativis-
tic) ZORA equations.
A
B
A1 = 400
A2 = 495
Aꢀ1 = 355
Aꢀ2 = 490
B1ꢀ = 235
B2ꢀ = 287
B3ꢀ = 350
B4ꢀ = 440
C1ꢀ = 230
C2ꢀ = 285
C3ꢀ = 355
C4ꢀ = 500
Dꢀ1 = 230
Dꢀ2 = 275
Dꢀ3 = 340
Dꢀ4 = 520
Aꢀ1 = 362
Aꢀ2 = 494
B1 = 225
B2 = 350
B3 = 400
B4 = 445
B1ꢀ = 228
B2ꢀ = 282
B3ꢀ = 353
B4ꢀ = 439
C1ꢀ = 237
C2ꢀ = 278
C3ꢀ = 352
C4ꢀ = 489
Dꢀ1ꢀ = 280
Dꢀ2ꢀ = 390
Dꢀ3ꢀ = 418
Dꢀ4ꢀ = 562
C
C1 = 240
C2 = 270
C3 = 348
C4 = 470
D
D1 = 280
D2 = 370
D3 = 400
Dꢀ4 = 540
solutions) were introduced to the spectrometer using direct inlet.
X-ray diffraction data were collected on KUMA KM4 four-circle
diffractometer at 295 K. Cell parameters, reflection collection and
their reductions were done using KUMA KM4 software [10]. The
refined by the full-matrix least squares technique [11].
The structure of (E,E)-1,4-diisopropoxy-2,5-bis[2-(thien-2-
Table 1 contains more important data concerning crystal,
diffractometer, measurement conditions and refinement. The tio-
phene rings in the crystal are disordered over two orientations like
in other similar compounds [12] (Fig. 2).
The double-zeta basis set is very convenient because it allows us
calculation. These descriptions are meant to give an indication of
the quality. This gives us a more accurate representation of each
orbital. In order to do this, each atomic orbital is expressed as the
sum of two Slater-type orbitals (STOs). The two equations are the
same except for the value of (zeta) [13]. The zeta value accounts
for how diffuse (large) the orbital is. Then the two STOs are added
in some proportion.
3. Results and discussion
All the quantum-chemical computations were done using Ams-
terdam Density Functional package (ADF) and HyperChem package.
The first step we found was the geometry optimization by molec-
ular mechanics force filed (MM+), which is the most general
and frequently used method for molecular mechanics calcula-
tions developed principally for organic molecules. The geometry
optimization and the calculation of optical spectra for separated
In this case, each STO represents a different sized orbital because
the zetas are different. The ‘d’ accounts for the percentage of the sec-
ond STO to add in. The linear combination then gives us the atomic
orbital. Since each of the two equations is the same, the symmetry
remains constant. After we used the Single Point added Excita-
tions (Allowed only), this method determined the SCF solution and
properties running the current geometry.
Fig. 3 presents the principal structures for the four studied
molecules 1–4 with highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO)
and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO). In all the figures
the HOMO orbital is indicated as full areas and the LUMO is marked
as lined areas. The hydrogen atoms was drawn as white spheres and
the carbon atoms as black spheres, each others atoms are noted by
red (oxygen) and yellow (sulfur).
The UV–vis spectra were recorded by Ocean Optics HR4000CG-
UV–NIR spectrometers (wavelength range 200–1100 nm, spectral
resolution 1 nm FWHM (full width at half maximum), 3648-
element linear silicon CCD array) and the Ocean Optics DT-MINI-
2-GS light source. The power output of light source was 3.8 W
for deuterium lamp (200–410 nm) and 1.2 W for tungsten halogen
lamp (360–2000 nm). Absorption was calculated automatically by
the software by the following equation:
ꢀ
ꢁ
Sꢀ − Dꢀ
Rꢀ − Dꢀ
Aꢀ = −log10
Fig. 2. Molecular structure of (E,E)-1,4-diisopropoxy-2,5-bis[2-(thien-2-yl)ethe-
nyl]benzene showing 50% probability displacement ellipsoids obtained by ORTEP 3.
A dominant conformation (82% probability) in the crystal is indicated by numbered
atom symbols without the letter “b”.
The light source, sample chamber and the spectrometer were
connected together by the 400 m diameter fiber optics with col-
limating lenses.